隧道高压钠灯与LED灯照明节能分析、比选

张理智

doi:10.3973/j.issn.1672-741X.2012.z2.004

隧道建设 >

2012 , Vol. 32 >Issue 增刊2: 18 - 23

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3973/j.issn.1672-741X.2012.z2.004

研究与探索

隧道高压钠灯与LED灯照明节能分析、比选

张理智

展开

（中铁隧道集团四处有限公司，南宁 530003）

张理智（1981—）,男，广东乐昌人，2005年毕业于西安建筑科技大学房屋建筑工程专业，大专，工程师，现从事公路工程施工技术管理工作。

收稿日期: 2012-08-16

修回日期: 2012-09-10

网络出版日期: 2013-02-19

收起

Analysis on and Comparison and Contrast between Highpressure Sodium Lamps and LED Lights

ZHANG Lizhi

Expand

(The 4th Engineering Co.，Ltd. of China Railway Tunnel Group, Nanning 530003, China)

Received date: 2012-08-16

Revised date: 2012-09-10

Online published: 2013-02-19

Fold

摘要

为证实LED灯比高压钠灯在隧道照明应用中更节能高效，通过对公路隧道照明灯具的研究，分析高压钠灯与LED灯的光效、能耗、寿命、成本等几项因素，对2种方案进行对比。得出以下结论： LED灯光效高，能耗低，寿命长，虽然高压钠灯的购置成本要比LED灯低，但LED灯在运营成本方面具有明显的优势，长期运营总成本要比高压钠灯低，使用LED灯具切实能达到节能减排、低碳环保的效果。

关键词： 隧道照明; 高压钠灯; LED灯; 节能分析; 比选

本文引用格式

张理智 . 隧道高压钠灯与LED灯照明节能分析、比选[J]. 隧道建设, 2012 , 32(增刊2) : 18 -23 . DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.1672-741X.2012.z2.004

Abstract

The lights used in tunnel are studied. Comparison and contrast is made on lighting efficiency, energy cost, using life and cost of highpressure sodium lamps and LED lights. Conclusions drawn are as follows: 1) LED light has advantages such as high lighting efficiency, low energy cost and long using life. 2) LED light is superior than highpressure sodium lamp in term of running cost, though the cost of LED light is higher than that of highpressure sodium lamp. 3) Energysaving, lowcarbon and environmentfriendly effect can be reached by using LED lights.

Key words： tunnel lighting; highpressure sodium lamp; LED light; energysaving; analysis; comparison

Options

文章导航

〈

〉

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract