水下超大直径盾构联络通道建设方案对比研究——以广州海珠湾隧道工程为例

黄书华, 郑镇跡, 盛健, 谢典延, 张良, 陈湘生, 苏栋

doi:10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2024.S1.044

隧道建设 >

2024 , Vol. 44 >Issue S1: 408 - 417

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2024.S1.044

施工技术

水下超大直径盾构联络通道建设方案对比研究——以广州海珠湾隧道工程为例

展开

（1. 中铁十四局集团大盾构工程有限公司，江苏南京 210000； 2. 深圳大学土木与交通工程学院，广东深圳 518060； 3. 极端环境岩土和隧道工程智能建养全国重点实验室（深圳大学），广东深圳 518060）

黄书华（1988—），男，河南商丘人，2013年毕业于中国矿业大学，土木工程专业，本科，高级工程师，现从事地下隧道工程技术研究与管理工作。 E-mail： 916630286@qq.com。*通信作者：苏栋， E-mail： sudong@szu.edu.cn。

网络出版日期: 2024-09-02

收起

Comparative Study on Construction Schemes for Connecting Channel of Underwater Super-Large Diameter Shield Tunnel: A Case Study on Haizhuwan Tunnel in Guangzhou, China

Expand

(1. China Railway 14th Bureau Group Large Shield Engineering Co., Ltd., Nanjing 210000, Jiangsu, China; 2. College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, Guangdong, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Geotechnics and Tunnelling (Shenzhen University), Shenzhen 518060, Guangdong, China)

Online published: 2024-09-02

Fold

摘要

针对在越江海高水压水下超大直径盾构隧道联络通道施工过程中缺乏足够的工程技术标准和案例经验、设计与施工面临众多挑战问题，以广州海珠湾超大直径盾构隧道区间的6条联络通道工程为例，对工程地质补勘资料及现场施工情况进行分析，揭示原矿山法设计施工方案存在的不足，并基于此提出“矿山法结合地层冻结加固方案”和“机械顶管法施工方案”2种优化方案；随后在安全性、经济性、施工工期等方面对不同工法进行综合优选分析，同时引入碳排放指标进行绿色低碳评估。研究结果表明： 1）机械顶管法在安全性和施工效率上优于其他方案，能够显著缩短施工周期； 2）相比矿山法结合地层冻结加固方案，机械顶管法方案碳排放量减少了2 747.51 tCO_2e。

关键词： 超大直径盾构; 水下联络通道; 地层冻结法; 矿山法; 机械顶管法; 碳排放量计算; 方案比选

本文引用格式

黄书华, 郑镇跡, 盛健, 谢典延, 张良, 陈湘生, 苏栋 . 水下超大直径盾构联络通道建设方案对比研究——以广州海珠湾隧道工程为例[J]. 隧道建设, 2024 , 44(S1) : 408 -417 . DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2024.S1.044

Abstract

In the construction process of underwater and high water pressure large-diameter shield tunnel connecting channels, the design and construction face numerous challenges due to the lack of sufficient engineering technical standards and case experience. To address these issues, case study is conducted on six connecting channels of Haizhuwan large-diameter shield tunnel in Guangzhou, China, to explore a more applicable construction scheme. First, an in-depth analysis of the engineering geological supplementary investigation data and on-site construction conditions is conducted to reveal the deficiencies in the original mining method design and construction scheme. Then, two optimized schemes, mining method combined with ground freezing reinforcement scheme and mechanical pipe jacking construction scheme, are proposed. Thereafter, a comprehensive optimal selection analysis of different construction methods is performed in terms of safety, cost-effectiveness, and construction period, and carbon emission indicators are introduced for green and low-carbon assessment. The results show that the mechanical pipe jacking method is superior in safety and construction efficiency to other schemes, significantly shortening the construction period; and the carbon emissions are reduced by 2 747.51 tCO_2e compared to the mining method combined with ground freezing reinforcement scheme.

Key words： large-diameter shield; underwater connecting channel; ground freezing method; mining method; mechanical pipe jacking method; carbon emission calculation; scheme comparison

Options

文章导航

〈

〉

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract