• 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
  • 中文核心期刊中文科技核心期刊
  • Scopus RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
  • 美国EBSCO数据库 俄罗斯《文摘杂志》
  • 《日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(中国)》
二维码

隧道建设(中英文) ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (S1): 19-.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2021.S1.003

• 研究与探索 • 上一篇    下一篇

复杂地层妈湾海底大直径泥水盾构隧道掌子面稳定性数值分析研究

刘继强1, 陈晓庆2,*, 张晓东1, 乔亚飞2   

  1. 1. 中铁南方投资集团有限公司, 广东 深圳 518000 2.  同济大学土木工程学院地下建筑与工程系, 上海 200092)

  • 出版日期:2021-07-30 发布日期:2021-08-27
  • 作者简介:刘继强(1971—),男,山东郯城人,2016年毕业于北京交通大学,城市轨道交通专业,博士,教授级高级工程师,主要从事城市轨道交通技术等科研与技术管理工作。E-mail: 13189751839@163.com。*通信作者: 陈晓庆, E-mail: Chenxiaoqing0525@163.com。
  • 基金资助:

    中铁南方2020年度科技创新计划立项课题“复杂地层海底大直径泥水盾构隧道施工控制关键技术研究”; 国家自然科学基金重大项目(52090083

Numerical Analysis of Face Stability of LargeDiameter Slurry Shield Used in Mawan Subsea Tunnel in Complex Strata

LIU Jiqiang1, CHEN Xiaoqing2, *, ZHANG Xiaodong1, QIAO Yafei2   

  1. (1.China Railway Southern Investment Group Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518000, Guangdong, China; 2. Department of Geotechnical Engineering College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Online:2021-07-30 Published:2021-08-27

摘要: 为研究复杂地层条件下泥水压力对掌子面稳定性的影响,依托连续穿越全断面软弱地层、上软下硬地层以及全断面微风化岩层的妈湾海底大直径泥水盾构隧道,分别建立不同地层条件下掌子面稳定性分析三维数值模型,得到掌子面位移分布规律及极限支护应力比。此外,由于既有研究常采用矩形荷载模式对泥水压力进行简化,对比分析实际梯形荷载模式及简化矩形荷载模式对掌子面稳定性分析的差异。结果表明: 1)全断面软弱地层中掌子面位移分布呈现“中间均匀,两端分化”形态,上软下硬地层中自拱顶向拱底大致线性减小;  2)采用切线交汇法获得掌子面的极限支护应力比全断面软弱地层最大,上软下硬地层次之,全断面微风化岩层中最小; 3)掌子面在梯形荷载分布情况下上部土体位移远大于矩形荷载分布情况,且得到的极限支护应力比大于矩形荷载分布,计算中忽略泥水容重影响是不合理的。

关键词: 大直径泥水盾构隧道, 掌子面稳定性, 泥水压力, 复杂地层, 数值分析

Abstract:

A largediameter slurry shield used in Mawan subsea tunnel continuously crosses through fullface soft stratum, uppersoft and lowerhard strata, and fullface slightlyweathered rock stratum. To investigate the influence of slurry pressure of slurry shield on face stability under complex strata conditions, 3D numerical simulation models under different strata are established to obtain corresponding displacement distribution laws and ultimate minimum supportstress ratio of tunnel face. In addition, the rectangular load mode is often used to simplify the slurry pressure in previous researches, the differences between the actual trapezoidal load mode and the simplified rectangular load mode in the stability analysis of tunnel face are compared and analyzed. The results show the following. (1) In the case of fullface soft stratum, the displacement of the tunnel face is relatively uniform in the middle of tunnel face, while it is quite different at both ends, whereas in the uppersoft and lowerhard strata, the displacement decreases linearly from the arch crown to the bottom. (2) The maximum supportstress ratio of the tunnel face obtained by tangent intersection method is the largest in the fullface soft stratum, followed by that in uppersoft and lowerhard strata, and that in the fullface slightlyweathered rock stratum is the smallest. (3) In the case of trapezoidal load distribution, both the upper soil displacement and the obtained ultimate minimum support stress ratio are far larger than that of rectangular load distribution, indicating that it is unreasonable to ignore the influence of unit weight of slurry in calculation.

Key words: large-diameter slurry shield tunnel, face stability, slurry pressure, complex strata, numerical analysis

中图分类号: