• CSCD核心中文核心科技核心
  • RCCSE(A+)公路运输高质量期刊T1
  • Ei CompendexScopusWJCI
  • EBSCOPж(AJ)JST
二维码

隧道建设（中英文） ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5): 1096-1105.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2024.05.017

• 施工技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

凤凰山特大断面黄土隧道五步单侧壁导坑法研究

乔明磊1， 李盛1, *， 张建功2， 王起才1, 3， 薛彦瑾1, 3， 陈智刚1   

  1. (1. 兰州交通大学土木工程学院， 甘肃 兰州 730070； 2. 中国十七冶集团有限公司， 安徽 马鞍山 243000；3. 兰州交通大学 道桥工程灾害防治技术国家地方联合工程实验室， 甘肃 兰州 730070)

  • 出版日期:2024-05-20 发布日期:2024-06-22
  • 作者简介:乔明磊(1999—)， 男， 河南许昌人， 兰州交通大学土木工程专业在读硕士，研究方向为隧道工程。Email: 1203761063@qq.com。*通信作者： 李盛， Email: ligwin@126.com。

FiveStep Single SideDrift Method for Fenghuangshan SuperLarge CrossSection Loess Tunnel

QIAO Minglei1, LI Sheng1， *, ZHANG Jiangong2, WANG Qicai1, 3, XUE Yanjin1, 3, CHEN Zhigang1   

  1. (1. College of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China;  2. China Seventeen Metallurgical Group Co., Ltd., Ma′anshan 243000, Anhui, China; 3. Lanzhou Jiaotong University Road and Bridge Engineering Disaster Prevention Technology National Local Joint Engineering Laboratory, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China)

  • Online:2024-05-20 Published:2024-06-22

PDF

122

摘要： 为解决特大断面黄土隧道采用双侧壁导坑法施工进度慢、成本高的问题，以G30连霍高速公路清水驿至忠和段扩容改造工程凤凰山隧道为背景，提出五步单侧壁导坑法。通过数值模拟对比分析双侧壁导坑法、五步单侧壁导坑法、传统单侧壁导坑法和台阶法在施工过程中的围岩变形及钢拱架应力，并结合现场试验段监测数据验证特大断面凤凰山隧道采用五步单侧壁导坑法施工的可行性。结果表明： 1)五步单侧壁导坑法拱顶沉降和水平收敛比传统单侧壁导坑法分别减小3.59 cm和1.31 cm，比双侧壁导坑法分别增大1.4 cm和0.59 cm； 钢拱架应力除拱肩外均小于双侧壁导坑法，最大处减少了70 MPa，钢拱架应力最大值与钢材屈服强度的比值比双侧壁导坑法增大0.04，比单侧壁导坑法减小0.08。2)传统单侧壁导坑法的安全性小于五步单侧壁导坑法，改进后的五步单侧壁导坑法相比双侧壁导坑法能在控制围岩变形的同时加快施工进度，降低施工成本。3)五步单侧壁导坑法中隔壁的最优位置应结合具体工程情况进行单独优化计算，针对本工程而言，其最优位置为45%洞宽。

关键词: 特大断面黄土隧道, 五步单侧壁导坑法, 数值模拟, 现场试验

Abstract:

 The double sidedrift method used in superlarge crosssection loess tunnels is slow in tunneling advance and costly. To address these challenges, a case study is conducted on the expansion and reconstruction project of the Fenghuangshan tunnel from Qingshuiyi to Zhonghe section of the G30 LianyungangKhorgos expressway, and a fivestep single sidedrift method is proposed. The surrounding rock′s deformation and streel arch′s stress when employing the double sidedrift, fivestep single sidedrift, conventional single sidedrift, and bench methods are comparatively analyzed. Finally, the feasibility of the fivestep single sidedrift method for constructing the Fenghuangshan tunnel is validated through field monitoring data. The results reveal the following: (1) The crown settlement and horizontal convergence of the fivestep single sidedrift method are 3.59 cm and 1.31 cm lower than those of the conventional single sidedrift method and 1.4 cm and 0.59 cm higher than those of the double sidedrift method. The stress of the steel arch is less than that of the double sidedrift method except for the arch shoulder, with a maximum reduction of 70 MPa. The ratio of the maximum stress of the steel arch to the steel yield strength is 0.04 higher than that of the double sidedrift method and 0.08 lower than that of the single sidedrift method. (2) The traditional single sidedrift method is less safe than the fivestep single sidedrift method. The improved fivestep single sidedrift heading method, compared with the double sidedrift method, can accelerate construction progress and reduce construction costs while controlling surrounding rock deformation. (3) The optimal position of the partition wall in the fivestep single sidedrift method is 0.45 times the hole width in the Fenghuangshan tunnel and should be adjusted based on actual conditions for further application.

Key words: superlarge crosssection loess tunnel, fivestep single sidedrift method, numerical simulation, field monitoring

主办单位：中铁隧道勘察设计研究院有限公司    主管单位：中铁隧道局集团有限公司

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持：support@magtech.com.cn

粤ICP备19038941号