• CSCD核心中文核心科技核心
  • RCCSE(A+)公路运输高质量期刊T1
  • Ei CompendexScopusWJCI
  • EBSCOPж(AJ)JST
二维码

隧道建设(中英文) ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 960-969.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2026.05.005

• 研究与探索 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同轨底结构水下隧道及砂土地层的列车动力响应特性

于丽1, 肖阳1, 巩江峰2, 陈兰鑫1, 王乐明3, *, 张霄1   

  1. (1. 西南交通大学土木工程学院, 四川 成都 610031; 2. 中国铁路经济规划研究院有限公司,北京 100038; 3. 中国铁路设计集团有限公司, 天津 300308)
  • 出版日期:2026-05-20 发布日期:2026-05-20
  • 作者简介:于丽(1978—),女,辽宁大连人,2009年毕业于西南交通大学,桥梁与隧道工程专业,博士,教授,主要从事隧道及地下工程领域方面的研究工作。 E-mail: yui_1206@163.com。 *通信作者: 王乐明, E-mail: sdswangleming@126.com。

Dynamic Response of Underwater Tunnels and Sandy Strata With Different Under-Track Structures Under Train Load

YU Li1, XIAO Yang1, GONG Jiangfeng2, CHEN Lanxin1, WANG Leming3, ,  ZHANG Xiao1   

  1. (1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, China; 2. China Railway Economic and Planning Research Institute, Beijing 100038, China; 3. China Railway Design Corporation, Tianjin 300308, China)
  • Online:2026-05-20 Published:2026-05-20

摘要: 为研究大直径隧道轨底结构对列车作用下隧道-地层动力响应的影响规律,以崇太长江隧道为依托,采用模型试验及数值仿真手段,考虑不同轨底结构、车速、行驶条件对隧道-地层动力响应的影响。研究结果表明: 1)列车引起隧道及周边地层动力响应小,列车振动引起隧道结构拱底、拱顶、箱涵顶部加速度分别为0.065、0.400、0.910 m/s2;列车振动引起地层最大附加拉应力为2.600 kPa、最大附加压应力为7.540 kPa。2)2种轨底结构断面动力响应分布规律相似,不同轨底结构主要影响结构、地层动力响应量值,对动力响应分布规律影响较小。3)轨底结构对其底面以外的范围基本没有影响,在轨底结构边缘隧道动力响应最大相差0.013 m/s2,地层反力最大相差0.130 kPa。4)在隧道结构中,各测点动力响应随列车速度的增大而增大,测点越接近振源,敏感性越高;在地层中,拱腰以上测点动力响应随列车速度增大而减小,拱腰以下测点随列车速度增大而增大,基底敏感性最高,而拱腰敏感性最低。

关键词: 水下隧道, 轨底结构, 模型试验, 隧道-地层动力响应

Abstract:

This study investigates the influence of rail bottom structures (RBSs) on the train-induced dynamic responses of large-diameter shield tunnels and surrounding strata. The case study is conducted on the Chongtai Yangtze River Tunnel. Model testing and numerical simulations are performed to evaluate the effects of RBSs, train speeds, and operating conditions on tunnel-stratum dynamic behavior. The main findings are summarized as follows: (1) The train-induced dynamic responses by the tunnel and adjacent strata are relatively small. The measured accelerations at the arch bottom, crown, and box culvert top of the tunnel are 0.065, 0.400, and 0.910 m/s2, respectively. The maximum additional tensile and compressive stresses induced in the surrounding strata are 2.600 and 7.540 kPa, respectively. (2) The two RBSs exhibit similar cross-sectional distribution characteristics of dynamic responses. The RBS primarily affects the magnitudes, rather than the spatial distribution pattern, of the dynamic responses in the tunnel structure and surrounding strata. (3) The influence of the RBS is primarily confined to the region beneath its bottom surface, while its effect beyond this zone is negligible. At the edge of the RBS, the maximum differences in tunnel dynamic response and stratum reaction are 0.013 m/s2 and 0.130 kPa, respectively. (4) Within the tunnel structure, the dynamic responses at all measurement points increase with increasing train speed, with points closer to the vibration source exhibiting higher sensitivity. In the surrounding strata, the dynamic response decreases with increasing train speed at points above the arch waist, whereas it increases at points below the arch waist. Among the measurement points, the foundation base exhibits the highest sensitivity to train speed, while the arch waist shows the lowest sensitivity. 

Key words: underwater tunnel, rail bottom structure, model test, tunnel-stratum dynamic response