• 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
  • 中文核心期刊中文科技核心期刊
  • Scopus RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
  • 美国EBSCO数据库 俄罗斯《文摘杂志》
  • 《日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(中国)》
二维码

隧道建设(中英文) ›› 2016, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 179-185.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.1672-741X.2016.02.009

• 研究与探索 • 上一篇    下一篇

FLAC3D流固耦合渗流模型探讨

邓思远1, 杨其新1,*, 蒋雅君1, 陈 浩2   

  1. (1. 西南交通大学土木工程学院交通隧道工程教育部重点实验室, 四川 成都 610031;  2. 江苏省交通规划设计院股份有限公司轨道所, 江苏 南京 210014)
  • 收稿日期:2015-11-15 修回日期:2015-11-28 出版日期:2016-02-20 发布日期:2016-03-02
  • 作者简介:邓思远(1990—),男,四川宜宾人,西南交通大学桥梁与隧道专业在读硕士,主要研究方向为隧道及地下工程设计和施工技术。 Email: dengsiyuan_2715@126.com。*通讯作者: 杨其新,Email: yangqixin113@163.com。
  • 基金资助:

    四川省交通科技项目计划任务(2012C14-1); 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(2682014CX065)

Discussion on Seepage Model Based on FLAC3D Solidfluid Coupling

DENG Siyuan1, YANG Qixin1,*, JIANG Yajun1, CHEN Hao2   

  1. (1. Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering of Ministry of Education, School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, China; 2. Trackway Institute, Jiangsu Provincial Communications Planning and Design Institute Co., Ltd., Nanjing 210014, Jiangsu, China)
  • Received:2015-11-15 Revised:2015-11-28 Online:2016-02-20 Published:2016-03-02

摘要:

FLAC3D有限元软件内置4种渗流模型,直接决定计算结果正确与否。渗流场在三维空间中分布复杂,难以根据计算公式定量选用何种模型,不同文献渗流模型选择标准也不相同。为了找到简单、快速、合理的选择方法,有必要对4种渗流模型进行受力分析。以一100 m×100 m×10 m各项同性弹性立方体为例,基于4种渗流模型设计4种工况。通过对比和分析各工况下总应力和孔隙水压分布情况,主要结论如下: 1)模型A、模型C外荷载均由土颗粒骨架承担,其余2种模型流体也参与受力; 2)流体分担外荷载的比例与刚度系数和时间有关; 3)FLAC3D流固耦合过程正是通过调整刚度比、打开和关闭力学-流体进程来实现的。目前我国流固耦合计算基本基于FLAC3D有限元软件,文中结论适用于基础、隧道、基坑等工程,可供相关从业人士借鉴参考。

关键词: 流固耦合, 渗流模式, FLAC3D, 岩土工程

Abstract:

There are 4 seepage models in the FLAC3D finite element software; it is decided by selecting proper seepage models whether the result of numerical calculation is right or not. The seepage field distribution in threedimensional space is complicate; as a result, it is difficult to decide a quantitative yardstick. There are different selection methods in different references. It is necessary to make stress analysis on the 4 seepage models, so as to choose a simple, rapid and rational model selection method. Four construction cases based on the 4 seepage models are designed, with a 100 m×100 m×10 m isotropic elastic cube as an example. The total stresses and seepage field distributions of the 4 construction cases are compared. The conclusions drawn are as follows: 1) For model A and model C, the soil skeleton carries all loads; for other 2 models, the fluid carries partial load too. 2) The load sharing ratio of fluid is based on the stiffness ratio and time. The solidfluid coupling process in FLAC3D is realized by adjusting the stiffness ratio and switching mechanicsfluid process. So far, the calculation of solidfluid coupling is almost based on FLAC3D in China. The conclusions can be applied to foundation engineering and underground engineering, and the paper can provide reference for similar projects.

Key words: solidfluid coupling, seepage model, FLAC3D, geotechnical engineering

中图分类号: