• CSCD核心中文核心科技核心
  • RCCSE(A+)公路运输高质量期刊T1
  • Ei CompendexScopusWJCI
  • EBSCOPж(AJ)JST
二维码
研究与探索

非等大断面小净距地铁隧道施工方案分析及优化

  • 丁改改 ,
  • 姜海 ,
  • 孔祥兴
展开
  • (中交第一公路勘察设计研究院有限公司, 陕西 西安 710075)
丁改改(1962—),女,内蒙古临河人,2004年毕业于长沙理工大学,土木工程专业,本科,高级工程师,主要从事公路和地下工程方面的试验检测和管理工作。

收稿日期: 2014-05-14

  修回日期: 2014-07-08

  网络出版日期: 2014-08-21

Analysis on and Optimization of Construction Scheme of Closelyspaced Metro Tunnels with Different Crosssection Dimensions

  • DING Gaigai ,
  • JIANG Hai ,
  • KONG Xiangxing
Expand
  • (CCCC First Highway Consultant Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710075, Shaanxi, China)

Received date: 2014-05-14

  Revised date: 2014-07-08

  Online published: 2014-08-21

摘要

为同时满足双线行车和右线停车线扩大断面的功能需要,西安地铁一号线枣园北路站—汉城路站区间采用非等大断面小净距黄土地铁隧道。针对断面不等大、盾构法与新奥法组合施工方案、小净距黄土地铁隧道的特点,进行了左线小断面盾构法、右线大断面双侧壁导坑法或CRD法双线依次先后贯通3种施工方案的数值模拟与比选分析。计算结果表明,与先贯通小洞、后开挖大洞的方案相比较,采用先新奥法贯通大断面隧道、后盾构法掘进小断面隧道的施工方案对围岩扰动较小,能更有利于控制地表变形;双侧壁导坑法较CRD法虽更能充分体现围岩的自承能力,有效发挥初期支护的承载能力,提高二次衬砌的安全储备,但若将先贯通的大断面隧道施工方案由双侧壁导坑法改为CRD法,可在确保工程安全的前提下降低施工成本,并加快施工进度,顺利地完成隧道建设。

本文引用格式

丁改改 , 姜海 , 孔祥兴 . 非等大断面小净距地铁隧道施工方案分析及优化[J]. 隧道建设, 2014 , 34(8) : 715 -720 . DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.1672-741X.2014.08.002

Abstract

A portion of the running tunnel from Zaoyuan North Road Station to Hancheng Road Station on No. 1 line of Xi’an Metro is designed as a closelyspaced Metro tunnel with different crosssection dimensions. The parallel tunnel tubes have such features as different crosssection dimensions, dual construction methods (shield tunneling method and NATM) and small spacing. Numerical simulation is made on the construction of the left small crosssection tunnel tube by shield tunneling method and the right large crosssection tunnel tube by double side drift method and CRD method. The calculation results show that: 1) Compared to the scheme that the left small crosssection tunnel tube is broken through before the right large crosssection tunnel tube is excavated, the scheme that the right large crosssection tunnel tube is broken through by NATM before the left small crosssection tunnel tube is bored by shield has smaller disturbance on the surrounding rock mass and is more helpful for ground deformation control; 2) Compared to CRD method, double side drift method is more helpful to making full use of the selfsupport capacity of the surrounding rock mass, is more helpful to making full use of the loadbearing capacity of the primary support, and is more helpful to improving the safety reserve of the secondary lining; however, if CRD method is adopted for the right large crosssection tunnel tube, which is broken through before the left small crosssection tunnel tube, the construction cost can be reduced, the construction progress can be improved and the tunnel can be constructed successfully under safe conditions.

文章导航

/

〈 〉