- CSCD核心中文核心科技核心
- RCCSE(A+)公路运输高质量期刊T1
- Ei CompendexScopusWJCI
- EBSCOPж(AJ)JST
复杂地层妈湾海底大直径泥水盾构隧道掌子面稳定性数值分析研究
(1. 中铁南方投资集团有限公司, 广东 深圳 518000; 2. 同济大学土木工程学院地下建筑与工程系, 上海 200092)
网络出版日期: 2021-08-27
基金资助
中铁南方2020年度科技创新计划立项课题“复杂地层海底大直径泥水盾构隧道施工控制关键技术研究”; 国家自然科学基金重大项目(52090083)
Numerical Analysis of Face Stability of LargeDiameter Slurry Shield Used in Mawan Subsea Tunnel in Complex Strata
(1.China Railway Southern Investment Group Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518000, Guangdong, China; 2. Department of Geotechnical Engineering College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)
Online published: 2021-08-27
刘继强, 陈晓庆, 张晓东, 乔亚飞
.
复杂地层妈湾海底大直径泥水盾构隧道掌子面稳定性数值分析研究
A largediameter slurry shield used in Mawan subsea tunnel continuously crosses through fullface soft stratum, uppersoft and lowerhard strata, and fullface slightlyweathered rock stratum. To investigate the influence of slurry pressure of slurry shield on face stability under complex strata conditions, 3D numerical simulation models under different strata are established to obtain corresponding displacement distribution laws and ultimate minimum supportstress ratio of tunnel face. In addition, the rectangular load mode is often used to simplify the slurry pressure in previous researches, the differences between the actual trapezoidal load mode and the simplified rectangular load mode in the stability analysis of tunnel face are compared and analyzed. The results show the following. (1) In the case of fullface soft stratum, the displacement of the tunnel face is relatively uniform in the middle of tunnel face, while it is quite different at both ends, whereas in the uppersoft and lowerhard strata, the displacement decreases linearly from the arch crown to the bottom. (2) The maximum supportstress ratio of the tunnel face obtained by tangent intersection method is the largest in the fullface soft stratum, followed by that in uppersoft and lowerhard strata, and that in the fullface slightlyweathered rock stratum is the smallest. (3) In the case of trapezoidal load distribution, both the upper soil displacement and the obtained ultimate minimum support stress ratio are far larger than that of rectangular load distribution, indicating that it is unreasonable to ignore the influence of unit weight of slurry in calculation.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |