铁路隧道装配式仰拱结构施工过程力学性能

doi:10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2026.04.015[

隧道建设（中英文） ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4): 828-839.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2026.04.015[

铁路隧道装配式仰拱结构施工过程力学性能

赵晓勇^{1, 2}，李国良^{1, 2}，王新东^{1, 2}，高新强³，熊伟⁴，郭显所⁵

(1. 极端环境岩土和隧道智能建养全国重点实验室，陕西西安 710043； 2. 特殊复杂环境下长大隧道建造技术铁路行业工程研究中心，陕西西安 710043； 3. 石家庄铁道大学省部共建交通工程结构力学行为与系统安全国家重点实验室，河北石家庄 050043； 4. 国家铁路局，北京 100038； 5. 中铁二十二局集团有限公司，北京 100043)

出版日期:2026-04-20 发布日期:2026-04-20
作者简介:赵晓勇（1982—），男，河南漯河人，2008年毕业于北京交通大学，桥梁与隧道工程专业，硕士，正高级工程师，现从事隧道及地下工程设计与研究工作。E-mail： fsdi_1@163.com。

Mechanical Properties of Prefabricated Inverted Arch Structures in Railway Tunnels During Construction

ZHAO Xiaoyong^{1, 2}, LI Guoliang^{1, 2}, WANG Xindong^{1, 2}, GAO Xinqiang³, XIONG Wei⁴, GUO Xiansuo⁵

(1. State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Geotechnics and Tunnelling, Xi′an 710043, Shaanxi, China; 2. Engineering Research Center of Railway Industry for Long Tunnel Construction Technology of Special Complex Environment, Xi′an 710043, Shaanxi, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and System Safety of Traffic Engineering Structures, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang 050043, Hebei, China; 4. National Railway Administration of the People′s Republic of China, Beijing 100038, China; 5. China Railway 22nd Bureau Group Corporation Limited, Beijing 100043, China)

Online:2026-04-20 Published:2026-04-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为解决铁路隧道洞内绿色、智能化施工问题，结合天陇铁路腰坡隧道，首先，提出5种装配式仰拱结构设计形式，对吊装孔布置开展受力测试与理论计算分析对比；其次，对不同车辆荷载作用下结构受力、纵向张拉关键工艺进行测试分析，对仰拱预制块与拱墙连接接头进行模型试验研究，并开展基底注浆试验和拼装试验研究；最后，结合工程实施，开展装配式仰拱结构受力测试。研究结果表明： 1）单线铁路隧道采用仰拱及填充一体开孔双立柱方案，吊装孔横向间距为4.6 m，纵向间距为0.9 m，起吊加速度控制在0.2 m/s²以内，可以满足起吊安全和实际施工需求； 2）在施工及仰拱拼装机等不同工况荷载作用下，仰拱预制块结构应力均在容许范围内，满足安全性要求； 3）装配式仰拱结构与拱墙现浇结构采用V形接头能较好地满足预制便捷性和安全性，仰拱预制块纵向拉紧力达到373 kN时可完全拉紧； 4）采用装配式仰拱结构，洞内综合施工效率可提高50%以上； 5）工程实际测试表明，采用装配式仰拱结构基底接触压力分布更加均匀，装配式仰拱和现浇拱墙结构作用下，装配式仰拱结构引起拱墙结构受力变化不大。

关键词: 铁路隧道, 装配式仰拱, 拼装, 施工工艺, 结构接头, 模型试验

Abstract: Green and intelligent construction practices are a current trend in railway tunnels. This study investigates the mechanical properties of prefabricated inverted arch structures during construction using the Yaopo tunnel of the Tianshui Longnan railway as a case study. First, five design modes for these structures are proposed. The modes are then subjected to force tests and theoretical calculations to evaluate the layout of hoisting holes. Next, the structural forces and longitudinal tension under different vehicle loads are tested, and model tests are performed on the connection joints between the prefabricated inverted arch blocks and the cast-in-place arch walls. In addition, tests on foundation grouting and assembly are conducted, and the forces acting on the prefabricated inverted arch structure are validated through practical engineering applications. The results reveal the following: (1) The integral opening double-column scheme for the inverted arch and filling of single-track railway tunnels meets the hoisting safety and construction requirements, with hoisting hole horizontal spacing of 4.6 m, longitudinal spacing of 0.9 m, and a controlled hoisting acceleration of 0.2 m/s². (2) The structural stress of the prefabricated inverted arch blocks remains within acceptable limits under varying construction and assembly machine loads to meet the safety requirements. (3) The V-shaped joint between the prefabricated inverted arch and the cast-in-place arch wall enhances prefabrication convenience and safety, enabling complete tightening of the prefabricated inverted arch blocks at a tension stress of 373 kN. (4) The use of prefabricated inverted arch structures improves overall construction efficiency within the tunnel by over 50%. (5) The contact pressure distribution beneath the inverted arch base is more uniform with prefabricated structures, and the force variation in the arch wall due to the prefabricated inverted arch structure is minimal.

Key words: railway tunnel, prefabricated inverted arch, assembly, construction technology, structural joint, model test

赵晓勇, 李国良, 王新东, 高新强, 熊伟, 郭显所. 铁路隧道装配式仰拱结构施工过程力学性能[J]. 隧道建设, 2026, 46(4): 828-839.

ZHAO Xiaoyong, LI Guoliang, WANG Xindong, GAO Xinqiang, XIONG Wei, GUO Xiansuo. Mechanical Properties of Prefabricated Inverted Arch Structures in Railway Tunnels During Construction[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2026, 46(4): 828-839.

[1]	黄明利, 谭世阳, 武暄, 李嘉诚. 大断面山岭隧道机械化施工“面支护”结构力学性能试验[J]. 隧道建设, 2026, 46(4): 665-681.
[2]	谢欣, 王建, 王恒栋, 康明睿, 高程鹏. 局部超载作用下2层双舱叠合式预制拼装管廊纵向力学性能[J]. 隧道建设, 2026, 46(4): 733-740.
[3]	田四明, 张艺腾, 李术才, 刘大刚, 黎旭. 铁路隧道高性能主动支护体系构建及智能设计 [J]. 隧道建设, 2026, 46(4): 790-803.
[4]	赵勇, 田四明, 巩江峰, 曹勇. Statistical Analysis of Railway Tunnels in China by the End of 2025 and Achievements in the 14th Five-Year Plan Period（截至2025年底中国铁路隧道情况统计分析及中国铁路隧道“十四五”建设成就）[J]. 隧道建设, 2026, 46(4): 877-892.
[5]	张发, 彭轲, 蔡直言, 郭成超. 基于模型试验的隧道刚柔复合衬砌承载特征[J]. 隧道建设, 2026, 46(2): 301-309.
[6]	仉文岗, 严玉苗, 吴志昊, 何齐海, 孙伟鑫, 张煌, 齐如见, 陈真. Application of Transparent Soil Materials in Geotechnical Tunnel Model Tests（透明土材料在隧道岩土工程模型试验中的应用综述）[J]. 隧道建设, 2026, 46(1): 1-34.
[7]	黄大维, 施良晨, 罗文俊, 闫江, 樊潇宇, 曾小涛. 囊袋注浆法抬升盾构隧道试验[J]. 隧道建设, 2026, 46(1): 80-89.
[8]	王帅帅, 仇文革, 史经峰, 徐勇, 孙向东, 王永仕, 陈昊喆, 段东亚. 高海拔隧道衬砌收缩约束开裂机理及防开裂优化措施[J]. 隧道建设, 2026, 46(1): 168-182.
[9]	冯冀蒙, 李艺飞, 姚仕钰, 王圣涛, 张俊儒, 孙宁. 洞桩法地铁车站先隧后站施工时序交互影响与变形控制[J]. 隧道建设, 2026, 46(1): 183-193.
[10]	宋效凯. 运营铁路隧道衬砌环向连续铣刨式凿毛台车研究与应用[J]. 隧道建设, 2026, 46(1): 204-213.
[11]	张文明, 张利峰, 王斐, 路海亮, 禹海涛, 李俊奇. 雄安新区地下综合管廊建设关键技术创新与应用[J]. 隧道建设, 2026, 46(1): 214-223.
[12]	刘斌, 纪磊, 李昌鹏, 罗彦斌, 葛强, 陈建勋, 李海. 含软弱夹层水平层状泥岩单线铁路隧道围岩稳定性分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2025, 45(S2): 150-162.
[13]	陈俊伟. 基于模型试验和数值分析的盾构隧道管片受力响应研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2025, 45(S1): 80-87.
[14]	黄书华. 复杂富水地层超大直径盾构隧道机械法联络通道施工关键技术与应用实践[J]. 隧道建设, 2025, 45(S1): 280-289.
[15]	柳献, 胡秋斌, 毛仁利, 庄欠伟. 基于机器视觉的管片自动拼装粗定位方法[J]. 隧道建设, 2025, 45(9): 1627-1639.

铁路隧道装配式仰拱结构施工过程力学性能

Mechanical Properties of Prefabricated Inverted Arch Structures in Railway Tunnels During Construction

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价