• CSCD核心中文核心科技核心
  • RCCSE(A+)公路运输高质量期刊T1
  • Ei CompendexScopusWJCI
  • EBSCOPж(AJ)JST
二维码

隧道建设(中英文) ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 946-959.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2026.05.004

• 研究与探索 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑平整度影响的锚喷衬砌壁面沿程阻力系数研究

吴梦军1, 2, 钟祖良3, *, 曹鹏1, 2, 丁一凡3, 张建忠4, 陈雯4   

  1. (1. 国家山区公路工程技术研究中心, 重庆 400067; 2. 招商局交通科技(重庆)有限公司, 重庆 400067; 3. 重庆大学土木工程学院, 重庆 400045; 4. 四川沿江宜金高速公路有限公司, 四川 成都 610041)
  • 出版日期:2026-05-20 发布日期:2026-05-20
  • 作者简介:吴梦军(1973—),男,湖南涟源人, 2011 年毕业于重庆大学, 岩土工程专业,博士,教授级高级工程师,现从事隧道及地下工程的设计和科研工作。E-mail: wumengjun@cmhk.com。*通信作者: 钟祖良, E-mail: haiou983@126.com。

Frictional Resistance Coefficient of Shotcrete Lining Wall Surface Considering Flatness Effect

WU Mengjun1, 2, ZHONG Zuliang3, *, CAO Peng1, 2, DING Yifan3, ZHANG Jianzhong4, CHEN Wen4   

  1. (1. National Engineering and Research Center for Mountainous Highways, Chongqing 400067, China; 2. China Merchants Communications Technology (Chongqing) Limited, Chongqing 400067, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China;4. Sichuan Yanjiang Yijin Expressway Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China)
  • Online:2026-05-20 Published:2026-05-20

摘要: 为探究锚喷衬砌表面平整度对隧道通风沿程阻力系数的影响规律,采集3条典型隧道的衬砌表面三维点云数据,引入加权平均偏差作为衬砌表面平整度评价指标,并基于数值模拟方法,系统分析壁面粗糙单元高度、隧道直径和壁面粗糙单元间距对通风阻力的影响。结果表明: 1)平整度值可有效表征锚喷衬砌表面平整度,实测隧道平整度值集中分布于0.4~2.2,与实际工程情况相符; 2)通过对数值模拟结果的系统分析,发现沿程阻力系数随粗糙单元高度的增加而显著增大,随隧道直径的增加而逐步减小,并随粗糙单元间距的增加而相应减小; 3)将沿程阻力系数经验计算公式与数值模拟结果进行对比分析,拟合得出修正系数为1.193,经验证修正后的计算公式与实测数据吻合良好,可显著减小理论预测与工程实际之间的偏差; 4)根据《公路隧道通风设计细则》中混凝土隧道壁面沿程阻力系数0.02的取值标准,给出各典型隧道直径对应的壁面平均粗糙高度与平整度建议取值。

关键词: 隧道通风, 沿程阻力系数, 数值模拟, 壁面平整度

Abstract:

In this study, three-dimensional point cloud data of lining surfaces from three typical tunnels is collected, and the weighted average deviation is introduced as a quantitative indicator for surface flatness. The influence of shotcrete lining surface flatness factors—roughness element height, tunnel diameter, and roughness element spacing—on frictional resistance coefficient in tunnel ventilation is investigated. The results of the study indicate the following: (1) The surface flatness factors effectively characterize the surface flatness of the shotcrete lining, with measured surface flatness values concentrated in the range of 0.4-2.2, consistent with actual engineering conditions. (2) The results of the numerical simulation analysis demonstrate a marked increase in the frictional resistance coefficient with the height of the roughness elements, a gradual decrease with increasing tunnel cross-sectional diameter, and a corresponding decrease with increasing roughness element spacing. (3) Following a systematic comparison and analysis of the empirical calculation formula for the frictional resistance coefficient with the numerical simulation results, a correction factor of 1.193 is determined. The validation process has demonstrated that the revised calculation formula aligns closely with measured data, thereby significantly reducing the discrepancy between theoretical predictions and engineering practice. (4) Based on the recommended value of 0.02 for the frictional resistance coefficient of concrete tunnel walls from the Guidelines for Ventilation Design of Highway Tunnels. Additional values for the average wall roughness height and corresponding surface roughness for typical tunnel diameters are hereby proposed.

Key words: tunnel ventilation, frictional resistance coefficient, numerical simulation, wall flatness