• CSCD核心中文核心科技核心
  • RCCSE(A+)公路运输高质量期刊T1
  • Ei CompendexScopusWJCI
  • EBSCOPж(AJ)JST
二维码

隧道建设(中英文) ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 935-945.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2026.05.003

• 研究与探索 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于隧道照明光环境的动态可视距离多影响因素耦合研究

冯守中1, 2, 3, 阚德远1, *, 谢承东3, 闫治国1, 宋远2   

  1. (1. 同济大学土木工程学院, 上海 200092; 2. 安徽理工大学土木建筑学院, 安徽 淮南 232001; 3. 安徽中益新材料科技有限公司, 安徽 滁州 239500)
  • 出版日期:2026-05-20 发布日期:2026-05-20
  • 作者简介:冯守中(1963—),男,安徽滁州人,2004年毕业于天津大学,土木工程专业,博士,教授,现从事公路隧道多维光环境照明研究工作。E-mail: 2300004@tongji.edu.cn。*通信作者: 阚德远, E-mail: kandeyuan152@163.com。

Coupling Analysis of Multiple Influencing Factors of Dynamic Visual Distance Based on Tunnel Luminous Environment

FENG Shouzhong1, 2, 3, KAN Deyuan1, *, XIE Chengdong3, YAN Zhiguo1, SONG Yuan2   

  1. (1. College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, Anhui, China; 3. Anhui Zhongyi New Material Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Chuzhou 239500, Anhui, China)
  • Online:2026-05-20 Published:2026-05-20

摘要: 为系统探究驾驶人在实际行车过程中动态可视距离受隧道光环境的影响,基于实车试验,突破传统静态或单因素分析的局限,重点考察车速、路面亮度、隧道侧壁特性及照明灯具等多因素之间的交互作用,及其对障碍物动态可视距离的影响规律。试验在可控照明条件下进行,设置不同照度等级(30~300 lx)及多种光环境组合,并选取4种不同车速工况,通过雷达激光测距技术获取驾驶人对目标的动态识别距离; 同时,结合材料反射率测试、照明均匀度测量及光谱分析,对隧道光环境特性进行系统表征。研究结果表明: 1)动态可视距离随车速提升显著降低,而现行规范要求的停车视距却随车速增加而增大,二者的反向变化关系使得在车速不低于80 km/h时,仅通过大幅提高照度难以抵消车速带来的负面影响,动态可视距离仍难以满足规范要求; 2)侧壁涂层及洞顶反光标识在低照度条件(30~60 lx)下可显著提升动态可视距离,但在高照度条件下其改善效果明显减弱,反映了照度与反光材料之间的交互特性; 3)通过补偿480~580 nm波段光谱,DFLED灯具因与人眼视觉感知效率的协同作用,在车速80 km/h、照度不低于60 lx条件下即可满足停车视距要求,而LED灯具在相同条件下即使进一步提高照度亦难以达标。

关键词: 公路隧道, 隧道照明, 动态可视距离, 行车安全, 实车试验

Abstract:

Conventional analyses of visual distance in highway tunnels, influenced by light environment, invariably consider static or single factors. To address these limitations, the interaction among multiple factors, including vehicle speed, pavement luminance, tunnel sidewall properties, and lighting luminaires, is emphatically examined based on field vehicle tests. The influence of these factors on dynamic visual distance of obstacles is also investigated. The experimental tests were conducted under controlled lighting conditions, with illuminance levels ranging from 30 to 300 lx and multiple luminous environment configurations. Four conditions involving varying vehicle speeds were selected for the study. The laser-radar ranging technology was adopted to obtain driver’s dynamic recognition distance of targets. Concurrently, the tunnel’s luminous environment characteristics were systematically characterized by material reflectance testing, lighting uniformity measurement, and spectral analysis. The results of the study indicate the following: (1) As vehicle speed increases, the dynamic visual distance decreases markedly, while the stopping sight distance required by current specifications increases concomitantly. The inverse variation relationship complicates the mitigation of the adverse effects of vehicle speed, as the enhancement of illuminance is only effective when the speed exceeds 80 km/h. Moreover, the dynamic visual distance falls short of the specified requirements. (2) The application of sidewall coatings and tunnel crown reflective markings significantly enhances the dynamic visual distance under low illuminance conditions of 30-60 lx. However, the efficacy of these markings diminishes under high illuminance conditions, illustrating the interaction between illuminance and reflective materials. (3) The DFLED luminaires exhibit a synergistic effect with human visual perception efficiency when compensating the spectral band of 480-580 nm. These luminaires meet the requisite stopping sight distance under conditions of 80 km/h vehicle speed and an illuminance of no less than 60 lx. By contrast, conventional LED luminaires fail to meet this standard even at higher illuminances under equivalent conditions.

Key words: highway tunnel, tunnel lighting, dynamic visual distance, driving safety, field vehicle test