ISSN 2096-4498
CN 44-1745/U
ISSN 2096-4498
CN 44-1745/U
Excavation Scheme Comparison and Secondary Support Installation Timing of Highway Tunnel in Watercontaining Poorlycemented Powderfine Sandstone
Received date: 2014-05-05
Revised date: 2014-06-25
Online published: 2014-09-22
Watercontaining poorlycemented powderfine sandstone embodies the characteristics of low adhesive strength, poor stability and serious plasticized deformation, which may lead to the nonuniform, nonlinear and asymmetrical deformation of the tunnel support in time and space, and in the end may lead to collapse and failure of the structure. In the paper, case study is made on a highway tunnel located in watercontaining poorlycemented powderfine sandstone. Doublelayer support is proposed to strengthen the primary support and to provide the installation condition of the secondary lining on basis of the principle of “stress releasing before stress control”. Furthermore, the crown settlement, horizontal convergence and plasticized zone distribution of 3bench 7step excavation method, CRD excavation method and doublesidedrift excavation method are analyzed by means of FLAC3D. Conclusions drawn are as follows: 1) CRD excavation method is the best excavation method for the tunnel with 120 m2 crosssection area located in the described strata; 2) The best timing of secondary primary support construction is before the excavation of the right part of the top heading; 3) Under proper conditions, CRD method with four parts should be transferred to CRD method with six parts.
DONG Lei , SONG Hongyan . Excavation Scheme Comparison and Secondary Support Installation Timing of Highway Tunnel in Watercontaining Poorlycemented Powderfine Sandstone[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2014 , 34(9) : 849 -856 . DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.1672-741X.2014.09.006
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |