EFPI的地层关联性与复杂地层盾构掘进参数的演化规律分析

doi:10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2021.S2.027

隧道建设（中英文） ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (S2): 215-221.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2021.S2.027

EFPI的地层关联性与复杂地层盾构掘进参数的演化规律分析

黄继辉¹，唐志成²，张晓辉¹，陈小羊³，郭晓¹

(1. 中建海峡建设发展有限公司，福建福州 350015； 2. 中国地质大学（武汉）工程学院, 湖北武汉 430074； 3. 中建七局交通建设有限公司，河南郑州 450004)

出版日期:2021-12-31 发布日期:2022-03-15
作者简介:黄继辉（1986—），男，福建沙县人，2015年毕业于同济大学，地下建筑与工程专业，博士，高级工程师，现从事盾构施工技术，工程数据分析挖掘技术的研究工作。E-mail： 307478086@qq.com。
基金资助:
中建七局科技研发项目(CSCEC7b-2016-Z-2）；福建省住建厅科技研发项目(2020-K-7)

Stratigraphic Correlation of EFPI and Evolution Regularity of Shield Tunneling Parameter In Complex Stratum

HUANG Jihui¹, TANG Zhicheng², ZHANG Xiaohui¹, CHEN Xiaoyang³, GUO Xiao¹

(1. CSCEC Strait Construction and Development Co., Ltd., Fuzhou 350015, Fujian, China； 2. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, China； 3. Transportation Company of China Construction Seventh Engineering Division Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou 450004， Henan, China)

Online:2021-12-31 Published:2022-03-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 盾构掘进参数的演化规律是复杂地层盾构施工中地层感知和大数据分析研究的基础，福州地铁某区间沿线穿越淤泥质土、黏土、碎卵石、强风化和中风化硬岩等16种地层，针对该工程地层复杂的特点，提出考虑土舱压力影响的有效比推力指标EFPI用于表征地层条件的变化，并对依托工程盾构掘进参数的演化规律进行分析，得到如下结果： 1）复杂地层中，EFPI在评估盾构切削围岩的难易程度，区分土层和强风化硬岩上的效果方面优于目前常用的FPI指标。2）EFPI与地层标贯击数呈线性正相关，土—风化岩交互的复杂地层施工中可采用Log(EFPI) =2.3作为划分土层和强风化硬岩地层的判断依据。3）Log(EFPI)和Log(TPI)正相关，Log(EFPI)和掘进速度v反相关，且土层中特征点的离散性很大；而强风化硬岩、强—中风化硬岩过渡段的特征点离散性较小，拟合得到强风化硬岩和强—中风化硬岩过渡段Log(EFPI)和Log(TPI)、Log(EFPI)和v的函数关系。4) Log(EFPI)≤2.3时，建议掘进速度控制以保持土舱压力稳定为主；Log(EFPI) >2.3时，建议根据EFPI数值采用合理的掘进速度以提高掘进效率。

关键词: 复杂地层, 盾构掘进参数, 演化规律, 有效比推力, 地层关联性

Abstract: The regularity of tunneling data is the foundation of stratigraphic perception and big data analysis during shield tunneling in composite strata. A section of Fuzhou metro passes through 16 kinds of strata such as muddy soil, clay, broken pebble, strongly weathered, and moderately weathered hard rocks. According to the characteristic of complex strata for the metro section, the effective field penetration index(EFPI) which considers the effect of chamber earth pressure is proposed, and the regularity of tunneling parameter is analyzed. The results show the following.(1) The EFPI works better than the field penetration index (FPI) in evaluating the difficulty of surrounding rock cutting by TBM and distinction of soil and strongly weathered hard rock. (2) EFPI is proportionally and linearly correlation to the strata standard penetration number, and when tunneling in the soilweathered rock strata,Log (EFPI)=2.3 can be used as the dividing standard of soil and strong weathered rock. (3）Log (EFPI) is positively correlated to Log (TPI), while Log (EFPI) is negatively correlated to the propulsion speed v. The characteristic points in soil layer are with great discreteness, while the characteristic points in the transitional section of strong to moderately weathered hard rock are with small discreteness. Function relationship among Log (EFPI), Log (TPI), Log (EFPI)and v in the transitional section of strong to moderately weathered hard rock is obtained by fitting. (4）If Log (EFPI)≤2.3, the excavation control should be focused on keeping the stability of earth pressure; if Log (EFPI)>2.3，the tunneling speed should be adjusted according to the value of EFPI to improve tunneling efficiency.

Key words: complex stratum, shield tunneling parameter, evolution regularity, effective field penetration index, stratigraphic correlation

中图分类号:

U 45

黄继辉, 唐志成, 张晓辉, 陈小羊, 郭晓. EFPI的地层关联性与复杂地层盾构掘进参数的演化规律分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2021, 41(S2): 215-221.

HUANG Jihui, TANG Zhicheng, ZHANG Xiaohui, CHEN Xiaoyang, GUO Xiao.

Stratigraphic Correlation of EFPI and Evolution Regularity of Shield Tunneling Parameter In Complex Stratum [J]. Tunnel Construction, 2021, 41(S2): 215-221.

[1]	刘继强, 陈晓庆, 张晓东, 乔亚飞. 复杂地层妈湾海底大直径泥水盾构隧道掌子面稳定性数值分析研究 [J]. 隧道建设, 2021, 41(S1): 19-.
[2]	秦佳佳. 合肥地区复合地层盾构掘进参数控制研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(3): 435-443.
[3]	于云龙，管晓明，王旭春，聂庆科，张若凡. 砂黏复合地层盾构掘进参数变化规律及掘进速率预测研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(7): 1125-1131.
[4]	莫振泽，王梦恕，罗跟东，王辉，钱勇进. 土压盾构在富水粉砂地层中浓泥渣土改良技术研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2018, 38(12): 2026-2031.
[5]	吴镇，耿传政，王磊. 富水卵石层土压平衡盾构水下接收技术[J]. 隧道建设, 2018, 38(12): 2040-2045.
[6]	胡珉，樊杰. 基于Kmeans聚类算法的盾构掘进参数设定方法研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2018, 38(11): 1772-1777.
[7]	吴昊. 复杂地层浅埋暗挖地铁区间隧道近距离下穿地下商业街设计及施工关键技术[J]. 隧道建设, 2016, 36(8): 988-996.
[8]	张志奇，李彤，韩爱民，苏明，黄新强. 复杂地层盾构掘进速率和刀盘扭矩预测模型及其地层适应性研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2016, 36(12): 1449-1455.
[9]	张萌，孙骋. 大直径土压平衡盾构在复杂地层中的掘进技术探析[J]. 隧道建设, 2015, 35(S2): 157-161.
[10]	赵立锋, 邓剑峰, 安乐. 地铁盾构下穿浅基础太平北路石拱桥施工技术[J]. 隧道建设, 2015, 35(10): 1066-1070.
[11]	邵利平. 二重管深孔注浆技术在超浅埋暗挖通道复杂地层中的应用[J]. 隧道建设, 2011, 31(增刊2): 171-175.
[12]	汤宪高, 李南, 赵宝华. 视频化信息反馈系统在轨道交通工程建设中的应用[J]. 隧道建设, 2011, 31(3): 354-358.
[13]	赵宝华, 李建华. 繁华城区大直径泥水盾构掘进沉降控制及对周边环境影响分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2010, 30(6): 643-648.

EFPI的地层关联性与复杂地层盾构掘进参数的演化规律分析

Stratigraphic Correlation of EFPI and Evolution Regularity of Shield Tunneling Parameter In Complex Stratum

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 13

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价