• CSCD核心中文核心科技核心
  • RCCSE(A+)公路运输高质量期刊T1
  • Ei CompendexScopusWJCI
  • EBSCOPж(AJ)JST
二维码

隧道建设(中英文) ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (S1): 406-414.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2026.S1.035

• 规划与设计 • 上一篇    下一篇

内衬岩穴储气库结构内压荷载分担占比特征

郑克勋1, 2, 张云龙1, 2, *, 周婉芬3, 蒋中明3, 邹申威1, 2, 赵代尧1, 2   

  1. (1. 中国电建集团贵阳勘测设计研究院有限公司, 贵州 贵阳 550081; 2. 贵州绿能科技工程建设有限公司, 贵州 贵阳 550081; 3. 长沙理工大学水利与海洋工程学院, 湖南 长沙 410114)
  • 出版日期:2026-06-30 发布日期:2026-06-30
  • 作者简介:郑克勋(1982—),男,四川安岳人,2007年毕业于河海大学,地质工程专业,硕士,正高级工程师,主要从事岩土工程勘察设计、地下空间开发与利用研究工作。E-mail: 848545331@qq.com。*通信作者: 张云龙, E-mail: djgyy_zyl@163.com。

Load Sharing Ratio of Internal Structural Pressure of a Gas Storage Lined Rock Cavern

ZHENG Kexun1, 2, ZHANG Yunlong1, 2, *, ZHOU Wanfen3, JIANG Zhongming3, ZOU Shenwei1, 2, ZHAO Daiyao1, 2#br#   

  1. (1. PowerChina Guiyang Engineering Corporation Limited, Guiyang 550081, Guizhou, China; 2. Guizhou Green Energy Technology Engineering Construction Co., Ltd., Guiyang 550081, Guizhou, China; 3. School of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha 410114, Hunan, China)
  • Online:2026-06-30 Published:2026-06-30

摘要: 内衬岩穴储气库在运行期内压作用下,其混凝土衬砌与围岩普遍进入塑性状态。为精确揭示储气库结构在弹塑性状态下的荷载传递机制,基于弹塑性理论,建立密封层-衬砌-围岩复合结构的数值分析模型,提出相应的内压荷载分担占比计算方法,系统探讨多种关键因素的影响规律。研究结果表明: 1)弹塑性解与弹性解之间存在根本性差异,考虑材料塑性后,密封层的荷载分担特性发生显著变化,其中钢衬密封层的分担比明显提高,而衬砌的分担比则大幅下降,围岩始终是承担内压的主体结构。2)敏感性分析进一步揭示,密封层材料刚度、围岩级别及衬砌配筋率是主导荷载分配的关键因素。柔性密封层更有利于实现围岩承载的设计理念; 围岩级别的降低会显著影响荷载分担占比,导致衬砌承担更大比例的荷载; 提高衬砌配筋率可有效增强其环向约束与承载能力,引起衬砌的内压荷载分担比例显著增加。3)相较之下,衬砌的结构分缝型式、厚度变化及运行压力在一定范围内的波动,对整体荷载分配的影响相对有限。

关键词: 压缩空气储能, 内衬岩穴储气库, 塑性变形理论, 密封结构, 荷载分担

Abstract: Under the internal pressure during operation, the concrete lining and surrounding rock of a lined rock cavern are generally in a plastic state. To accurately reveal the load transfer mechanism of the cavern structure under elastoplastic conditions, a numerical model of the composite structure comprising the sealing layer, lining, and surrounding rock is established based on elastoplastic theory. A corresponding method for calculating the internal pressure load-sharing ratio is proposed, and the influence patterns of multiple key factors are systematically investigated. The results indicate fundamental differences between the elastoplastic and elastic solutions. When material plasticity is considered, the load-sharing characteristics of the sealing layer change significantly: the load-sharing ratio of the steel-lined sealing layer increases notably, while that of the concrete lining decreases substantially. The surrounding rock remains the primary structure bearing the internal pressure. Sensitivity analysis further reveals that the stiffness of the sealing layer material, the grade of the surrounding rock, and the reinforcement ratio of the lining are key factors dominating the load distribution. Specifically, a flexible sealing layer is more conducive to realizing the design philosophy of load-bearing by the surrounding rock. A reduction in the grade of the surrounding rock significantly affects the load-sharing ratio, leading to a larger proportion of the load being carried by the lining. Increasing the reinforcement ratio of the lining effectively enhances its hoop restraint and load-bearing capacity, resulting in a notable increase in its share of the internal pressure load. In contrast, factors such as the structural joint type of the lining, variations in lining thickness, and fluctuations in operating pressure within a certain range have relatively limited impact on the overall load distribution.

Key words: compressed air energy storage, gas storage lined rock cavern, plastic deformation theory, sealing structure, load sharing