- CSCD核心中文核心科技核心
- RCCSE(A+)公路运输高质量期刊T1
- Ei CompendexScopusWJCI
- EBSCOPж(AJ)JST
地下2层双线同站台换乘方案研究
收稿日期: 2018-09-26
修回日期: 2018-11-19
网络出版日期: 2020-03-11
Transfer Scheme of Underground Twofloor Doubleline Metro Tunnel with Same Platform
Received date: 2018-09-26
Revised date: 2018-11-19
Online published: 2020-03-11
为解决目前地下2层双线同站台换乘设计方案普遍存在的土建造价高、空间浪费大、换乘比例受到一定限制、车站前后区间交叉多、联络通道设置不方便、施工风险大等问题,通过对5、9、12 m 3种地铁车站站台层中间线路的左右中心线间距方案进行比选,选取12 m线间距方案为综合最优方案,扩大后的空间可设置设备用房或换乘站台;同时,根据实际换乘客流情况,选择合理的地铁线路左右线布置方案。通过实例分析可知: 通过采用新的布置方案,此类同站台换乘车站前后区间均可采用盾构法施工,不需要在区间设置竖向联络通道,从而可以减少明挖车站长度,降低车站和区间的综合造价,同时减少区间的平面交叉,降低施工风险;增设换乘站台的方案还可以增加车站同站台的换乘比例。
关键词: 地铁车站; 2层双线同站台换乘方案; 方案比选; 综合造价; 换乘比例
刘淑燕 . 地下2层双线同站台换乘方案研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2019 , 39(5) : 795 -801 . DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2019.05.011
The transfer design of underground twofloor doubleline metro tunnel with same platform is characterized by high cost, large space waste, limited transfer proportion, multiple intersections in front and back of the station section, inconvenient crosspassage setting and high construction risk. Hence, 3 schemes of different spacings between right central line and left central line, 5 m, 9 m and 12 m, are put forward and compared, in which the spacing of 12 m is the optimum and can be used as equipment room or transfer platform; meanwhile, rational layout scheme of right line and left line should be determined according to the actual transfer passenger flow. The case study results show that by adopting the abovementioned scheme, the sections ahead of and behind the station can be bored by shield, no vertical connection gallery should be constructed, the length of opencut station can be shortened, and the cost, atgrade intersection of section and construction risk can be reduced; the transfer proportion can be increased by adding transfer platforms.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |