天津地铁6号线双线平行盾构隧道施工间隔对地表土体变形影响研究

doi:10.3973/j.issn.1672-741X.2015.10.003

中国科学引文数据库（CSCD）来源期刊
中文核心期刊中文科技核心期刊
Scopus RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
美国EBSCO数据库俄罗斯《文摘杂志》
《日本科学技术振兴机构数据库（中国）》

隧道建设（中英文） ›› 2015, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10): 989-996.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.1672-741X.2015.10.003

天津地铁6号线双线平行盾构隧道施工间隔对地表土体变形影响研究

张社荣^1,2，于茂^1,2，杜晓喻^1,2，娄雨³

（1. 天津大学水利工程仿真与安全国家重点实验室，天津 300072; 2. 天津大学建筑工程学院，天津 300072； 3. 中国铁建十六局集团，天津 300162）

收稿日期:2015-05-11 修回日期:2015-08-19 出版日期:2015-10-20 发布日期:2015-11-09
作者简介:张社荣（1960—），男，山东日照人， 1982年毕业于天津大学，水利系，博士，教授，现从事水电及岩土工程安全技术研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金创新研究群体科学基金（51321065）

Effect on Construction Intervals on Deformation Characteristics of Surface Soil during Construction of Twintube Shieldbored Tunnels: Case Study on a Running Tunnel of Line 6 of Tianjin Metro

ZHANG Sherong^1,2, YU Mao^1,2, DU Xiaoyu^1,2, LOU Yu³

(1. State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; 3. China Railway 16th Bureau Group Co., Ltd, Tianjin 300162, China)

Received:2015-05-11 Revised:2015-08-19 Online:2015-10-20 Published:2015-11-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

研究双线盾构隧道在不同施工间隔下施工时地表的变形规律，对控制地表整体变形及不均匀变形十分重要。依托天津地铁6号线双线盾构隧道下穿天津西站站场实际工程实例，以铁路线设施的关键变形控制指标为评判依据，研究盾构左右线不同施工间隔下的地表变形分布特性，对比分析间隔距离与地表沉降和不均匀沉降的关系，为双线盾构隧道工程选择合适的施工间隔提供依据，以保证工程安全及地表铁路设施的正常运行。结果表明，不同施工间隔的影响主要表现为掘进过程对地表土体变形的扰动程度及扰动范围的明显差异：对于地表沉降变形而言，施工间隔越小，掌子面处地表土体沉降越快，且左线完全先行时，地表土体的纵向变形范围约为20 m，相较两洞同时施工时变形范围减小约25 m；对于地表不均匀变形而言，左线完全先行施工条件下，地表轨向变形、水平变形、轨距变形最大分别约为1、0.6、0.2 mm，相较两洞同时施工时分别减小0.8、0.2、0.15 mm。因此，对于双线盾构隧道而言，两洞同时施工时最不利于地表变形的控制，而一条隧道完全先行掘进的方案最有利于地表变形的控制。

关键词: 天津地铁, 盾构隧道, 双线隧道, 施工间隔, 地表变形规律, 数值仿真

Abstract:

Studying the mechanism of the ground surface deformation under different construction intervals of twintube tunnels has great importance for the control of the overall deformation and the differential deformation of the ground surface. In the paper, the distribution characteristics of the surface soil deformation under different construction intervals are studied, with a twintube running tunnel on Line 6 of Tianjin Metro crossing underneath Tianjin West Railway Station as an example. In the study, the key deformation control indices of the railway facilities are adopted as the evaluation standard. The relationship between the ground surface settlement/differential settlement and the construction intervals are analyzed, providing reliable basis for choosing suitable construction intervals so as to ensure the engineering safety and the smooth operation of the railway facilities. The results reveal that the construction intervals have obvious impact on the disturbance degrees and disturbance ranges of the ground surface deformation during the tunnel construction. As for the ground surface settlement, the smaller the construction intervals are, the faster the surface settlement at the tunnel face is. The range of the longitudinal deformation of the surface soil is about 20m when the left tube is completely in advance, about 25 m smaller than that in simultaneous construction. As for the differential settlement of the surface soil, when the left tube is completely in advance, the maximum values of the surface deformations in the track direction, horizontal direction and track spacing are 1mm, 0.6mm and 0.2mm respectively, about 0.8mm, 0.2mm and 0.15mm smaller than those in simultaneous construction respectively. Thus, the simultaneous construction of the twin tunnel tubes is the most adverse condition in terms of controlling the surface soil deformation, while accomplishing the excavation of one tube before the construction of the other is the best way to control the surface soil deformation.

Key words: Tianjin Metro, shieldbored tunnel, twintube tunnel, construction interval, ground surface deformation characteristics, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

U 459.3

张社荣，于茂，杜晓喻，娄雨. 天津地铁6号线双线平行盾构隧道施工间隔对地表土体变形影响研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2015, 35(10): 989-996.

ZHANG Sherong, YU Mao, DU Xiaoyu, LOU Yu. Effect on Construction Intervals on Deformation Characteristics of Surface Soil during Construction of Twintube Shieldbored Tunnels: Case Study on a Running Tunnel of Line 6 of Tianjin Metro[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2015, 35(10): 989-996.

[1]	张力, 苏芮, 何川, 封坤, 方若全, 徐培凯. 纯压弯受力下大断面盾构隧道管片接头抗弯足尺试验研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(7): 997-1003.
[2]	韩贇. 水下盾构隧道管片钻穿引起的涌水突泥治理技术研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(7): 1049-1056.
[3]	张亚洲. 考虑密封垫表面工作状态的盾构隧道接缝防水能力数值模拟研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(6): 813-820.
[4]	金跃郎, 丁文其, 肖明清, 孙文昊, 吴炜枫, 叶美锡, 涂新斌. 苏通GIL 综合管廊超高水压盾构隧道接缝防水性能试验研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(4): 538-544.
[5]	杜闯东, 张　杰, 吴乐斌. 以色列特拉维夫地铁红线先隧后站施工技术应用[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(4): 562-568.
[6]	张稳军, 丁超, 张成平, 姜坤. 不同错台量对复合型密封垫影响及长期防水预测[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(3): 337-345.
[7]	WANG Baiquan, PENG Tao, SHANG Wei, XIE Tao. Design and Application of Automatic Forming Module of Shield Tunneling Steel Cage′s Plane Mesh（盾构管片钢筋笼平面网片自动成型模块设计与应用）[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(3): 444-451.
[8]	张稳军, 丁超, 张高乐, 王祎, 上官丹丹, 姜坤. 盾构隧道管片接缝复合型密封垫选型设计研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(2): 246-255.
[9]	朱瑶宏，高一民，董子博，柳献. 盾构法T接隧道结构受力足尺试验研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(1): 9-18.
[10]	丁剑敏, 董子博, 莫振泽, 靳永福, 丁謇, 王乃龙 . 顶管法T接隧道现场试验研究分析 [J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(1): 28-34.
[11]	桑运龙, 刘学增, 张强. 基于螺栓-凹凸榫连接的地铁盾构隧道管片环缝接头刚度分析及应用 [J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(1): 19-27.
[12]	张勇, 马金荣, 陶祥令, 李阳. 地面堆载诱发下既有盾构隧道纵向变形的解析解 [J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(1): 66-73.
[13]	叶飞, 韩鑫, 牛若飞, 赵汝亮. 基于纵向沉降曲线的黄土地层盾构土舱压力分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(S2): 53-59.
[14]	曹淞宇, 封坤, 刘迅, 肖明清, 李策, 孙文昊. 纵向力对盾构隧道管片结构内力分配机制的影响分析 ———以苏通GIL 电力管廊隧道工程为例[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(S2): 154-162.
[15]	叶美锡, 丁文其, 陈俊伟, 金跃郎, 刘浩, 涂新斌. 盾构隧道管片接缝三元乙丙橡胶密封垫力学性能影响因素敏感度分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(S2): 200-206.

天津地铁6号线双线平行盾构隧道施工间隔对地表土体变形影响研究

Effect on Construction Intervals on Deformation Characteristics of Surface Soil during Construction of Twintube Shieldbored Tunnels: Case Study on a Running Tunnel of Line 6 of Tianjin Metro

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价