地铁盾构并行下穿既有明挖隧道加固方案研究——以济南黄河隧道北岸段地铁下穿明挖公路隧道为例

doi:10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2023.S2.046

隧道建设（中英文） ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (S2): 418-427.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2023.S2.046

地铁盾构并行下穿既有明挖隧道加固方案研究——以济南黄河隧道北岸段地铁下穿明挖公路隧道为例

傅金阳1, 2，张洪瑜1，孙前辉1，张亮亮3，阳军生1，李亚楠4

（1. 中南大学土木工程学院，湖南长沙 410075； 2. 高速铁路建造技术国家工程研究中心，湖南长沙 410075； 3. 中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司，湖北武汉 430063；4. 黄河勘测规划设计研究院有限公司，河南郑州 450003)

出版日期:2023-12-30 发布日期:2024-03-28
作者简介:傅金阳（1985—），男，湖南湘潭人，2014年毕业于德国弗莱贝格工业大学，岩土工程专业，博士，副教授，主要从事隧道及地下工程灾变防控与智能检测技术等方面的研究工作。 Email: jy.fu@csu.edu.cn。

Reinforcement Scheme for OpenCut Highway Tunnel Parallelly-Crossed by Metro Shield Tunnel on North Bank Section of Yellow River-Crossing Tunnel in Jinan, China

FU Jinyang1, 2, ZHANG Hongyu1, SUN Qianhui1, ZHANG Liangliang3, YANG Junsheng1, LI Yanan4

(1. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, Hunan, China;2. National Engineering Research Center for High Speed Railway Construction Technology, Changsha 410075,Hunan, China; 3. China Railway Siyuan Survey and design group Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430063, Hubei, China;4. Yellow River Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou 450003, Henan, China)

Online:2023-12-30 Published:2024-03-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为解决公轨合建水下隧道分离后，地铁隧道长距离并行近接下穿明挖隧道过程中面临的变间距下穿扰动、地层脱空的问题，以济南黄河隧道北岸段地铁下穿明挖公路隧道为依托，建立考虑可张开地层-结构界面和结构变形缝的精细化三维仿真模型，探究不同加固方案下盾构施工对地层脱空及既有结构的影响。结果表明： 1）相比于无加固措施，采用立柱桩加固后，最大地表沉降减少52%，沉降曲线峰值叠加效应得到有效控制； 2）采用立柱桩配合三轴搅拌桩加固，盾构下穿过程中既有结构底板横向最大差异沉降减少43.4%，最大沉降降低47.0%； 3）无加固措施下，盾构掘进导致既有隧道结构底板与地层之间脱空效应明显，最大脱空位移达1.44 mm，相比于三轴搅拌桩加固，采用立柱桩加固更能有效减少结构底板脱空； 4）无加固措施下既有结构最大拉应力增量超限（1 MPa），采用单一三轴搅拌桩加固有增大既有结构注浆范围内拉应力增量趋势，而采用立柱桩配合三轴搅拌桩加固，可有效减少50%的既有结构拉应力增量。盾构并行下穿既有结构时，相比显著强化单一加固措施，综合考虑地层位移控制（防脱空）和结构应力控制的加固措施更加安全有效。

关键词: 地铁盾构, 既有明挖公路隧道, 立柱桩, 三轴搅拌桩, 底部脱空, 结构变形, 应力增量

Abstract: After the separation of the highway and railway in an underwater tunnel, varying spacing underpass disturbance and detachment between soilstructure occurred during a metro tunnel parallelly crossing an existing opencut tunnel. In this study, a case study is conducted on the metro tunnel on the north bank section of the Yellow rivercrossing tunnel in Jinan, China, and a refined threedimensional simulation model considering the detachable stratastructure interface and structural deformation joint is established to investigate the influence of shield tunneling on 〖HJ2.7mm〗stratumstructure detachment and the existing structure under various reinforcement schemes. The results reveal the following: (1) The maximum ground settlement is reduced by 52% and the peak superposition effect of the settlement curve is effectively controlled after the column pile reinforcement is adopted. (2) The maximum lateral differential settlement and the maximum settlement of the existing structure floor are reduced by 43.4% and 47.0%, respectively, during shield tunneling after using reinforcement of column pile and threeaxis mixing pile. (3) The maximum detachment between the tunnel floor and the soil due to shield tunneling is 1.44 mm without reinforcement. Compared with the reinforcement of threeaxis mixing pile, the reinforcement of column pile is more effective in reducing the detachment between the tunnel floor and the soil. (4) The maximum tensile stress increment of the existing structure without reinforcement measures exceeds the control limit, and the reinforcement of threeaxis mixing pile tends to increase the tensile stress increment within the grouting range of the existing structure, while the use of column pile combined with threeaxis mixing pile reinforcement can effectively reduce the tensile stress increment of the existing structure by 50%. When shield tunneling parallelly under existing structure, it is safer and more effective to take the ground displacement control (antidetachment) and structural stress control into consideration than to strengthen the single reinforcement measure.

Key words: metro shield tunnel, existing opencut highway tunnel, column pile, threeaxis mixing pile, stratumstructure detachment, structural deformation, stress increment

傅金阳, 张洪瑜, 孙前辉, 张亮亮, 阳军生, 李亚楠.

地铁盾构并行下穿既有明挖隧道加固方案研究——以济南黄河隧道北岸段地铁下穿明挖公路隧道为例 [J]. 隧道建设, 2023, 43(S2): 418-427.

FU Jinyang, ZHANG Hongyu, SUN Qianhui, ZHANG Liangliang, YANG Junsheng, LI Yanan.

Reinforcement Scheme for OpenCut Highway Tunnel Parallelly-Crossed by Metro Shield Tunnel on North Bank Section of Yellow River-Crossing Tunnel in Jinan, China [J]. Tunnel Construction, 2023, 43(S2): 418-427.

[1]	舒智华, 王定军, 张磊, 王先宝. 多结构物下穿上跨同一既有地铁盾构隧道变形控制研究——以深圳市岗厦北综合交通枢纽工程为例 [J]. 隧道建设, 2023, 43(S2): 504-512.
[2]	潘海泽, 李根, 陈怡西, 罗振华, 韩建强. 基于SEM-IPA的地铁盾构隧道施工安全脆弱性关键影响因素研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2023, 43(6): 936-947.
[3]	张广龙, 吴继忠. 基于SVD的地铁盾构洞门钢环空间形态参数计算[J]. 隧道建设, 2023, 43(1): 58-63.
[4]	孙会良, 胡盛斌, 肖鹏飞, 胡敏. 地铁曲线接收段盾构近距离斜穿既有车站施工风险控制——以南宁轨道交通5号线下穿既有1号线广西大学站为例 [J]. 隧道建设, 2021, 41(7): 1206-1217.
[5]	侯高鹏, 张海涛, 周坤, 冷彪. 基于ObjectARX的地铁盾构区间平面及纵断面快速出图方法研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2021, 41(1): 134-142.
[6]	刘道炎, 谢建斌, 黎忠, 孙孝海. 隐覆溶洞对地铁盾构隧道稳定性影响的数值分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(S2): 151-160.
[7]	刘颖彬, 廖少明, 陈立生, 柳毅强, 顾颖成. 软土盾构近距离下穿地铁双圆隧道变形实测分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(10): 1462-1470.
[8]	李凤远，杨延栋，许华国. 固结黏土地层盾构直接破除排水板关键技术研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(6): 913-918.
[9]	张海涛 . 中间风井内盾构隧道管片局部拆除方案研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(12): 2043-.
[10]	叶宇航，王建，徐文田，刘鑫，柳献. 软土地基大直径地铁盾构隧道衬砌结构受力特性数值分析研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2018, 38(S2): 151-160.
[11]	周坤，王华. 跨孔CT法在地铁工程桩基间距探测中的应用[J]. 隧道建设, 2018, 38(5): 747-752.
[12]	杨小平，林培钦，丛竺，刘庭金. 冻结降温导致地铁盾构隧道漏水的数值与理论分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2018, 38(2): 176-182.
[13]	王建，叶宇航，刘加福，徐文田，柳献. 软土地基大直径地铁盾构隧道运营期衬砌结构受力特性现场测试研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2017, 37(7): 781-787.
[14]	李治国，徐海廷，杨世彦. 富水砂层中盾构隧道联络通道施工技术[J]. 隧道建设, 2017, 37(5): 609-617.
[15]	曹志豪，代志萍，谷雪影. 隔水帷幕深度对苏州地铁隧道结构影响分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2015, 35(6): 535-541.

地铁盾构并行下穿既有明挖隧道加固方案研究——以济南黄河隧道北岸段地铁下穿明挖公路隧道为例

Reinforcement Scheme for OpenCut Highway Tunnel Parallelly-Crossed by Metro Shield Tunnel on North Bank Section of Yellow River-Crossing Tunnel in Jinan, China

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价