ISSN 2096-4498

   CN 44-1745/U

二维码

Research on Construction Methods for Large Crosssection Loess Tunnels

  • SHI Lei ,
  • HOU Xiaojun ,
  • WU Jinguang
Expand
  • (1. China Railway 7th Bureau Group Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou 450016, Henan, China; 2. China Railway First Bureau Group Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710000, Shaanxi, China)

Received date: 2012-10-29

  Revised date: 2012-12-20

  Online published: 2013-03-23

Abstract

Site monitoring is made during the construction of Dunliang tunnel. Comparison and contrast are made, on basis of the monitoring results, among double side drift method, single side drift method and threebench method in terms of advantages, disadvantages and applicability. Conclusions drawn are as follows: Double side drift method has high safety coefficient, high applicability and obvious relaxcontrol effect, but has high cost; Single side drift method has little disturbance to the rock mass, but has slow construction advance rate; Threebench method has obvious advantages in construction advance rate, but has poor deformationcontrol effect in adverse geological conditions; Countermeasures, such as timely ring forming, footlocking bolts and good control of the distance between the tunnel face and the invert, have good effect in deformation control.

Cite this article

SHI Lei , HOU Xiaojun , WU Jinguang . Research on Construction Methods for Large Crosssection Loess Tunnels[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2013 , 33(3) : 173 -178 . DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.1672-741X.2013.03.001

Outlines

/

〈 〉