• CSCD核心中文核心科技核心
  • RCCSE(A+)公路运输高质量期刊T1
  • Ei CompendexScopusWJCI
  • EBSCOPж(AJ)JST
二维码

隧道建设(中英文) ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (9): 1965-1979.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2026.09.011

• 研究与探索 • 上一篇    下一篇

盾尾密封油脂流变性能试验与盾尾击穿失效规律

赵睿, 李树忱*, 万泽恩, 于辰雨   

  1. (中国矿业大学力学与土木工程学院, 江苏 徐州 221116)
  • 出版日期:2026-09-20 发布日期:2026-09-20
  • 作者简介:赵睿(2002—),男,安徽淮北人,中国矿业大学岩土工程专业在读硕士,研究方向为高水压盾尾密封系统击穿失效特征与智能调控。E-mail: 3082819747@qq.com。*通信作者: 李树忱, E-mail: scli@cumt.edu.cn。

Rheological Properties Testing of Shield-Tail Seal Grease and Failure Mechanisms of Shield-Tail Breakdown

ZHAO Rui, LI Shuchen*, WAN Ze’en, YU Chenyu   

  1. (School of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China)
  • Online:2026-09-20 Published:2026-09-20

摘要: 针对高水压盾构隧道施工中因盾尾刷磨损、压缩塑性变形或浆液板结硬化等劣化因素导致盾尾刷与管片之间出现接触失效区域,进而引发盾尾密封系统击穿的关键问题,通过流变性能试验与计算流体动力学(computational fluid dynamics,CFD)数值模拟,揭示盾尾密封油脂的流变特性与接触失效区域尺寸对密封性能的协同影响机制。以2种自制油脂(高流低黏型、低流高黏型)及某市售国际品牌盾尾密封油脂A为对象,采用流变仪开展稳态剪切、动态振荡应力及温度扫描试验,获得25 ℃条件下的黏度-剪切速率关系、屈服应力及黏弹性转变特征。基于实际盾尾密封结构,建立二维CFD数值模型,将盾尾刷简化为多孔介质,模拟8种接触失效区域尺寸(0~15 mm)条件下的盾尾密封系统击穿过程,分析流场、压力传递及失效时间的变化。结果表明: 1)3种油脂均为假塑性流体,高流低黏型油脂、低流高黏型油脂及A油脂的屈服应力分别为5.65、11.41、22.90 Pa。2)当接触失效区域尺寸超过3 mm后,系统击穿时间显著缩短,密封性能急剧下降。对比3种油脂,低流高黏型油脂在所有接触失效区域尺寸下击穿时间最长,A油脂次之,高流低黏型油脂最短。3)盾尾刷-管片接触失效是密封系统性能劣化的关键诱因。低流高黏型油脂抗击穿能力最优,适用于接触失效区域显著发展的工况; 高流低黏型油脂流动性好,适用于小尺寸接触失效区域的快速填充; A油脂性能介于2者之间,表现出低流高黏的增强特征。4)工程中应根据盾尾刷状态动态匹配油脂类型,当接触失效区域尺寸超过3 mm时,需结合盾尾间隙等工程措施进行控制 。

关键词: 盾尾密封油脂, 流变性能, 接触失效, 数值模拟, 失效机制

Abstract: In high-water-pressure shield tunneling, contact failure zones between the tail brush and tunnel segments arise from factors such as wear, plastic deformation, and the caking and hardening of the tail brush, and further compromise the shield-tail sealing system. To address this issue, rheological testing and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are used to quantitatively investigate how the rheological properties of the seal grease and the dimensions of the contact failure zones affect sealing performance. Two custom-formulated greases (high-flow, low-viscosity and low-flow, high-viscosity) as well as a commercially available brand seal grease (Grease A) are taken as test subjects. Steadystate shear, dynamic oscillatory stress, and temperature scanning tests are conducted using a rheometer at 25 °C to measure the viscosity-shear rate relationships, yield stress, and viscoelastic transition characteristics. A two-dimensional CFD model is developed, with the tail brush simplified as a porous medium, to simulate the breakdown process under eight different sizes of contact failure areas ranging from 0 to 15 mm. Variations in the flow field, pressure transmission, and failure time are analyzed. The results reveal the following: (1) All three greases exhibit pseudoplastic behavior, with the high-flow-low-viscosity type, low-flow-high-viscosity type, and Grease A exhibiting yield stresses of 5.65, 11.41, and 22.90 Pa, respectively. (2) When the failure zone exceeds 3 mm, system breakdown times significantly decrease, leading to a sharp decline in sealing performance. The low-flow, high-viscosity grease exhibits the longest breakdown time across all failure zone sizes, followed by Grease A, whereas the high-flow, low-viscosity grease has the shortest breakdown time. (3) Contact failure between the tail brush and the tunnel segment critically affects the sealing system’s performance. The low-flow, high-viscosity grease demonstrates the best resistance to breakdown, making it ideal for conditions with significant contact failure zones. By contrast, the high-flow, low-viscosity grease has good fluidity, making it suitable for rapid filling of smaller failure zones. Grease A offers a balanced performance while exhibiting enhanced characteristics of the low-flow, high-viscosity type. (4) In practical applications, the choice of grease should be tailored to the condition of the tail brush; specifically, when the failure zone exceeds 3 mm, management of the shield-tail gap is essential.

Key words: shield-tail seal grease, rheological properties, contact failure, numerical simulation, failure mechanism