为厘清盾构切桩的发展脉络，全面掌握其应用及发展情况，综述了国内外盾构切削桩基技术的研究现状。首先，基于文献计量分析对盾构切桩相关文献的热点关键词和发展趋势进行分析，归纳总结盾构切桩领域的研究热点及研究进展。其次，在此基础上分别从盾构改造、掘削参数优化、盾构切桩引起的地层响应和桩基承载力研究3个方面综述当前最新研究成果。最后，对盾构切削桩基的主要研究方法、研究机制、适用范围及优缺点进行归纳总结，探讨有待解决的主要问题以及未来重点研究方向。结果表明： 1）10余年来盾构切桩技术发展迅速且取得了良好的切桩效果及经济效益反馈，切桩技术已相对成熟； 2）刀具参数及布置方式尚没有明确的确定方法，在复杂地质条件下，仍存在刀具磨损和钢筋缠绕刀盘的现象； 3）由于混凝土脊破裂面产生的机制尚不明确，且已有的计算方法未考虑混凝土强度的影响，刀间距设计多依赖已有的工程经验； 4）盾构切桩掘削参数的选取多是基于数值模拟和室内试验，对实际工况都进行一定程度的简化，难以反映切桩过程中盾构与桩基相互作用的复杂效应； 5）推力和转矩计算模型的公式简化条件不尽相同、侧重点各不相同，公式的推广性和适用性还需进一步提高； 6）目前对切桩引起的地表沉降以及控制措施研究较多，影响机制方面的研究还较少。

A comprehensive overview of global research on shield cutting pile foundations is offered to shed light on their development, applications, and progress. A literature review encompassing key terms and emerging trends in shield cutting pile technology is conducted. This initial step allows us to understand the current state of research and highlight areas of active investigation. Subsequently, recent research achievements are consolidated into three focal points: the transformation of shield machines, the optimization of cutting parameters, and the study of stratum response and pile bearing capacity concerning shield cutting piles. Finally, the primary research methods, mechanisms, applicability, strengths, weaknesses, and outstanding challenges of shield cutting pile foundations are summarized and discussed. Furthermore, future research directions are identified. Key findings are as follows: (1) Rapid development in shield cutting pile technology has yielded promising pilecutting results and economic benefits over the past decade, reaching a relatively mature stage. (2) Challenges persist in determining the parameters and arrangements of shield pilecutting tools, specifically in complex geological conditions where tool wear and rebar entanglement at the cutterhead are common issues. (3) The mechanism of the concrete ridge rupture surface remains incompletely understood, and existing calculation methods lack considerations for concrete strength, relying heavily on engineering expertise to design cutter spacing. (4) Selection of shield pilecutting parameters primarily relies on numerical simulations and indoor experiments, which may oversimplify real working conditions and fail to capture the complex interactions between the shield and the pile foundation during cutting. (5) Existing formulas for thrust and torque calculations vary in their simplifications and emphases, warranting improvements in generalizability and applicability. (6) Thus, the current literature predominantly focuses on surface settlement caused by cut piles and corresponding mitigation measures, rather than exploring the impact mechanisms of shield cutting pile technology.