以莞惠城际铁路松山湖地下隧道（矿山法）施工为例，通过各综合围岩等级的工序分析、工法类比、稳定性与优势比较等，认为该隧道矿山法施工实际揭示围岩与设计工法存在一定的适应性问题，并提出以下建议： 1）Ⅵ级围岩隧道（第四、五、六类围岩）建议调整为三台阶七步法+拱部临时立柱法、Ⅵ级围岩隧道（第七、八类围岩）建议调整为三台阶七步法； 2)Ⅴ级围岩隧道（第二类围岩）建议调整为带临时仰拱台阶法或上下台阶法、Ⅴ级围岩隧道（第三、四、五类围岩）建议调整为上下台阶法； 3)Ⅳ级围岩隧道建议调整为上下台阶法； 4)其他未涉及的围岩情况，工法均不做调整。

The construction procedure, construction method, stability and advantages and disadvantages of different grades of surrounding rocks are analyzed. The analytical results show that the design construction methods of Songshanhu underground tunnel on DongguanHuizhou intercity railway are not so feasible. So some suggestions are proposed as follows: 1) For Grade Ⅵ surrounding rocks, threebench sevenstep method + arch temporary column support method is feasible for No. 4, No. 5 and No. 6 surrounding rocks; and threebench sevenstep method is feasible for No. 7 and No. 8 surrounding rocks. 2) For Grade Ⅴ surrounding rocks, temporary invert bench method or top heading and benching method is feasible for No. 2 surrounding rock; and top heading and bench method is feasible for No. 3, No. 4 and No. 5 surrounding rocks. 3) For Grade Ⅳ surrounding rocks, top heading and bench method is feasible.