• CSCD核心中文核心科技核心
  • RCCSE(A+)公路运输高质量期刊T1
  • Ei CompendexScopusWJCI
  • EBSCOPж(AJ)JST
二维码

隧道建设(中英文) ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (7): 1307-1316.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2025.07.007

• 研究与探索 • 上一篇    下一篇

城市隧道中电动汽车与燃油汽车火灾重点排烟效果对比分析

施勇1, 王亮2, *, 亢燕铭1, 钟珂1   

  1. (1. 东华大学环境科学与工程学院, 上海 201620; 2. 上海市隧道工程轨道交通设计研究院, 上海 200030)
  • 出版日期:2025-07-20 发布日期:2025-07-20
  • 作者简介:施勇(2000—),男,江西赣州人,东华大学土木工程专业在读硕士,研究方向为隧道火灾防排烟。E-mail: shiyong0708@163.com。*通信作者: 王亮, E-mail: 583174453@qq.com。

Comparative Analysis of Smoke Extraction Efficacy for Electric Vehicle and Internal Combustion Engine Vehicle Fires in Urban Tunnels

SHI Yong1, WANG Liang2, *, KANG Yanming1, ZHONG Ke1   

  1. (1. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China; 2. Shanghai Tunnel Engineering & Rail Transit Design and Research Institute, Shanghai 200030, China)
  • Online:2025-07-20 Published:2025-07-20

摘要: 为探究电动汽车与燃油汽车2种车型火灾后的隧道内疏散环境差异,依托上海市某隧道工程,采用数值模拟研究电动汽车燃烧反应产生的热量和烟气,系统分析并对比在现有排烟系统作用下,2种车型火灾后的隧道内能见度、温度及烟气分布等关键环境参数,量化电动汽车相对于燃油汽车火灾环境的恶化率。研究结果表明: 1)电动汽车火灾显著恶化了隧道疏散环境,其发生火灾时的隧道内能见度危险范围长度和安全时间的相对恶化率分别为58.3%和51.8%。2)电动汽车与燃油汽车的火灾高温危害强度关系存在临界时刻,在此时刻之前,电动汽车对应的环境温度较低;在此之后,电动汽车火灾温度显著升高,高温危害加剧,使得温度安全疏散时间比燃油汽车至少缩短25%,因此应当在火灾前期迅速开展其他灭火救援措施。3)电动汽车火灾时烟层高度低于2 m的范围,比燃油汽车高31.6%,烟气纵向蔓延长度增加30.8%,烟气危害更广泛、更严重。

关键词: 城市隧道, 隧道火灾, 电动汽车, 燃油汽车, 排烟效果

Abstract: To investigate differences in evacuation environments in tunnels following fires involving electric vehicles (EVs) and internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles, a case study is conducted on a tunnel project in Shanghai. Numerical simulation is employed to examine the heat and smoke generated by the combustion of EVs. Key environmental parameters, including tunnel visibility, temperature, and smoke distribution after fires involving the two vehicle types are systematically analyzed and compared under the effect of the existing exhaust system. The deterioration rate of the fire environment for EVs relative to ICE vehicles is quantified. The results demonstrate that: (1) EV fires significantly worsen the tunnel evacuation environment. When an EV catches fire, the relative deterioration rates of the hazardous visibility range length and the safe evacuation time within the tunnel are 58.3% and 51.8%, respectively. (2) A critical point exists at which the intensity of high-temperature hazards shifts between EV and ICE vehicle fires. Before this point, the environmental temperature of EV fires is lower; beyond it, the temperature significantly increases, reducing the temperature-safe evacuation time for EVs by at least 25% compared to ICE vehicles. Therefore, additional firefighting and rescue measures should be implemented promptly during the early stages of an EV fire. (3) In the event of an EV fire, the range where the smoke layer height is less than 2 m is 31.6% greater than that for an ICE vehicle. Moreover, the longitudinal spread length of the smoke increases by 30.8%, resulting in more extensive and severe smoke hazards.

Key words: urban tunnel, tunnel fire, electric vehicle, internal combustion vehicle, smoke extraction efficacy