现浇成型综合管廊不均匀沉降裂缝分析——以福州东南快速通道综合管廊为例

doi:10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2021.12.010

隧道建设（中英文） ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (12): 2098-2105.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2021.12.010

现浇成型综合管廊不均匀沉降裂缝分析——以福州东南快速通道综合管廊为例

杨钊^{1, 2, 3, 4}，李勇智^{1, 2, 3，*}，杨睿^{1,
2, 3}

(1. 中交第二航务工程局有限公司，湖北武汉 430040；2. 长大桥梁建设施工技术交通行业重点试验室，湖北武汉 430040； 3. 交通运输行业交通基础设施智能制造技术研发中心，湖北武汉 430040； 4. 同济大学岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室，上海 200092)

出版日期:2021-12-20 发布日期:2022-01-05
作者简介:杨钊(1984—)，男，湖北洪湖人，2010年毕业于同济大学，岩土工程专业，博士，高级工程师，主要从事隧道及地下结构工程相关研究工作。E-mail： yangzhaolp@126.com。*通信作者：李勇智， E-mail： 1282363881@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2017YFC0805004)

Analysis on Cracks of Cast-in-Place Utility Tunnel Induced by Uneven Settlement: a Case Study of Utility Tunnel of Fuzhou Southeast Freeway

YANG Zhao^{1, 2, 3, 4}, LI Yongzhi^{1, 2, 3, *}, YANG Rui^{1, 2, 3}

(1. CCCC Second Harbour Engineering Company Ltd., Wuhan 430040, Hubei, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Large-span Bridge Construction Technology, Wuhan 430040, Hubei, China; 3. Research and Development Center of Transport Industry of Intelligent Manufacturing Technologies of Transport Infrastructure, Wuhan 430040, Hubei, China; 4. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

Online:2021-12-20 Published:2022-01-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 城市综合管廊作为城市正常运作的生命线工程，其结构开裂不仅影响外观，而且会带来地下水渗漏问题，降低结构及相关设备的耐久性。以福州东南快速通道综合管廊为例，为研究管廊结构开裂的原因，对管廊施工期沉降监测数据进行分析，并采用有限元法及裂缝扩展有限元法进行数值模拟，得出结论： 1）试验段管廊施工时，管廊地基土体出现流失，造成后期管廊不均匀沉降和变形缝错台，这是引起大里程段管廊开裂的根本原因； 2）压重混凝土施工后，大里程段出现不均匀沉降，管廊中部K3+917位置附近顶板局部拉应力超过混凝土抗拉强度标准值，顶板出现初始裂缝； 3）随着变形缝两侧管廊沉降差增大，变形缝错台，出现涌水涌砂，顶板裂缝向中墙和侧墙扩展。

关键词: 现浇成型综合管廊, 不均匀沉降, 裂缝, 扩展有限元法

Abstract: Utility tunnels are typically regarded as lifelines of a city, whereas the cracks of the utility tunnel structure affect the appearance, cause groundwater leakage, and reduce the durability of the structures and related equipment. In order to explore the causes of cracking of the utility tunnel of Fuzhou Southeast freeway in China, the settlement monitoring data of the utility tunnel during construction are analyzed, and the finite element method of crack propagation is used for numerical simulation. Conclusions are drawn as follows: (1) During the construction of the utility tunnel in the test section, the soil loss occurred in the foundation, resulting in the uneven settlement of the utility tunnel and the dislocation of deformation joints, which is the root cause of the utility tunnel cracks in the largemileage section. (2) After constructing the compacted concrete, an uneven settlement occurred in the large-mileage section, and the local tensile stress of the roof near section K3+917 in the middle of the utility tunnel exceeds the standard value of concrete tensile strength, resulting in roof cracks. (3) The deformation joints dislocated with the increase in the settlement difference of the utility tunnel on both sides of the deformation joint, causing water and sand gushing and the expansion of roof cracks toward the middle and sidewalls.

Key words: cast-in-place utility tunnel, uneven settlement, crack, extended finite element method

中图分类号:

U 45

杨钊, 李勇智, 杨睿.

现浇成型综合管廊不均匀沉降裂缝分析——以福州东南快速通道综合管廊为例 [J]. 隧道建设, 2021, 41(12): 2098-2105.

YANG Zhao, LI Yongzhi, YANG Rui.

Analysis on Cracks of Cast-in-Place Utility Tunnel Induced by Uneven Settlement: a Case Study of Utility Tunnel of Fuzhou Southeast Freeway [J]. Tunnel Construction, 2021, 41(12): 2098-2105.

[1]	王滔, 王民, 彭祝涛, 肖丽. 沉管隧道沥青路面服役现状及病害分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(S1): 429-435.
[2]	周红芳. 木寨岭公路隧道高弹模PVA合成纤维喷射混凝土抗裂技术研究与探讨[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(4): 490-495.
[3]	周广平. 京张高铁东花园长大明挖隧道衬砌结构变形特征研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(3): 316-325.
[4]	肖明清, 张忆, 薛光桥. 盾构法隧道管片环缝面不平整对结构受力影响研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(2): 153-161.
[5]	贺志勇, 钟宏武, 陈振华. 带裂缝隧道衬砌的安全评价及有限元分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(S2): 69-77.
[6]	刘国良. 荷载作用下单裂缝锂渣混凝土的氯离子传输试验[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(S1): 80-87.
[7]	张琳，张东明，黄宏伟. 前海湾大直径盾构隧道局部渗流对周边建筑物的影响分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(S1): 212-219.
[8]	来弘鹏，黄鹏志，刘禹阳，刘俊平. 董志黄土塬地区浅埋隧道施工地表纵向裂缝发展时空规律研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(8): 1232-1238.
[9]	张鸿昆，王立川，练发胜，刘志强，吴剑，龚伦，王刚. 某铁路明洞拱部裂缝成因分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2018, 38(5): 764-770.
[10]	陈志敏，蔺鹏臻，冯亚松. 砂质黄土地下车站分幅施工变形规律研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2017, 37(8): 966-972.
[11]	闫鹏飞，蔡永昌. 初始损伤条件下地铁管片力学特性试验研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2017, 37(7): 822-831.
[12]	朱叶艇. 大断面异形盾构隧道弯矩传递系数原型加载试验研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2017, 37(10): 1269-1275.
[13]	鞠向伟，彭海龙，高培伟，姚应征，马爱群，张骏. 适用于隧道混凝土裂缝修补的水性环氧树脂改性砂浆性能研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2016, 36(4): 398-402.
[14]	逄锦伟. 渗透结晶型混凝土裂缝自修复材料试验研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2015, 35(S2): 32-36.
[15]	张晓光. 小直径盾构隧道管片抗弯承载试验研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2015, 35(6): 521-526.

现浇成型综合管廊不均匀沉降裂缝分析——以福州东南快速通道综合管廊为例

Analysis on Cracks of Cast-in-Place Utility Tunnel Induced by Uneven Settlement: a Case Study of Utility Tunnel of Fuzhou Southeast Freeway

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价