高边坡对邻近基坑稳定性的影响研究

中国科学引文数据库（CSCD）来源期刊
中文核心期刊中文科技核心期刊
Scopus RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
美国EBSCO数据库俄罗斯《文摘杂志》
《日本科学技术振兴机构数据库（中国）》

隧道建设（中英文） ›› 2011, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 293-300.

高边坡对邻近基坑稳定性的影响研究

刘继强1，2，田志强1，林志斌3，李元海3

1. 中铁南方投资发展有限公司，广东深圳 518000；2. 北京交通大学土木建筑工程学院，北京 100044；3. 中国矿业大学深部岩土力学与地下工程国家重点实验室，江苏徐州 221008

收稿日期:2011-02-17 修回日期:2011-05-04 出版日期:2011-06-20 发布日期:2011-07-08
作者简介:刘继强（1971—），男，山东郯县人，1996年毕业于长沙铁道学院铁道工程专业，本科，高级工程师，主要从事隧道及地下工程的技术管理工作。

Numerical Analysis on Stability of Foundation Pit at Foot of High Slope

LIU Jiqiang1,2, TIAN Zhiqiang1, LIN Zhibin3 , LI Yuanhai3

1. China Railway South Investment & Development Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518000, Guangdong, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China; 3. State Key Laboratory for GeoMechanics & Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology, Xuzhou 221008, Jiangsu, China

Received:2011-02-17 Revised:2011-05-04 Online:2011-06-20 Published:2011-07-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

深圳地铁5号线上水径车站倚靠城市山地，山地边坡形成的偏压作用对基坑的稳定性存在着不可忽视的影响。为认识这种影响，并考察基坑与边坡之间合理的设计间距，运用FLAC3D软件，对基坑与边坡不同距离下基坑的桩变形、桩弯矩、边坡沉降以及地表沉降等进行了计算分析。研究结果表明：1) 高边坡下基坑施工过程中，近坡桩的最大位移与基坑距边坡距离呈指数衰减关系；远坡桩最大位移与距离呈指数递增关系；当距离为24m以上时，两侧桩的最大位移将趋于稳定。2) 当距边坡距离大于2m时，远坡侧地表最大沉降值y与基坑距边坡距离d大致成指数递增关系，当距离为24m以上时，地表沉降最大值将保持不变。3) 边坡最大沉降值y与d呈指数衰减关系，当距离达到16m以上时，基坑开挖对边坡的影响可忽略不计。4) 基坑整体稳定性系数y与距边坡距离d大致成指数增长关系，当基坑距边坡距离为0m，基坑的整体稳定安全系数最小，为1.80。

关键词: 高边坡, 深基坑, 地表沉降, 数值分析, 稳定性

Abstract:

Shangshuijing Station on Line 5 of Shenzhen Metro is located close to a high slope, therefore,the influence of the distance between the high slope and the foundation pit on the foundation pit stability can not be neglected. In order to understand such influence and to determine the rational distance between the foundation pit and the high slope, FLAC3D software is used to analyze the displacement of the piles, the bending moment of the piles, the settlement of the slope and the ground surface settlement under the condition of different distances from the foundation pit to the high slope. The results show that: 1) In the construction of the foundation pit at the foot of the high slope, the maximum displacement of the piles close to the slope and the distance between the foundation pit and the slope have an exponentiallydecreasing correlation; the maximum displacement of the piles far from the slope and the distance between the foundation pit and the slope have an exponentiallyincreasing correlation; when the distance between the slope and the foundation pit is more than 24m, the maximum displacement of the piles becomes stable; 2) When the distance between the slope and the foundation pit is more than 2m, the maximum ground surface settlement on the side far from the slope “y” and the distance between the foundation pit and the slope “d ” have an exponentiallyincreasing correlation; when the distance is more than 24m, the maximum ground surface settlement becomes stable; 3) The maximum settlement of the slope “y” and the distance between the foundation pit and the slope “d” have an exponentiallydecreasing correlation; when the distance between the slope and the foundation pit is more than 16m, the influence of the foundation pit excavation on the slope can be neglected; 4) The overall stability coefficient of the foundation pit “y” and the distance between the foundation pit and the slope have an exponentiallyincreasing correlation; when the distance between the slope and the foundation pit is 0m, the overall stability coefficient of the foundation pit is the least, being 1.80.

Key words: high slope, deep foundation pit, ground surface settlement, numerical analysis, stability

刘继强, 田志强, 林志斌, 李元海. 高边坡对邻近基坑稳定性的影响研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2011, 31(3): 293-300.

LIU Ji-Jiang, TIAN Zhi-Jiang, LIN Zhi-Bin, LI Yuan-Hai. Numerical Analysis on Stability of Foundation Pit at Foot of High Slope[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2011, 31(3): 293-300.

[1]	黄章君, 杨艳玲, 汤东桑, 张卫中. 大尺寸矩形顶管始发井反力墙数值模拟与监测[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(7): 972-980.
[2]	李慎奎. 武汉地区沙漏型岩溶塌陷数值分析与模型试验研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(7): 981-987.
[3]	陈子健, 闫自海, 甘鹏路, 左凯华. 隧道围岩稳定性改进模糊概率模型及其应用研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(4): 504-511.
[4]	陈楠. 基于IOWA算子的地铁车站深基坑施工安全综合评价[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(2): 202-208.
[5]	赖勇,张帅. 流固耦合作用下浅埋偏压隧道扩建方式研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(S2): 17-27.
[6]	孙九春, 白廷辉. 软土地铁深基坑力学状态的施工控制系统研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(S2): 44-52.
[7]	孙九春, 白廷辉. 软土地铁深基坑开挖过程中围护侧向变形控制方法研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(S2): 308-317.
[8]	叶飞, 韩鑫, 牛若飞, 赵汝亮. 基于纵向沉降曲线的黄土地层盾构土舱压力分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(S2): 53-59.
[9]	马武祥, 许岩波, 肖智广, 许战波. 基于ANSYS Workbench 对螺母与锚杆螺纹联结的数值分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(S2): 169-175.
[10]	张云洪, 季新友, 任勇. 松多隧道路线方案设计综述[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(S2): 261-268.
[11]	张河. 紧邻地铁深基坑悬臂式挡土墙保护及基坑支护设计研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(S2): 294-300.
[12]	刁志刚, 陈钦东, 王智勇. “ 坑中坑” 盾构吊出井施工技术 ———以广州市深层隧道排水系统东濠涌试验段为例[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(S2): 335-344.
[13]	王志杰，唐力，蒋新政，侯伟名，徐海岩，季晓峰. 大断面公路隧道临近溶洞开挖稳定性模型试验研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(S1): 16-24.
[14]	肖子琦，闫治国，周龙，姜弘，马姣蓉. 单双线盾构隧道下穿对油罐群变形影响的数值分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(S1): 257-265.
[15]	汤继新，王群敏，陈文华，黄江华，孙浩. 光纤光栅传感和光电成像技术在地铁深基坑中的应用[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(S1): 361-368.

高边坡对邻近基坑稳定性的影响研究

Numerical Analysis on Stability of Foundation Pit at Foot of High Slope

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价