• 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
  • 中文核心期刊中文科技核心期刊
  • Scopus RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
  • 美国EBSCO数据库 俄罗斯《文摘杂志》
  • 《日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(中国)》
二维码

隧道建设(中英文) ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (S1): 222-232.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2023.S1.026

• 研究与探索 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于GA-BP神经网络的富水砂层渣土改良效果预测

刘汭琳1, 满轲1 *, 刘晓丽2, 宋志飞1, 周然3   

  1. 1. 北方工业大学土木工程学院, 北京 100043 2. 清华大学 水沙科学与水利水电工程国家重点试验室, 北京 100084; 3. 粤水电轨道交通建设有限公司, 广东 广州 510610)

  • 出版日期:2023-07-31 发布日期:2023-08-28
  • 作者简介:刘汭琳(1998—),女,河南安阳人,北方工业大学土木水利专业在读硕士,研究方向为基于深度学习的隧道病害检测及地下隧道智能技术。Email: liuruilin_ncut@163.com。 *通信作者: 满轲, Email: man_ke@sina.cn。

Prediction of Ground Conditioning Effect of WaterRich Sandy Stratum Based on Genetic AlgorithmBack Propagation Neural Network

LIU Ruilin1, MAN Ke1, *, LIU Xiaoli2, SONG Zhifei1, ZHOU Ran3   

  1. (1. College of Engineering, North China University of Technology, Beijing 100043, China;2. State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Hydraulic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;3. YSD Rail Transit Construction Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510610, Guangdong, China)

  • Online:2023-07-31 Published:2023-08-28

摘要: 为了解决通过室内试验评价渣土改良效果存在耗时长、成本高,无法满足目前隧道掘进中的预测需求等问题,基于深度学习,引入遗传算法GAgenetic algorithm)对传统BPback propagation)神经网络重新设计和优化,创建GA-BP模型;选择均方根误差GMSE、平均绝对误差MAE和决定系数R2作为评价模型预测效果的研究指标; 利用机器学习中支持向量机算法与随机森林算法的预测结果与GA-BP模型的预测结果进行对比。试验结果表明: 1)基于深度学习的传统BP模型和本文创建的GA-BP模型的各项评价指标皆高于机器学习算法; 2)相较于传统BP网络的预测结果,GA-BP模型对内摩擦角、渗透系数和坍落度预测的最高相对误差分别降低了7.18%5.02%1.17%,且GA-BP模型的RMSEMAE和R2值都优于传统BP模型和机器学习算法的预测结果。由此可得,基于深度学习的神经网络比机器学习算法更能提取到数据之间的关联性,且经过遗传算法优化后得到的GA-BP模型提高了传统BP模型的预测准确度。

关键词: 富水砂层, 渣土改良, 遗传算法, BP神经网络, 效果预测

Abstract: The existing indoor tests on soil conditioning effect have many disadvantages such as long time and high cost, as well as cannot meet prediction needs in tunnel excavation. In this paper, based on deep learning, genetic algorithm (GA) is introduced to redesign and optimize the traditional back propagation(BP) neural network to create a GABP model. The root mean square error(RMSE), the mean absolute error(MAE), and the determinable coefficients WT〗R2 WT5《TNR》〗are selected as the research indicators to evaluate the prediction effect of the model. Finally, the prediction results of the support vector machine algorithm and the random forest algorithm in machine learning are compared with those of the GABP model. The experimental results show the following: (1) Both the traditional BP model based on deep learning and the GABP model created have higher evaluation indexes than the machine learning algorithm. (2) Compared with the prediction results of the traditional BP network, the highest relative errors of the GABP model for the prediction of internal friction angle, permeability coefficient, and slump are reduced by 7.18%, 5.02%, and 1.17% respectively. (3) The RMSE, MAE, and values of the GABP model are better than the prediction results of the traditional BP model and the machine learning algorithm. It can be concluded that deep learningbased neural networks are better at extracting correlations between data than machine learning algorithms, and the GABP model obtained after optimization by genetic algorithms improves the prediction accuracy of traditional BP models.

Key words: waterrich sandy stratum, soil conditioning, genetic algorithm, back propagation neural network, effect prediction