• 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
  • 中文核心期刊中文科技核心期刊
  • Scopus RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
  • 美国EBSCO数据库 俄罗斯《文摘杂志》
  • 《日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(中国)》
二维码

隧道建设(中英文) ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (10): 1772-1779.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2022.10.012

• 规划与设计 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同锚具锚固效果及最佳限位距离研究

彭传阳1, 陈强1, 方宗平2, 汪波3 *, 陈粟1   

  1. (1. 西南交通大学地球科学与环境工程学院, 四川 成都〓611756;2. 四川交达预应力工程检测科技有限公司, 四川 成都〓610000;3. 西南交通大学 交通隧道工程教育部重点实验室, 四川 成都〓610031)

  • 出版日期:2022-10-20 发布日期:2022-11-05

nchoring Effect and Optimal Limit Distance of Various Anchors

PENG Chuanyang1, CHEN Qiang1, FANG Zongping2, WANG Bo3, *, CHEN Su1   

  1. (1.Faculty of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu 611756,Sichuan,China;2.Sichuan Jiaoda Prestressed Engineering Testing Technology Co.,Ltd.,Chengdu 610000,Sichuan,China; 3.Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering,Ministry of Education,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu 610031,Sichuan,China)

  • Online:2022-10-20 Published:2022-11-05

摘要: 为解决公路隧道中采用预应力锚索支护时如何选择合适锚具及其最佳限位距离的问题,选用ABC 3类常见矿用锚具,通过理论分析、室内试验以及现场试验的方法,探究3类锚具锚固效果及与之对应的最佳限位距离。结果表明: 1)预应力损失与限位距离存在慢速下降、快速下降和稳定损失3个阶段,拐点x2为锚具的理论最佳限位距离; 2)根据锚具结构、相同限位距离下预应力损失情况和锚具张拉前后的回缩长度综合得出,在相同的条件下,B型锚具的锚固效果优于A型和C型; 3)锚具的实际最佳限位距离应低于理论最佳限位距离和锚索张拉前夹片平均外露长度,则对于最佳限位距离A型锚具为12.0 mmB型锚具为10.0 mmC型锚具为13.0 mm

关键词: 公路隧道, 锚具, 锚固效果, 限位距离, 预应力损失率

Abstract:  To rationally select the appropriate anchors and optimal limit distances when using prestressed anchor cable support in highway tunnels, three common mine anchoring tools, A, B, and C, are selected to explore the anchoring effect and the corresponding optimal limit distance of the anchoring tools through theoretical analysis and laboratory and field tests. The results reveal the following: (1) There are three stages of slow decline, rapid decline, and stable loss of prestress loss and limit distance. The inflection point 〖WTBXx2 WT5《TNR》〗is the theoretical optimal limit distance of anchors. (2) According to the anchorage structure, the prestress loss under the same limit distance, and the anchor retraction length before and after the tension, it is concluded that under the same conditions, the anchoring effect of type B anchorage outperforms that of types A and C. (3) The actual optimal limit distance of the anchor should be smaller than the theoretical optimal limit distance and the average exposed length of the clamp before the anchor cable tension. Thus, the optimal limit distances of types A, B, and C anchors are 12.0, 10.0, and 13.0 mm, respectively.