松散岩堆体地层下城市隧道洞口段施工方案变更合理性研究

doi:10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2021.S1.033

隧道建设（中英文） ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (S1): 265-.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2021.S1.033

松散岩堆体地层下城市隧道洞口段施工方案变更合理性研究

张航¹，彭雪峰²，周扬¹，曾文浩¹，杨文波^{1, *}

(1. 西南交通大学交通隧道工程教育部重点实验室，四川成都 610031；2. 四川公路桥梁建设集团有限公司，四川成都 610041）

出版日期:2021-07-30 发布日期:2021-08-29

Study on Rationality of Modified Construction Method of Urban Tunnel Portal under Loose Deposits

ZHANG Hang¹, PENG Xuefeng², ZHOU Yang¹, ZENG Wenhao¹, YANG Wenbo^{1, *}

(1. Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering of Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, China; 2. Sichuan Highway and Bridge Construction Group Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China)

Online:2021-07-30 Published:2021-08-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 重庆某公路隧道为双向5车道城市隧道，洞口段穿越由城市建设回填土组成的松散岩堆体，左洞在施工过程中发生了冒顶事故，并出现了大变形、支护开裂、地表裂缝等不良现象。为探究事故发生原因，并验证变更后方案的合理性，首先，对原方案现场监测结果进行分析；在此基础上，采用FLAC3D软件进行数值模拟计算，并与现场监测结果进行对比，验证结果的可靠性；最后，分析不同施工方案所产生的洞周位移、支撑结构应力与塑性区等内容，得出以下结论： 1）原方案采用三台阶七步法施工，支护未能及时封闭成环，变更后的施工方案能够有效控制围岩位移，且能够提高隧道洞周变形协调性。2）原施工方案中的初期支护存在明显的应力集中现象，最大拉压力超过结构容许值，同时围岩应力较大。通过对比发现，增大超前加固范围有助于减小初期支护所受的围岩压力、改善支护结构所受应力状态。3）变更后施工方案的土体受破坏区域小，变更后的施工方案能够减小隧道施工对周围环境的影响。该研究成果适用于松散岩堆体地层条件下隧道洞口段的开挖。

关键词:

城市隧道, 大断面隧道, 隧道洞口段, 松散岩堆体, 变更方案, 数值模拟

Abstract:

A highway tunnel in Chongqing is a twoway fivelane urban tunnel. The portal section of the tunnel passes through the loose deposits composed of urban construction backfill. During the construction of the left tunnel, the tunnel crown collapsed, and there are some adverse phenomena such as large deformation, support cracking, and surface crack. To explore the causes of the accident and verify the rationality of the modified scheme, the field monitoring results of the original scheme are analyzed. On this basis, the numerical simulation software FLAC3D is used, and the calculation results are compared with the field monitoring data to verify the reliability of the results. Finally, the displacement around the tunnel, the stress of the support structure, and the plastic zone induced by different construction schemes are analyzed. Some conclusions are drawn as follows. (1) In original construction scheme, threebench and sevenstep construction method is adopted, and the support cannot be closed to form a ring in time; whereas the modified construction scheme can effectively control the surrounding rock displacement, and improve the coordination of deformation around the tunnel. (2) In original construction scheme, the primary support shows obvious stress concentration phenomenon, the maximum tensile pressure exceeds the allowable value of the structure, and the surrounding rock stress is large; whereas the advance reinforcement scope is enlarged in the modified scheme, which can reduce the surrounding rock pressure of the primary support and improve the stress state of the support structure. (3) The plastic area of the modified construction scheme is obviously smaller than that of the original one, and the damaged area of the soil is small; the modified construction scheme can reduce the impact of tunnel construction on the surrounding environment. The research results are applicable to the excavation of tunnel portal section under the condition of loose deposits.

Key words: urban tunnel, large crosssection tunnel, tunnel portal section, loose deposits, construction plan adjustment, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

U 455

张航, 彭雪峰, 周扬, 曾文浩, 杨文波. 松散岩堆体地层下城市隧道洞口段施工方案变更合理性研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2021, 41(S1): 265-.

ZHANG Hang, PENG Xuefeng, ZHOU Yang, ZENG Wenhao, YANG Wenbo.

Study on Rationality of Modified Construction Method of Urban Tunnel Portal under Loose Deposits [J]. Tunnel Construction, 2021, 41(S1): 265-.

[1]	朱叶艇, 张子新, 朱雁飞. 不同边界条件对异形盾构管片接头力学性能的影响研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2022, 42(6): 1003-1013.
[2]	黄建国, 俞缙, 李小刚, 林聪波. 超大断面隧道不同加宽段围岩变形及围岩压力监测分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2021, 41(S2): 115-122.
[3]	夏海, 徐光阳, 傅金阳, 肖欧辉, 张跃辉, 赵宁宁, 阳军生. 黄土隧道三台阶施工预制临时仰拱技术及应用研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2021, 41(S1): 431-.
[4]	李豪杰. 新建隧道管幕法下穿既有铁路路基施工技术研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2021, 41(S1): 440-.
[5]	TONG Jianjun, LIU Dagang, ZHANG Xiao, WANG Zhilong, ZHAO Siguang, LI Jiawang. Design Method for Support Structure of Large Crosssection Tunnels in Hubei on ZhengzhouWanzhou Railway Constructed by Mechanized Means（大断面隧道机械化施工支护结构设计方法）[J]. 隧道建设, 2021, 41(1): 116-125.
[6]	于介. 黄土塬区浅埋大断面隧道施工变形分析与控制技术[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(12): 1709-1716.
[7]	宋斌，董长松，郭春，王欣，宋骏修. 秦岭天台山大断面高速公路隧道降尘除尘方案研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(S1): 101-109.
[8]	潘国兵，牛茂钦，刘圳，赵宁雨，李梦城, 李华蓉. 隧道洞口段驾驶人眼滞后特性研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(7): 1090-1096.
[9]	谢卓吾，叶万军，刘禹阳. 大断面上新统红色泥岩（N^Cr₂）隧道支护受力特征研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(4): 609-618.
[10]	叶万军，吴云涛，陈明，刘江涛. 大断面古土壤隧道围岩压力分布规律及支护结构受力特征分析——以银西高铁早胜3号隧道为例[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(3): 355-361.
[11]	杨学奇，杨涅，姚萌. 基于强度折减法和现场监控量测的大断面隧道开挖工法适用性研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2018, 38(S2): 161-168.
[12]	马栋. 复杂地质条件下三线车站隧道施工方案优化研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2018, 38(S2): 253-260.
[13]	刘江，王军，徐腾辉. 涨壳式预应力中空锚杆在机械化开挖大断面隧道中的施工应用研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2018, 38(S2): 324-329.
[14]	王志坚. 郑万高铁隧道大断面机械化施工关键技术研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2018, 38(8): 1257-1270.
[15]	王明年，赵思光，张霄. 郑万高铁大型机械化施工隧道位移控制基准研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2018, 38(8): 1271-1278.

松散岩堆体地层下城市隧道洞口段施工方案变更合理性研究

Study on Rationality of Modified Construction Method of Urban Tunnel Portal under Loose Deposits

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价