• CSCD核心中文核心科技核心
  • RCCSE(A+)公路运输高质量期刊T1
  • Ei CompendexScopusWJCI
  • EBSCOPж(AJ)JST
二维码
研究与探索

基于深度学习的隧道混凝土温度滚动预测方法研究

  • 范中晶 ,
  • 郑晨路
展开
  • (1. 中铁隧道局集团有限公司, 广东 广州 511458; 2. 上海大学土木工程系, 上海 200444)
范中晶(1988—),男,河南封丘人,2018年毕业于长沙理工大学,土木工程专业,本科,工程师,现从事隧道工程科研与施工管理工作。Email: 389173477@qq.com。

网络出版日期: 2023-05-23

Rolling Prediction Method of Tunnel Concrete Temperature Based on Deep Learning

  • FAN Zhongjing ,
  • ZHENG Chenlu
Expand
  • (1. China Railway Tunnel Group Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 511458, Guangdong, China; 2. Department of Civil Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

Online published: 2023-05-23

摘要

为实时掌握隧道大体积混凝土内部温度变化,及时制定合理的控温措施,防止隧道大体积混凝土在浇筑过程中由于大范围的水化热反应而产生温度裂缝,基于长短期记忆神经网络LSTM(long short-term memory)和门控循环单元神经网络GRU(gate recurrent unit)2种深度学习算法的多参数、非线性拟合能力,提出隧道大体积混凝土内部温度变化的滚动预测方法,并依托衢州市智慧新城三江中路连通隧道工程建设中采用的双光栅传感器现场混凝土温度实测数据,采用平均绝对误差MAE(mean absolute error)和决定系数(R2)对2类模型的预测结果精度进行检验评价。结果表明: 2种网络模型均能捕捉隧道大体积混凝土内部温度发展规律,准确预测隧道大体积混凝土内部温度变化曲线,且GRU的精度优于LSTM。其中,GRU的MAE为1.34 ℃,比LSTM减小1.07 ℃,同时GRU的R2为0.98,也优于LSTM的R2(0.9)。

本文引用格式

范中晶 , 郑晨路 . 基于深度学习的隧道混凝土温度滚动预测方法研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2023 , 43(4) : 611 -617 . DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2023.04.007

Abstract

The internal temperature change in mass tunnel concrete can be investigated in real time by formulating timely and reasonable temperature control measures that can prevent the temperature cracks caused by the largescale hydration heat reaction during the pouring process of mass tunnel concrete. A rolling prediction method is proposed for the internal temperature change of mass tunnel concrete based on the multiparameter and nonlinear fitting ability of two deep learning algorithms, namely, the long shortterm memory (LSTM) and the gate recurrent unit (GRU). Relying on the onsite concrete temperature measurement data of the doublegrating sensor used to construct the Sanjiang Middle road connecting tunnel project in Quzhou Smart New City, the mean absolute error (MAE) and the 〖WT5《TNR#I》〗R〖WT5《TNR》〗squared (〖WT5《TNR#I》〗R〖WT5《TNR》〗2) values are used herein to test and evaluate the prediction result accuracies of the two models. The results show that the two network models can capture the internal temperature development law of mass tunnel concrete and accurately predict its internal temperature change curve. Furthermore, the GRU accuracy is better than that of LSTM. The MAE of GRU is 1.34 ℃, which is 1.07 ℃ lower than that of LSTM, and the 〖WT5《TNR#I》〗R〖WT5《TNR》〗2 of GRU is 0.98, which is better than that of LSTM (i.e., 0.9).
文章导航

/

〈 〉