• CSCD核心中文核心科技核心
  • RCCSE(A+)公路运输高质量期刊T1
  • Ei CompendexScopusWJCI
  • EBSCOPж(AJ)JST
二维码

隧道建设(中英文) ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (S1): 397-405.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2026.S1.034

• 规划与设计 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于疏散心理及运营安全的水下铁路盾构隧道疏散救援设计

于丽1, 2,  郭晓晗1, 2, 3, *,  王明年1, 2, 刘媛1, 2,  李俊麒1, 2   

  1. (1. 西南交通大学土木工程学院, 四川 成都 610031; 2. 极端环境岩土和隧道工程智能建养全国重点实验室, 四川 成都 610031; 3. 应急管理大学城市安全学院, 河北 三河 065201)
  • 出版日期:2026-06-30 发布日期:2026-06-30
  • 作者简介:于丽(1978—),女,辽宁大连人,2009年毕业于西南交通大学,桥梁与隧道工程专业,博士,教授,现从事隧道及地下工程防灾疏散救援研究工作。 E-mail: yuli_1026@swjtu.edu.cn。 *通信作者, 郭晓晗,E-mail: gxh95@ncist.edu.cn。

Design of Evacuation and Rescue in Underwater Railway Shield Tunnels Based on Evacuation Psychology and operational safety

YU Li1, 2, GUO Xiaohan1, 2, 3,*, WANG Mingnian1, 2, LIU Yuan1, 2, LI Junqi1, 2   

  1. (1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Geotechnics and Tunnelling, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, China; 3. School of Safety Engineering, University of Emergency Management, Sanhe 065201, Hebei, China)
  • Online:2026-06-30 Published:2026-06-30

摘要: 下穿水域的盾构铁路隧道具有难以设置辅助坑道的特点,为解决疏散救援紧急出口(避难所)短缺的难题,在调研总结现有典型水下盾构铁路隧道工程实际的基础上,结合人员在狭长空间及楼梯的疏散心理,采用理论分析等方法,形成水下铁路盾构隧道疏散救援模式、底部疏散廊道及竖井式紧急出口分级设计等内容。研究结论如下: 1)隧道长度超过20 km应考虑火灾,并设置紧急救援站;长度小于20 km以应对列车故障为主,采用竖向疏散模式;在底部疏散廊道功能设计、紧急出口(避难所)数量等方面,应结合隧道长度、下穿水域的盾构段长度、水域段长度分级设计。2)为保证人员长距离疏散的安全感,建议环境照度≥40 Lx,形成不通行救援车辆和通行救援车辆2种情况下,底部疏散廊道横断面及避难区长度设计方法。3)基于人员在黑暗狭长空间及楼梯的疏散心理,制定竖井式紧急出口分级标准,提出扶梯、直梯等疏散辅助设施分级设置标准及每间隔10 m高差增设休息平台的建议。

关键词: 水下铁路隧道, 疏散救援模式, 底部疏散廊道, 竖井式紧急出口, 分级设计

Abstract: There is a lack of sufficient emergency exits (shelters) for disaster prevention, evacuation and rescue, because it is difficult to construct shafts for underwater railway shield tunnels. To address this challenge, the designs of typical underwater railway shield tunnels is summarized firstly. Then, the evacuation and rescue modes are classified, and the hierarchical standards of under-rail evacuation walkway and emergency exits with vertical shaft are specified, based on the evacuation psychology in confined spaces and staircases. Findings are as follows: (1) Emergency rescue stations should be established for tunnels exceeding 20 km in length to deal with tunnel fires, while vertical evacuation modes should be adopted for tunnels under 20 km to deal with the non-fire accidents. The functional design of under-rail evacuation walkway and the quantity of emergency exits with vertical shaft require graded design based on tunnel length, underwater shield section length, and water section length. (2) It is recommended that the ambient illumination be ≥ 40 Lx, to ensure the safety of longdistance evacuation. In addition, the design methods for the cross-section and length of under-rail evacuation walkway are established for both non passing and passing rescue vehicles. (3) The classified standards for emergency exit with vertical shaft and evacuation auxiliary facilities, including escalators and straight ladders are proposed. Meanwhile, the rest platform is suggested to add every 10 m of height difference, considering evacuation psychology in dark confined spaces and stairwells.

Key words: underwater railway tunnel, evacuation and rescue mode, under-rail evacuation walkway, emergency exit with vertical shaft, hierarchical design