Methods for Evaluating
Geological Adaptability of Open-Type TBM（敞开式TBM地质适应性评价方法研究）

doi:10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2025.06.001

隧道建设（中英文） ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 1043-1060.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2025.06.001

Methods for Evaluating Geological Adaptability of Open-Type TBM（敞开式TBM地质适应性评价方法研究）

邓铭江¹，谭忠盛^{2， *}

(1. 旱区水工程生态环境全国重点实验室，陕西西安 710000；2. 北京交通大学城市地下工程教育部重点实验室, 北京 100044)

出版日期:2025-06-20 发布日期:2025-06-20
作者简介:邓铭江（1960—），男,新疆库尔勒人,1982年毕业于新疆农业大学,水利水电工程专业,博士,教授级高级工程师,中国工程院院士,主要从事水利工程建设和水资源研究工作。 E-mail: xjdmj@163.com。*通信作者：谭忠盛， E-mail： zhshtan@bjtu.edu.cn。

Methods for Evaluating Geological Adaptability of Open-Type TBM

DENG Mingjiang¹, TAN Zhongsheng^{2, *}

(1. State Key Laboratory of Water Engineering Ecology and Environment in Arid Area, Xi′an 710000, Shaanxi, China; 2. Key Laboratory for Urban Underground Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

Online:2025-06-20 Published:2025-06-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为量化评价敞开式TBM在复杂地质条件下的施工适应性，解决传统评价方法中指标权重固定及研究对象代表性不足的难题，依托北疆供水二期工程，提出一种基于动态权重的模糊综合评价法。首先，系统分析影响TBM地质适应性的关键因素，选取围岩类别、岩爆、大变形、断层破碎带、富水蚀变带、岩溶发育区、富水裂隙带等7个敏感性指标构建评价指标体系，确定各个评价指标的隶属函数。然后，创新性地引入变权重计算方法，依据不同地质掘进时间与各台设备掘进总时间的比值，计算得到不同地质的变权权重，进而建立适应性模糊综合评价方法。通过模糊运算得到适应性分值，并将其划分为5个适应性等级。最后，对正洞18台敞开式TBM的适应性进行评价，结果表明，适应性差1台，较差2台，一般5台，较好7台，好3台，评价结果与实际掘进情况高度吻合。分析表明，适应性等级为好或较好（85分及以上）的围岩可实现高效掘进，设备平均利用率在35%以上，设备平均完好率在90%以上，平均月进尺在400 m以上。

关键词: 敞开式TBM, 地质适应性, 模糊综合评价法, 变权重分析, 隶属函数, 不良地质

Abstract: In order to quantitatively evaluate the adaptability of open-type TBM under complex geological conditions, and to solve the problems of fixed index weights and insufficient representativeness of the research subject in the traditional evaluation methods, the authors propose a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method based on dynamic weights with the Northern Xinjiang Water Supply Project Phase Ⅱ as the background. First, the key factors affecting the geological adaptability of TBM are systematically analyzed, and seven sensitivity indexes, including surrounding rock class, rockburst, large deformation, fault fracture zone, water-rich alteration zone, karst area, and water-rich fissure zone, are selected to establish the evaluation index system, and the membership function of each evaluation index is determined. Second, the variable weight calculation method is innovatively introduced. Based on the ratio of the tunneling time in different geology to the total tunneling time of each TBM, the variable weight of different geology is calculated, and then the adaptive fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is established. The adaptability score is obtained through fuzzy operation and divided into five levels. The adaptability of 18 open-type TBMs in the main tunnel is evaluated, and the results show that the adaptability is poor for 1 TBM, limited for 2 TBM, moderate for 3 TBM, good for 7 TBMs, and excellent for 3 TBMs, and the evaluation results are highly consistent with the actual situation. The analysis shows that efficient tunneling can be achieved in the surrounding rock with a score of 85 or more for good or excellent adaptability, which can support efficient tunneling with an average utilization rate of more than 35%, an average availability rate of more than 90%, and an average monthly advance of more than 400 m.

Key words: open-type TBM, geological adaptability, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, variable weight analysis, membership function, unfavorable geology

邓铭江, 谭忠盛. Methods for Evaluating Geological Adaptability of Open-Type TBM（敞开式TBM地质适应性评价方法研究）[J]. 隧道建设, 2025, 45(6): 1043-1060.

DENG Mingjiang, TAN Zhongsheng. Methods for Evaluating Geological Adaptability of Open-Type TBM[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2025, 45(6): 1043-1060.

[1]	刘永胜, 陈桥, 张合沛, 李叔敖, 林春刚, 尹龙, 李梦雨. Open TBM Tunnel Intelligent Construction Technology（敞开式TBM隧道智能施工技术研究）[J]. 隧道建设, 2025, 45(4): 816-833.
[2]	苟承志, 刘勇斌, 张晓平, 李馨芳, 刘丙森. 敞开式TBM前置式超前钻探及注浆加固技术研究——在首台国产再制造TBM上的应用[J]. 隧道建设, 2025, 45(4): 834-843.
[3]	张晓平, 刘勇斌, 张春瑜, 李馨芳, 王红武, 刘泉声. 国产再制造TBM在软岩隧道中的防卡机改造研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2025, 45(2): 402-414.
[4]	李宗林, 李庆楼, 张立龙, 郭阳. 敞开式TBM隧洞围岩参数与主机振动相关性分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2024, 44(5): 991-999.
[5]	李林峰, 谭忠盛, 周振梁, 彭文波. 天山胜利隧道敞开式TBM钢管片支护作用效果研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2024, 44(5): 984-990.
[6]	杜立杰, 郝洪达, 杨亚磊, 李青蔚, 张卫东, 刘家驿, 冯宏朝, 贾连辉. 小转弯曲线隧道TBM选型与掘进姿态调控方法[J]. 隧道建设, 2024, 44(5): 1106-1115.
[7]	薛江松, 尹建坤, 陈宏明. 滇中引水工程现浇仰拱全工序施工装备设计与应用[J]. 隧道建设, 2024, 44(3): 605-616.
[8]	游金虎, 谢韬, 刘永胜, 潘岳, 尹龙. TBM隧道撑靴侧壁围岩承载分析与不良地质处理[J]. 隧道建设, 2023, 43(S1): 473-479.
[9]	杜立杰, 张正, 李青蔚, 张卫东, 杜传奇, 刘家驿, 杨亚磊. 双盾敞开式TBM适应性与工程应用对比分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2023, 43(6): 921-928.
[10]	李安云, 张凯, 徐金峰, 谢雄耀, 康元锋. 破碎软岩斜井TBM开挖围岩稳定性及支护优化研究——以可可盖副斜井TBM掘进工程为例 [J]. 隧道建设, 2023, 43(11): 1924-1934.
[11]	文斌. 特长隧道“一洞双机”TBM高效掘进关键技术及应用[J]. 隧道建设, 2022, 42(S1): 433-441.
[12]	李志军, 陈馈, 陈桥, 周毅, 李增, 于京波, 张啸. 关于高原铁路某隧道敞开式TBM开挖直径的探讨[J]. 隧道建设, 2022, 42(5): 807-816.
[13]	方星桦, 姚捷, 徐震, 李晓伟, 夏毅敏, 阳军生. 层状粉砂质泥岩地层TBM隧道围岩稳定性与支护方法研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2021, 41(S2): 320-328.
[14]	杨腾添, 李恒, 周冠南, 郭稳. 软弱地层敞开式TBM超前注浆加固技术研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2021, 41(5): 858-864.
[15]	司景钊, 曾云川, 刘建兵. 复杂地质铁路隧道敞开式TBM施工挑战及思考[J]. 隧道建设, 2021, 41(3): 433-440.

Methods for Evaluating Geological Adaptability of Open-Type TBM（敞开式TBM地质适应性评价方法研究）

Methods for Evaluating Geological Adaptability of Open-Type TBM

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价