云桂线富宁隧道围岩分级变更分析

doi:10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2018.06.002

隧道建设（中英文） ›› 2018, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (6): 895-900.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2018.06.002

云桂线富宁隧道围岩分级变更分析

刘伟¹，吴朝钢¹，张瑞²，周飞棚¹

（1. 中铁二院昆明勘察设计研究院有限责任公司，云南昆明 650200；  2. 中铁隧道集团四处有限公司，广西南宁 530007）

收稿日期:2017-09-07 修回日期:2018-02-24 出版日期:2018-06-20 发布日期:2018-07-04
作者简介:刘伟(1967— )，男，云南玉溪人，1988年毕业于昆明工学院，地质矿产普查专业，本科，教授级高级工程师，从事铁路、公路、城市轨道交通及工民建等岩土工程勘察工作。Email: liuweikm@163.com。

Analysis of Alteration of Surrounding Rock Classification of Funing  Tunnel on YunGui Railway

LIU Wei¹, WU Chaogang¹, ZHANG Rui², ZHOU Feipeng¹

(1. Kunming Survey, Design and Research Institute Co., Ltd. of CREEC, Kunming 650200, Yunnan, China;  2. The 4th Engineering Co., Ltd. of China Railway Tunnel Group, Nanning 530007, Guangxi, China)

Received:2017-09-07 Revised:2018-02-24 Online:2018-06-20 Published:2018-07-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为提高隧道勘察围岩分级的准确性，减小施工阶段围岩变更率，对云桂线富宁隧道围岩分级变更进行分析，主要结论与建议如下： 1）造成该隧道围岩分级变更的主要原因是物探解译不准、岩溶发育、岩体层间挤压破碎和地下水发育，其中物探解译不准的原因有异常段飘移、断层破碎带解译过宽及解译错误等； 2）岩溶发育造成的变更量也较大，应重视可溶岩段围岩分级的确定，避免出现长段高围岩分级； 3）因岩体层间挤压破碎及地下水发育造成的围岩变更率一般较小，需在施工阶段结合超前地质预报进行变更； 4）地质条件复杂的长大深埋隧道采用可控源音频大地电磁法是适宜的，但应解决物探解译过程中存在的问题，布置钻孔对物探异常区进行验证，提高解译精度； 5）目前采用的综合勘察手段仍是确定铁路隧道围岩分级的主要方法，施工中应重视超前地质预报及施工地质工作。

关键词: 富宁隧道, 围岩分级, 物探, 围岩分级变更, 超前地质预报

Abstract:

In order to improve the accuracy of the surrounding rock classification in tunnel survey work and reduce the alteration rate of surrounding rock classification during tunnel construction, the analysis of alteration of surrounding rock classification of Funing Tunnel on YunGui Railway is carried out. Some conclusions and suggestions are drawn as follows. (1) The main reasons for the alteration of surrounding rock classification of the tunnel are inaccurate interpretation of geophysical prospecting results caused by abnormal drift, overwide interpretation of broken fault and interpretation errors, the karst development, the interlayer crushing of the rock mass, and the groundwater development. (2) The alteration amount of surrounding rock classification caused by karst development is large; hence attention should be paid to surrounding rock classification determination of karst section to avoid long section of high grade of surrounding rock. (3) Due to the interlayer crushing of the rock mass and groundwater development, the alternation rate of surrounding rock classification is generally small, which needs to be alternated combining with advance geological prediction. (4) The geomagnetic method is suitable for the long and deep tunnel with complex geological conditions; however, problems in geophysical interpretation process should be solved; and drilling should be arranged to verify the geophysical anomaly area and improve interpretation accuracy. (5) The comprehensive survey method is still the main method to determine the surrounding rock classification in railway tunnels; and the advance geological prediction and geological work in construction should be paid attention to.

Key words: Funing Tunnel, surrounding rock classification, geophysical prospecting, surrounding rock classification alteration, advance geology prediction

中图分类号:

U 452.1+2

刘伟，吴朝钢，张瑞，周飞棚. 云桂线富宁隧道围岩分级变更分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2018, 38(6): 895-900.

LIU Wei, WU Chaogang, ZHANG Rui, ZHOU Feipeng. Analysis of Alteration of Surrounding Rock Classification of Funing  Tunnel on YunGui Railway[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2018, 38(6): 895-900.

[1]	李好. 新型防爆地震仪在瓦斯隧道超前地质预报中的应用[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(2): 261-266.
[2]	彭都, 刘伟, 赵福玉, 潘建华, 彭建兴. 昆明轨道交通岩溶专项勘察手段及方法[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(S2): 269-282.
[3]	汪旭，孟露，程德胜，卢松. TBM施工隧道管片衬砌段回填注浆质量检测综合物探方法研究及应用[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(S1): 166-175.
[4]	李辉，韩自强，陈棚. 瞬变电磁法在公路隧道地下水预报中的应用[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(S1): 355-360.
[5]	王伟，高星，刘孝卫. 几种初至自动拾取算法在地震波法隧道超前探测中的对比分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(8): 1239-1246.
[6]	王远超，杜雷功，王迎春，章跃林. 深埋隧洞TBM超前地质预报及预处理关键技术研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(8): 1350-1356.
[7]	宋上明. 重庆地区典型土石混合体回填土区隧道围岩分级研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(6): 919-924.
[8]	张照太，游胜，丰光亮，陈竹，陈炳瑞. 高埋深软硬岩互层地质条件下敞开式TBM岩爆段施工方法研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(5): 843-850.
[9]	刘秉峰，张军伟，李雪，祝全兵，任跃勤. 盾构隧道穿越特殊地质围岩位移向量趋势线变形响应特征[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(2): 240-245.
[10]	李涛, 仇文革, 刘毅. 基于数据驱动的隧道地质信息精细化管理系统研发与应用[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(1): 68-74.
[11]	李洋，马留闯，王峰. 古夫隧道软弱围岩普通型机械化配套试验性施工技术[J]. 隧道建设, 2018, 38(8): 1371-1378.
[12]	齐梦学. 极端恶劣地质条件下TBM施工技术与管理探讨[J]. 隧道建设, 2018, 38(12): 2013-2018.
[13]	周华贵，何一韬. 海底岩溶盾构隧道勘察、设计及岩溶处理关键技术研究——以大连地铁5号线火梭区间海底隧道为例[J]. 隧道建设, 2018, 38(11): 1830-1835.
[14]	王小林，黄彦波. 中外高地应力软岩隧道大变形工程技术措施对比分析——以兰渝铁路木寨岭隧道与瑞士圣哥达基线隧道为例[J]. 隧道建设, 2018, 38(10): 1621-1629.
[15]	侯伟清，张星煜，叶英. 基于地震波反射法的盾构施工超前地质预报初探[J]. 隧道建设, 2017, 37(8): 1003-1010.

云桂线富宁隧道围岩分级变更分析

Analysis of Alteration of Surrounding Rock Classification of Funing  Tunnel on YunGui Railway

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价