基于局部强度折减法的地下洞室群“危险区”破坏判据及其工程应用

doi:10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2023.04.010

隧道建设（中英文） ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 634-644.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2023.04.010

基于局部强度折减法的地下洞室群“危险区”破坏判据及其工程应用

陈以超1，张黎明2, 3， *，丛宇2, 3，王肖珊1，王在泉2, 3

（1. 青岛理工大学理学院，山东青岛 266033； 2. 青岛理工大学土木工程学院，山东青岛266033；3. 青岛理工大学蓝色经济区工程建设与安全协同创新中心，山东青岛 266033）

出版日期:2023-04-20 发布日期:2023-05-23
作者简介:陈以超（1999—），男，山东聊城人，青岛理工大学工程力学专业在读硕士，研究方向为岩石力学与地下工程。Email: cyc1070@163.com。 *通信作者：张黎明， Email： dryad_274@163.com。

Damage Criterion of Danger Zone of Underground Cavern Group Based on Local Strength Reduction Method and Its Engineering Application

CHEN Yichao1, ZHANG Liming2, 3, *, CONG Yu2, 3, WANG Xiaoshan1, WANG Zaiquan2, 3

(1.School of Science, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266033, Shandong, China;2.School of Civil Engineering,Qingdao University of Technology,Qingdao 266033,Shandong,China;3.Cooperative Innovation Center of Engineering Construction and Safety in Shandong Blue Economic Zone,Qingdao University of Technology,Qingdao 266033,Shandong, China)

Online:2023-04-20 Published:2023-05-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为准确评价大型地下洞室群的安全状态，探究基于局部强度折减方法的地下洞室群安全系数求解方法。将屈服接近度(YAI)小于0.1的区域定义为“危险区”，以洞室之间围岩“危险区”贯通作为洞室群整体破坏判据，将“危险区”贯通时对应的折减系数定义为洞室群破坏的安全系数，定量评价洞室群整体稳定性，解析各类洞室群破坏判据计算结果差异。研究结果表明： 1）各判据对应的安全系数从大到小依次为等效塑性应变贯通、塑性区贯通、关键点位移突增、“危险区”贯通； 2）以关键点位移突增为标准，另3种判据求出的安全系数误差分别为33.7%、13.9%、2.6%； 3）基于“危险区”贯通的安全系数计算结果与位移突增判据更为接近，以“危险区”贯通为破坏判据的破坏区与工程实际围岩的破坏特征相符合，计算量更少。

关键词: 地下洞室群, 局部强度折减法, 安全系数, 屈服接近度

Abstract: The method of solving the safety coefficient of an underground cavern group based on the local strength reduction method is investigated to accurately evaluate the safety state of large underground cavern groups. A danger zone is defined as an area with YAI （yield approach index） of less than 0.1. The danger zone penetration of the surrounding rock between caverns is used herein as the criterion for the overall damage of the cavern group. The discount factor corresponding to the danger zone penetration is defined as the safety factor of the cavern group damage. The overall stability of the cavern group is quantitatively evaluated. Moreover, the differences in the calculation results of the damage criteria of various cavern groups are analyzed. The results show that: (1)The order of the safety coefficient of each criterion from large to small is equivalent to plastic strain penetration, plastic zone penetration, sudden increase in displacement at critical points, and danger zone penetration. (2)According to the sudden increase in displacement at critical points, the errors of the safety coefficients of the other three criteria are 33.7%, 13.9%, and 2.6%, respectively. (3) The calculation result of the safety coefficient based on the danger zone penetration is closer to that of the displacement surge criterion; moreover, the damage zone based on the danger zone penetration is consistent with the actual damage characteristics of the surrounding rock of the project. The calculation volume is less.

Key words: underground cavern group, local strength reduction method, safety coefficient, yield approach index

陈以超, 张黎明, 丛宇, 王肖珊, 王在泉. 基于局部强度折减法的地下洞室群“危险区”破坏判据及其工程应用[J]. 隧道建设, 2023, 43(4): 634-644.

CHEN Yichao, ZHANG Liming, CONG Yu, WANG Xiaoshan, WANG Zaiquan. Damage Criterion of Danger Zone of Underground Cavern Group Based on Local Strength Reduction Method and Its Engineering Application[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2023, 43(4): 634-644.

[1]	肖明清, 徐晨, 谢壁婷, 陈文鹏, 王克金. Research on Design Technology of Sequential Supporting for High-Speed Railway Tunnel Constructed by Drilling-and-Blasting Method（高速铁路钻爆法隧道分序支护设计技术研究）[J]. 隧道建设, 2023, 43(3): 369-382.
[2]	蒋长伟, 陈子全, 汪波, 李天胜, 周子寒, 包烨明. 深埋高地应力隧道不同支护时机求解方法对比研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2023, 43(1): 119-130.
[3]	李鹏飞, 吕治鹏, 周烨, 关喜彬, 何旭, 陶琦. 冰水堆积体隧道注浆圈厚度与初期支护受力特性研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2022, 42(S1): 112-119.
[4]	刘新荣, 周伟锋, 周小涵, 庄炀, 王自强. 考虑二次衬砌有效承载厚度的隧道结构安全系数解析模型[J]. 隧道建设, 2022, 42(11): 1844-1852.
[5]	金威，田源，闫自海，王明年. 不同火灾规模下地下共用结构安全性研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(2): 215-222.
[6]	刘建友, 吕刚, 赵勇, 王婷. 应力流守恒原理及地下洞室群支护结构设计方法[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(S2): 220-227.
[7]	肖明清，徐晨. 复合式衬砌隧道总安全系数设计法修正与应用研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(3): 421-429.
[8]	肖明清，陈立保，徐晨，王少峰，王克金. 高速铁路隧道支护参数的计算研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2018, 38(3): 406-413.
[9]	郭树勋，郑世杰，王金满，杨锐，郑帅，姜谙男，孔汇川. 基于屈服接近度的基坑安全性评价方法研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2018, 38(10): 1653-1659.
[10]	白传鹏，郑盘石，王勇，张清光，陈建斌. 浅埋大跨偏压隧道的破坏模式分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2017, 37(S2): 121-127.
[11]	仇文革，雷劲. 上软下硬地层地铁隧道与近接桥梁桩基的相互影响分区研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2017, 37(8): 917-925.
[12]	洪军, 张俊儒. 全风化花岗岩地层特大断面隧道施工过程支护受力分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2016, 36(7): 787-792.
[13]	邓建林. 基于强度折减法的软硬不均地层隧道开挖方法转换时机研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2016, 36(6): 676-682.
[14]	郑颖人，阿比尔的，向钰周. 隧道稳定性分析与设计方法讲座之三：隧道设计理念与方法[J]. 隧道建设, 2013, 33(8): 619-625.
[15]	郑颖人，丛宇. 隧道稳定性分析与设计方法讲座之二：隧道围岩稳定性分析及其判据[J]. 隧道建设, 2013, 33(7): 531-536.

基于局部强度折减法的地下洞室群“危险区”破坏判据及其工程应用

Damage Criterion of Danger Zone of Underground Cavern Group Based on Local Strength Reduction Method and Its Engineering Application

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价