高应力-渗流耦合作用下不同节理产状对岩体渗流及其塑性区的影响

doi:10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2022.S2.011

隧道建设（中英文） ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (S2): 80-91.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2022.S2.011

高应力-渗流耦合作用下不同节理产状对岩体渗流及其塑性区的影响

姜海波1，张玉洁1, *，刘雨昕2，惠强3

（1. 石河子大学水利建筑工程学院，新疆石河子 832000； 2. 上海理工大学环境与建筑学院，上海 200082； 3. 重庆交通大学土木工程学院，重庆 400074）

出版日期:2022-12-30 发布日期:2023-03-24

Influence of Various Joint Occurrences on Seepage and Plastic Zone of Rock Mass under High StressSeepage Coupling

JIANG Haibo1, ZHANG Yujie1, *, LIU Yuxin2, HUI Qiang3

(1.College of Water and Architectural Engineering,Shihezi University,Shihezi 832000,Xinjiang,China;2.School of Environment and Architecture,University of Shanghai for Science and Technology,Shanghai 200082,China;3.School of Civil Engineering,Chongqing Jiaotong University,Chongqing 400074,China)

Online:2022-12-30 Published:2023-03-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探讨高应力-渗流耦合作用下不同节理产状对隧洞岩体损伤破坏的影响，基于隧洞高应力、渗流现场监测成果，采用三维离散元软件建立应力-渗流耦合下的节理岩体数值模型，分析节理岩体开挖后渗流场的分布特征，以及不同节理产状对围岩渗流模式、塑性区破坏的影响。结果表明： 1)节理倾角对渗流场的分布形态起主导作用，开挖后隧洞渗流场呈“漏斗状”，随倾角方向发生偏转，形成与之平行的“斜漏斗”，且当倾角越陡，围岩破坏面积越大。2)节理间距对渗流场的变化幅度起主导作用，整体呈现先增大后减小、最后趋于稳定的趋势，且节理间距每减小1/2，塑性区面积增大10.29%。3)节理初始隙宽的不同会改变节理面的渗透性，且沿径向14 m内的隙宽发育主要受高应力-渗流耦合作用影响。

关键词: 节理岩体, 隧洞, 离散元法, 渗流-应力耦合, 节理产状, 渗流场, 塑性区

Abstract:

To explore the influence of different joint occurrences on the damage and failure of tunnel rock mass under the coupling action of high stressseepage, based on the onsite monitoring results of high stress and seepage flow in tunnels, a numerical model of joint rock mass under stressseepage coupling is established using threedimensional discrete element software, and the distribution characteristics of seepage fields after excavation of joint rock masses and the influence of different joint production conditions on the seepage pattern and plastic zone failure of surrounding rocks are analyzed. The results show the following: (1) The joint inclination angle plays a leading role in the distribution pattern of the seepage field, the tunnel seepage field shows a funnel shape after excavation, and the deflection occurs with the direction of inclination to form a parallel "oblique funnel". (2) The larger the inclination angle, the larger the area of surrounding rock destruction; the joint spacing plays a leading role in the change amplitude of the seepage field, and the overall trend is to increase first, then decrease, and finally stabilize. (3) The area of the plastic zone increases by 10.29% for each doubling of the joint spacing; the difference in the initial gap width of the joint changes the permeability of the joint surface, and the gap width development along the radial direction of 14 m is mainly affected by the coupling of high stressseepage.

Key words: jointed rock mass, tunnel, discrete element method, seepagestress coupling, joint obstetrics, seepage field, plastic zone

姜海波, 张玉洁, 刘雨昕, 惠强. 高应力-渗流耦合作用下不同节理产状对岩体渗流及其塑性区的影响[J]. 隧道建设, 2022, 42(S2): 80-91.

JIANG Haibo, ZHANG Yujie, LIU Yuxin, HUI Qiang. Influence of Various Joint Occurrences on Seepage and Plastic Zone of Rock Mass under High StressSeepage Coupling[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2022, 42(S2): 80-91.

[1]	姚志宾, 熊永润, 付廉杰, 全永威, 牛文静, 胡磊. 深埋TBM隧洞岩性界面区围岩破坏特征与支护技术研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2023, 43(1): 102-111.
[2]	蒋长伟, 陈子全, 汪波, 李天胜, 周子寒, 包烨明. 深埋高地应力隧道不同支护时机求解方法对比研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2023, 43(1): 119-130.
[3]	孙智莉, 徐庆强, 贾立翔, 张文轩. 基于FBG智能锚杆的大断面输水隧洞结构健康监测研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2022, 42(S2): 175-180.
[4]	周亚萍, 姜海波. 深埋高地应力水工隧洞地应力特征及岩爆脆性破坏深度预测研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2022, 42(S1): 321-330.
[5]	孙钧, 江宇, 李宁, 汪波, 樊勇. Surrounding Rock of Haidong Water Conveyance Tunnel of Central Yunnan Water Diversion Project: Risks and Countermeasures(滇中引水工程海东隧洞围岩“小变形”试验段前期研究——兼及采用普通预应力锚索的风险与对策) [J]. 隧道建设, 2022, 42(8): 1321-1330.
[6]	李鹏飞, 刘江, 张素磊. 平行4孔山岭隧道渗流场解析解及影响参数分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2022, 42(12): 1996-2005.
[7]	赵雪, 顾伟红. 基于GRA-SSA-Elman的隧洞TBM掘进适应性评价[J]. 隧道建设, 2022, 42(11): 1879-1888.
[8]	柳献, 赵佶彬, 陶静, 钟润辉, 张帆. 输水盾构隧洞管片环缝抗剪机制试验研究——以三门核电站取排水隧洞为例 [J]. 隧道建设, 2022, 42(10): 1703-1711.
[9]	杨益, 李兴春, 李兴高, 蔡志勇, 刘泓志. 土压平衡盾构改良砂卵石土的输送性能研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2021, 41(S2): 299-305.
[10]	邓铭江, 许振浩, 刘斌. Establishment and Application of "1 km+100 m+50 m" Geological Prediction System for ExtraLong TBM Tunnels: a Case Study on Water Supply Project Ⅱ in Xinjiang, China(超特长隧洞TBM施工“115”超前地质预报系统创建与实践——以北疆供水二期工程为例) [J]. 隧道建设, 2021, 41(9): 1433-1450.
[11]	路振刚, 王建华, 朱安平, 潘福营, 李坤, 陈良武. 适用于超小转弯半径的紧凑型TBM设计关键技术研究及应用——以山东文登抽水蓄能电站排水廊道隧洞工程为例 [J]. 隧道建设, 2021, 41(6): 1047-1057.
[12]	杨腾添, 李恒, 周冠南, 郭稳. 软弱地层敞开式TBM超前注浆加固技术研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2021, 41(5): 858-864.
[13]	彭小丽, 王海娟, 杨丰春, 姜海波, 李唱唱. 寒区引水隧洞围岩冻胀特性分析 〖ＪＺ〗〖ＨＴ３Ｈ〗——以新疆布伦口水电站引水隧洞工程为例[J]. 隧道建设, 2021, 41(2): 232-239.
[14]	邓铭江, 谭忠盛. Study on Boring Indexes and Key Issues of Tunnel Boring Machine Cluster Construction of Super-Long Tunnels(超特长隧洞TBM集群掘进分析及施工技术研究) [J]. 隧道建设, 2021, 41(11): 1809-1826.
[15]	孙钧, 江宇, 汪波, 樊勇. 高地应力软岩隧洞挤压型大变形的非线性流变属性及采用让压支护的工程整治研究 [J]. 隧道建设, 2021, 41(10): 1627-1633.

高应力-渗流耦合作用下不同节理产状对岩体渗流及其塑性区的影响

Influence of Various Joint Occurrences on Seepage and Plastic Zone of Rock Mass under High StressSeepage Coupling

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价