ISSN 2096-4498

   CN 44-1745/U

二维码

Comments on Distance between Primary Support/Secondary Lining and Working Face of Intercity Underground Railway Tunnels

  • NIE Zhenyu
Expand
  • (Xiamen Engineering Co., Ltd. of CCCC First Highway Engineering Bureau, Dongguan 523400, Guangdong, China)

Received date: 2013-12-03

  Revised date: 2014-02-24

  Online published: 2014-04-25

Abstract

In this article, the construction cycle time and construction model of Songshanhu tunnel on DongguanHuizhou intercity railway are analyzed, and comparison and contrast is made between national railway tunnels and intercity railway tunnel. It is believed that the requirements specified in Tiejianshe No. [2010]120 are not applicable to the construction of intercity railway tunnels. Proposals made are follows: 1) For intercity railway tunnels in Grade Ⅵ surrounding rock, the distance between the primary support and the working face should be optimized from 35 m to 50 m, and the distance between the secondary lining and the working face should be optimized form 70 m to 85 m; 2) For tunnels in Grade Ⅴ surrounding rock, the distance between the primary support and the working face should be optimized from 35 m to 55 m, and the distance between the secondary lining and the working face should be optimized form 70 m to 90 m; 3) For tunnel in Grade Ⅳ surrounding rock, the distance between the primary support and the working face should be optimized from 35 m to 65 m, and the distance between the secondary lining and the working face should be optimized from 90 m to 120 m. 

Cite this article

NIE Zhenyu . Comments on Distance between Primary Support/Secondary Lining and Working Face of Intercity Underground Railway Tunnels[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2014 , 34(4) : 356 -361 . DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.1672-741X.2014.04.011

Outlines

/

〈 〉