• 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
  • 中文核心期刊中文科技核心期刊
  • Scopus RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
  • 美国EBSCO数据库 俄罗斯《文摘杂志》
  • 《日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(中国)》
二维码

隧道建设(中英文) ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (9): 1589-1596.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2022.09.010

• 规划与设计 • 上一篇    下一篇

巨跨洞室二次衬砌结构设计方法研究

宋超业, 吕书清, 贺维国   

  1. (中铁第六勘察设计院集团有限公司, 天津 300131)
  • 出版日期:2022-09-20 发布日期:2022-10-10
  • 作者简介:宋超业(1982—),男,安徽金寨人,2005年毕业于江西理工大学,岩土工程专业,硕士,正高级工程师,主要从事岩土工程设计和岩石力学试验方面研究工作。 Email: scyesky@126.com。

Design of Secondary Lining Structure of a GiantSpan Cavern

SONG Chaoye, LYU Shuqing, HE Weiguo   

  1. (China Railway Liuyuan Group Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300131, China)
  • Online:2022-09-20 Published:2022-10-10

摘要: 针对现有荷载-结构法得出的巨跨洞室二次衬砌结构厚度大、经济性和施工可操作性差等问题,基于某跨度超50 m的巨跨洞室的整体和局部稳定特点,提出巨跨洞室二次衬砌结构承担洞室剩余变形和块体不稳定荷载的作用机制,并论述二次衬砌结构设计的计算过程。得出结果如下: 1)巨跨二次衬砌结构承担洞室剩余变形和不稳定块体荷载这一力学模型符合巨跨洞室整体和局部稳定机制; 2)洞室剩余变形为极限沉降与既有沉降的差值,采用此方法得出的剩余变形值与二次衬砌和喷射混凝土接触压力实测值具有较高的一致性; 3)所提出的不稳定块体荷载是针对洞室薄弱部位重点设计,安全性高; 4)采用本文的设计方法得出的拱部及边墙二次衬砌厚度分别为0.81.4 m,相较于常规设计方法,厚度减少了27~53%。

关键词: 巨跨洞室, 二次衬砌结构设计, 剩余变形, 块体, 不稳定块体荷载

Abstract:  The secondary lining structures designed by existing loadstructure methods often exist with large covering thickness, low economic efficiency, and poor construction operability problems. Therefore, based on the global and local stability characteristics of a giant cavern with a span of greater than 50 m, the mechanism of a giantspan cavern secondary lining structure undertaking residual deformation and an unstable block load is proposed, and the calculation process of secondary lining structure design is demonstrated. The results indicate the following: (1) The mechanical model of the giantspan cavern secondary lining structure bearing residual deformation and unstable block load conforms to the global and local stability mechanism of the giantspan cavern. (2) The residual deformation of the cavern is the difference between the ultimate and existing settlements; the results obtained using the proposed method are highly consistent with the contact pressure of the secondary lining and shotcrete. (3) The proposed unstable block load is designed for the weak part of the cavern with high safety. (4) The secondary lining structure thicknesses of the arch and sidewall obtained using the designed method are 0.8 and 1.4 m, respectively, which are 27%~53% lower than those of the conventional design method.

Key words:  , giantspan cavern, secondary lining structure design, residual deformation, block, unstable block load