• 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
  • 中文核心期刊中文科技核心期刊
  • Scopus RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
  • 美国EBSCO数据库 俄罗斯《文摘杂志》
  • 《日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(中国)》
二维码

隧道建设(中英文) ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 634-644.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2023.04.010

• 研究与探索 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于局部强度折减法的地下洞室群“危险区”破坏判据及其工程应用

陈以超1, 张黎明2, 3 *, 丛宇2, 3, 王肖珊1, 王在泉2, 3   

  1. 1. 青岛理工大学理学院, 山东 青岛 266033 2. 青岛理工大学土木工程学院, 山东 青岛2660333. 青岛理工大学 蓝色经济区工程建设与安全协同创新中心, 山东 青岛 266033
  • 出版日期:2023-04-20 发布日期:2023-05-23
  • 作者简介:陈以超(1999—),男,山东聊城人,青岛理工大学工程力学专业在读硕士,研究方向为岩石力学与地下工程。Email: cyc1070@163.com。 *通信作者: 张黎明, Email: dryad_274@163.com。

Damage Criterion of Danger Zone of Underground Cavern Group Based on Local Strength Reduction Method and Its Engineering Application

CHEN Yichao1, ZHANG Liming2, 3, *, CONG Yu2, 3, WANG Xiaoshan1, WANG Zaiquan2, 3   

  1. (1.School of Science, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266033, Shandong, China;2.School of Civil Engineering,Qingdao University of Technology,Qingdao 266033,Shandong,China;3.Cooperative Innovation Center of Engineering Construction and Safety in Shandong Blue Economic Zone,Qingdao University of Technology,Qingdao 266033,Shandong, China)
  • Online:2023-04-20 Published:2023-05-23

摘要: 为准确评价大型地下洞室群的安全状态,探究基于局部强度折减方法的地下洞室群安全系数求解方法。将屈服接近度(YAI)小于0.1的区域定义为“危险区”,以洞室之间围岩“危险区”贯通作为洞室群整体破坏判据,将“危险区”贯通时对应的折减系数定义为洞室群破坏的安全系数,定量评价洞室群整体稳定性,解析各类洞室群破坏判据计算结果差异。研究结果表明: 1)各判据对应的安全系数从大到小依次为等效塑性应变贯通、塑性区贯通、关键点位移突增、“危险区”贯通; 2)以关键点位移突增为标准,另3种判据求出的安全系数误差分别为33.7%13.9%2.6% 3)基于“危险区”贯通的安全系数计算结果与位移突增判据更为接近,以“危险区”贯通为破坏判据的破坏区与工程实际围岩的破坏特征相符合,计算量更少。

关键词: 地下洞室群, 局部强度折减法, 安全系数, 屈服接近度

Abstract: The method of solving the safety coefficient of an underground cavern group based on the local strength reduction method is investigated to accurately evaluate the safety state of large underground cavern groups. A danger zone is defined as an area with YAI (yield approach index of less than 0.1. The danger zone penetration of the surrounding rock between caverns is used herein as the criterion for the overall damage of the cavern group. The discount factor corresponding to the danger zone penetration is defined as the safety factor of the cavern group damage. The overall stability of the cavern group is quantitatively evaluated. Moreover, the differences in the calculation results of the damage criteria of various cavern groups are analyzed. The results show that: (1)The order of the safety coefficient of each criterion from large to small is equivalent to plastic strain penetration, plastic zone penetration, sudden increase in displacement at critical points, and danger zone penetration. (2)According to the sudden increase in displacement at critical points, the errors of the safety coefficients of the other three criteria are 33.7%, 13.9%, and 2.6%, respectively. (3) The calculation result of the safety coefficient based on the danger zone penetration is closer to that of the displacement surge criterion; moreover, the damage zone based on the danger zone penetration is consistent with the actual damage characteristics of the surrounding rock of the project. The calculation volume is less.

Key words: underground cavern group, local strength reduction method, safety coefficient, yield approach index