• CSCD核心中文核心科技核心
  • RCCSE(A+)公路运输高质量期刊T1
  • Ei CompendexScopusWJCI
  • EBSCOPж(AJ)JST
二维码

隧道建设(中英文) ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 562-575.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2026.03.010

• 研究与探索 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于分散剂处理的高黏性地层盾构泥饼双路径防控方法

任国平1, 张箭1, *, 丰土根1, 余雪娟2, 张文超3, 方园4   

  1. (1. 河海大学 岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室, 江苏 南京 210098; 2. 江苏省交通工程建设局, 江苏 南京 210004; 3. 中交隧道工程局有限公司, 江苏 南京 211100; 4. 中建三局集团有限公司, 湖北 武汉 430000)
  • 出版日期:2026-03-20 发布日期:2026-03-20
  • 作者简介:任国平(1998—),男,安徽蚌埠人,河海大学岩土工程专业在读博士,研究方向为岩土与隧道工程。E-mail: 18355267268@163.com。 *通信作者: 张箭, E-mail: zhangj0507@163.com。

A Dual-Path Prevention and Control Method for Mud Cakes on Shield Cutterhead in Highly Viscous Formations Based on Dispersant Treatment

REN Guoping1, ZHANG Jian1, *, FENG Tugen1, YU Xuejuan2, ZHANG Wenchao3, FANG Yuan4   

  1. (1. Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, the Ministry of Education, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, Jiangsu, China; 2. Jiangsu Provincial Transportation Engineering Construction Bureau, Nanjing 210004, Jiangsu, China; 3. CCCC Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd., Nanjing 211100, Jiangsu, China; 4. China Construction Third Engineering Bureau Group Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430000, Hubei, China)
  • Online:2026-03-20 Published:2026-03-20

摘要: 为解决泥水盾构在高黏性地层施工中泥饼防控方案存在的盲目性与低效性难题,特别是现有研究普遍未区分预防泥饼形成与处理已形成泥饼2种不同应用场景的机制差异,提出一种基于分散剂的预防-处理双路径协同防控方法。选取9种盾构常用的有机类(如月桂醇聚醚硫酸酯钠、木质素磺酸钠等)和无机类(如焦磷酸钠、六偏磷酸钠等)分散剂,通过预防-处理双路径试验系统评估其效能: 预防路径采用搅拌黏附试验模拟刀盘动态剪切,以黏土黏附质量量化分散剂抑制效果;处理路径结合泥饼崩解试验与黏附力测试,分析残余黏附力削弱能力。系统揭示分散剂类型与其最佳质量分数在2类场景下的差异化影响规律。结果表明: 1)预防阶段,阴离子表面活性剂月桂醇聚醚硫酸酯钠(SLES,质量分数1.0%)与高分子分散剂聚羧酸盐(PCAC,质量分数1.0%)可显著降低黏附率至10.8%~15.0%,且质量分数超过1.0%~2.0%后普遍存在效能阈值; 2)处理阶段,PCAC与SLES复配(1∶1)实现协同增效,泥饼崩解率提升至69.14%(较单一组分提高22.52%~26.03%),残余黏附力降低82.33%,并明确了不同复配比例下的协同效应与成本效益。机制分析表明,分散剂通过增强静电斥力与空间位阻效应显著促进黏土分散。

关键词: 泥水盾构, 刀盘泥饼, 分散剂, 泥饼预防, 泥饼处理, 黏附力, Zeta电位

Abstract: The existing mud cake prevention and control schemes for slurry shield tunneling in highly viscous formations are purposeless and inefficient. Existing studies do not distinguish the mechanical differences between two application scenarios: preventing mud cake formation and treating already formed mud cakes. To address these issues, a dual-path prevention-treatment cooperative control method based on dispersants is proposed. Nine types of dispersants commonly used in shield tunneling, including organic types (e.g., Sodium Lauryl Ether Sulfate and Sodium Lignosulfonate) and inorganic types (e.g., Polycarboxylate and Sodium Hexametaphosphate), are selected. Their efficacy is systematically evaluated through a dual-path prevention-treatment experimental design. In the prevention path, a stirring adhesion test is used to simulate the dynamic shear at the cutterhead, and the adhesion rate is used to quantify the inhibition effect. In the treatment path, mud cake disintegration tests combined with adhesion force measurements are conducted to analyze disintegration capability and the reduction of residual adhesion force. The study systematically reveals the differential influence patterns of dispersant type and its optimal mass fraction in the two scenarios. The results indicate the following: (1) In the prevention stage, the anionic surfactant Sodium Lauryl Ether Sulfate (SLES, 1.0%) and the polymer dispersant Polycarboxylate (PCAC, 1.0%) significantly reduce the adhesion rate to 10.8%-15.0%, with a general efficacy threshold observed when the concentration exceeds 1.0%-2.0%. (2) In the treatment stage, the PCAC-SLES composite (1:1) exhibits a synergistic effect, increasing the mud cake disintegration rate to 69.14% (22.52%-26.03% higher than individual components) and reducing the residual adhesion force by 82.33%, while clarifying the synergistic effects and cost-benefits under different compounding ratios. Mechanism analysis shows that dispersants significantly promote clay dispersion by enhancing electrostatic repulsion and steric hindrance effects.

Key words: slurry shield, mud cake on cutterhead, dispersant, mud cake prevention, mud cake treatment, adhesion force, Zeta potential