基于岩溶分布分析的突水风险评估模型研究

doi:10.3973/j.issn.1672-741X.2015.08.008

隧道建设（中英文） ›› 2015, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8): 792-801.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.1672-741X.2015.08.008

基于岩溶分布分析的突水风险评估模型研究

李集¹，常乐^2

（1.解放军理工大学国防工程学院，江苏南京 210007； 2.中国人民解放军94968部队，江苏南京 211100）

收稿日期:2015-04-02 修回日期:2015-05-12 出版日期:2015-08-20 发布日期:2015-08-24
作者简介:李集（1985-），男，海南陵水人，解放军理工大学国防工程学院在读硕士，主要研究方向为地下工程规划与管理。

Study on Karst Water Inrush Risk Assessment Model Based on Karst Distribution Analysis

LI Ji¹, CHANG Le²

(1. College of Defense Engineering, PLA University of Science & Technology, Nanjing 210007, Jiangsu, China;  2. PLA Unit 94968, Nanjing 211100, Jiangsu, China)

Received:2015-04-02 Revised:2015-05-12 Online:2015-08-20 Published:2015-08-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为实现岩溶突水风险评估的全过程动态修正与管理，一以岩溶发育分布规律为基础，采用半定量分析方法，估计溶洞与隧道在剖面图中的相对位置距离值，二将防突水岩层安全厚度的预测划分为初步估算、二次估计和动态测算3个阶段，每个阶段均采用有效的修正方式，不断获取更加准确且适用的防突岩层安全厚度预测数值。然后，综合考虑防突岩层安全厚度以及爆破开挖扰动深度影响，提出岩溶突水风险概率等级评价标准；通过划分突水量和溶腔高水头压强的等级，提出岩溶突水风险后果等级评价标准；并以二者为基础构建岩溶突水风险等级评估矩阵。最终，构建基于岩溶分布态势与防突岩层厚度的岩溶突水风险评估模型。通过具体工程实例检验，理论结果与实际情况相对比，验证所构建岩溶突水风险评估模型的合理性与可行性。

关键词: 岩溶隧道, 岩溶突水, 裂隙, 岩层安全厚度, 三阶段预测计算, 风险等级, 风险评估

Abstract:

The purpose of the paper is to realize the dynamic modification and management of the full course of the assessment on the karst water inrush risks. In the paper, first, the distance between the karst caves and the tunnel in the profile map is estimated by means of semiquantative analysis method on basis of the development and distribution rules of the karst; secondly, the prediction of the safe thickness of the karst water inrush resisting rock strata is divided into three stages, i.e., the preliminary estimation stage, the secondary estimation stage and the dynamic calculation stage, for which effective modification methods are adopted so as to obtain more accurate and more appropriate prediction values for the safe thickness of the karst water inrush resisting rock strata; thirdly, the evaluation standard for the probability level of the karst water inrush risks is proposed on basis of the safe thickness of the water inrush resisting rock strata and the disturbance depth of the excavation blasting, the evaluation standard for the consequence level of the karst water inrush risks is proposed by means of classifying the water inrush volumes and the water pressures in the karst chamber, and the assessment matrix for the grades of the karst water inrush risks is established; Finally, the assessment model for the karst water inrush risks based on the karst distribution pattern and the karst water inrush resisting rock strata is established. The comparison and contrast between the theoretical result and the actual conditions in the engineering cases verifies the rationality and feasibility of the karst water inrush risk assessment model. 

Key words: karst tunnel, karst water inrush, fissure, safe thickness of rock strata, threestage predictive calculation, risk level, risk assessment

中图分类号:

U 45

李集，常乐. 基于岩溶分布分析的突水风险评估模型研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2015, 35(8): 792-801.

LI Ji, CHANG Le. Study on Karst Water Inrush Risk Assessment Model Based on Karst Distribution Analysis[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2015, 35(8): 792-801.

[1]	王志杰，唐力，蒋新政，侯伟名，徐海岩，季晓峰. 大断面公路隧道临近溶洞开挖稳定性模型试验研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(S1): 16-24.
[2]	李志浩，熊自明，刘一鸣，卢浩. 基于纵向裂隙修正的岩体三维裂隙模拟及连通性分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(S1): 274-283.
[3]	邢修举. 岩溶隧道瞬变电磁三维超前探测技术研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(2): 287-293.
[4]	喻渝，李老三. 郑万高铁湖北段隧道风险评估与控制对策综述[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(1): 157-163.
[5]	林辉，吴文彪，王闯，封坤，谭荣珊，戴志成. 大埋深富水裂隙岩层土压平衡盾构填舱注浆施工技术[J]. 隧道建设, 2018, 38(S2): 268-277.
[6]	管泽英，杨朝帅. 超前预注浆技术在高压富水岩溶隧道中的优化应用[J]. 隧道建设, 2018, 38(S1): 136-141.
[7]	彭奇，刘国峰，杨腾，陈立. 强降雨条件下岩溶地质环境因素对隧道安全性的影响序列研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2018, 38(7): 1149-1157.
[8]	倪向阳，徐程，李伟平. 地铁隧道考虑流固耦合影响的微裂隙岩体注浆数值模拟研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2018, 38(10): 1667-1673.
[9]	秦成. 水文监测技术在岩溶隧道施工中的应用[J]. 隧道建设, 2017, 37(7): 878-884.
[10]	雷霆，关欣，洪帆，居炎飞，韩劲龙，李乐乐. 顶部溶洞水压对隧道突涌水灾害影响的数值分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2017, 37(2): 167-173.
[11]	廖斌, 黄厚旭, 戎晓力, 张志成. 饱水裂隙破坏模式及影响因素理论分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2016, 36(8): 933-940.
[12]	陈绍华. 青藏铁路西格二线关角隧道关键技术[J]. 隧道建设, 2016, 36(3): 355-372.
[13]	路平，郑刚, 张稳军，雷华阳. 天津地铁盾构施工对地表沉降影响的风险评估及精细化控制研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2016, 36(2): 170-178.
[14]	赵少龙，张乐文，许振浩，林鹏，何树江. 平行裂隙条件下水幕孔间距与压力对地下储油洞库水封性影响分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2016, 36(12): 1478-1486.
[15]	杨卓，马超. 基于BP神经网络方法的岩溶隧道突涌水风险预测[J]. 隧道建设, 2016, 36(11): 1337-1342.

基于岩溶分布分析的突水风险评估模型研究

Study on Karst Water Inrush Risk Assessment Model Based on Karst Distribution Analysis

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价