盾构地中对接水泥改良粉质黏土地层冻结加固模型试验

doi:10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2026.06.005

隧道建设（中英文） ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6): 1186-1197.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2026.06.005

盾构地中对接水泥改良粉质黏土地层冻结加固模型试验

魏代伟¹，孙敬鑫^{1, *}，姚占虎²，石荣剑^{3, 4}，张雷¹，付硕任^{3, 4}，张亚洲¹

(1. 中交隧道工程局有限公司，江苏南京 211106； 2. 中交一公局集团有限公司，北京 100024； 3. 中国矿业大学深地工程智能建造与健康运维全国重点实验室，江苏徐州 221116； 4. 中国矿业大学力学与土木工程学院，江苏徐州 221116)

出版日期:2026-06-20 发布日期:2026-06-20
作者简介:魏代伟（1987—），男，山东日照人，2013年毕业于河海大学，岩土工程专业，硕士，高级工程师，主要从事地层冻结、大盾构施工等方面科研工作。E-mail: weidaiwei123@126.com。*通信作者：孙敬鑫， E-mail: sunjx777@126.com。

Freezing Reinforcement of Cement-Improved Silty Clay for Underground Shield Docking Evaluated Using a Scale Model

WEI Daiwei¹, SUN Jingxin^{1, *}, YAO Zhanhu², SHI Rongjian^{3, 4}, ZHANG Lei¹, FU Shuoren^{3, 4}, ZHANG Yazhou¹#br#

(1. CCCC Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd., Nanjing 211106, Jiangsu, China; 2. China First Highway Engineering Co., Ltd., Beijing 100024, China; 3. China State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Construction and Healthy Operation and Maintenance of Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China; 4. School of Mechanics & Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China)

Online:2026-06-20 Published:2026-06-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探明盾构地中对接过程中水泥改良粉质黏土地层的温度场演化特征及其冻胀抑制机制，以江阴靖江长江隧道盾构水下对接工程为原型，基于相似准则开展大型3向加载物理模型试验，系统对比分析原状粉质黏土与质量掺量为10%的水泥改良粉质黏土在非对称冻结形式下的温度场演变规律、冻结壁发展过程及冻胀力时空分布特征，并对冻胀抑制效果进行定量评价。试验结果表明： 1）水泥改良后地层降温速率降低，冻结壁交圈时间较原状土延长约22.7%，但交圈后冻结锋面发展速率加快；冻结90 d后，2类土层冻结壁厚度差异显著缩小。2）冻结过程中，冻胀力呈阶段性演化特征，原状土在冻结壁交圈前后冻胀力增长显著，而水泥改良土冻胀力发展存在明显滞后性，冻胀力峰值出现时间延后。3）最大冻胀荷载集中于盾构对接截面腰线位置，原状土最大冻胀力可达地层初始压力的2倍以上，经质量掺量为10%的水泥改良后，同位置最大冻胀力降至1.48倍，整体冻胀力平均降低约40%，对接中心区域抑制效果最为显著，最大降幅达52%。4）水泥改良通过改变土体的热物理性质及水分迁移特征，进而影响冻结过程中温度场与冻胀力发展规律，工程中可通过合理设计水泥改良措施及掺量调节冻结壁形成过程及冻胀演化特征。

关键词: 盾构对接, 冻结加固, 水泥改良地层, 模型试验, 冻胀效应

Abstract: To investigate the temperature-field evolution and frost-heave suppression mechanism of cement-improved silty clay during underground shield docking, a case study is conducted on the underwater shield docking project of the Jiangyin-Jingjiang Yangtze River Tunnel. A large-scale three-dimensional loading physical model is constructed based on similarity criteria, and a comparative analysis is conducted on the temperature-field evolution, frozen-wall development, and spatiotemporal distribution of frost heave force between undisturbed silty clay and silty clay improved with 10% cement under asymmetric freezing conditions. Furthermore, the frost-heave suppression effect is quantitatively evaluated. The results show that the cement-improved ground has a lower cooling rate and a ~22.7% longer frozen-wall closure time than undisturbed soil. However, the development rate of the freezing front accelerates after closure, resulting in a significant reduction in the thickness difference between the frozen walls of the two soils after 90 days. Furthermore, the frost heave force exhibits a staged evolution during freezing: it increases significantly in the undisturbed soil before and after frozen-wall closure, whereas a noticeable lag is observed in the cement-improved soil, with a delayed peak occurrence. The maximum frost heave load is concentrated at the springline of the docking section. Specifically, the peak frost heave force in the undisturbed soil is more than double the initial ground pressure, whereas it decreases to 1.48 times the initial ground pressure after cement improvement. This corresponds to an average reduction of ~40% in the overall frost heave force, with a maximum suppression rate of 52% achieved in the central docking area. The cement improvement alters the thermophysical properties and moisture migration characteristics of the soil, influencing the evolution of the temperature field and frost heave force during freezing. Consequently, the frozen-wall formation process and frost heave response can be effectively regulated by appropriately designing cement improvement measures and dosages.

Key words: shield docking, freezing reinforcement, cement-improved ground, model test, frost heave effect

魏代伟, 孙敬鑫, 姚占虎, 石荣剑, 张雷, 付硕任, 张亚洲. 盾构地中对接水泥改良粉质黏土地层冻结加固模型试验[J]. 隧道建设, 2026, 46(6): 1186-1197.

WEI Daiwei, SUN Jingxin, YAO Zhanhu, SHI Rongjian, ZHANG Lei, FU Shuoren, ZHANG Yazhou. Freezing Reinforcement of Cement-Improved Silty Clay for Underground Shield Docking Evaluated Using a Scale Model[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2026, 46(6): 1186-1197.

/ 推荐

[1]	姚占虎, 杨南, 张亚洲, 梁玉强, 李辉, 陆平, 孙敬鑫. 高水压强渗透地层盾构地中对接足尺模型试验（Ⅰ）—— 平台设计[J]. 隧道建设, 2026, 46(6): 1145-1158.
[2]	魏代伟, 姚占虎, 孙敬鑫, 张雷, 石荣剑, 李辉. 盾构地中对接非对称冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 隧道建设, 2026, 46(6): 1198-1207.
[3]	张亚洲, 杨南, 姚占虎, 张雷, 任艳武, 燕晓, 魏代伟. 高水压强渗透地层盾构地中对接足尺模型试验（Ⅱ）—— 试验方法及应用验证[J]. 隧道建设, 2026, 46(6): 1231-1243.
[4]	苏昂, 孙敬鑫, 姚占虎, 王峻, 魏代伟, 周欣, 付硕任. 盾构水下对接冻结加固抑制冻胀效应模型试验[J]. 隧道建设, 2026, 46(6): 1265-1278.
[5]	于丽, 肖阳, 巩江峰, 陈兰鑫, 王乐明, 张霄. 不同轨底结构水下隧道及砂土地层的列车动力响应特性[J]. 隧道建设, 2026, 46(5): 960-969.
[6]	黄明利, 谭世阳, 武暄, 李嘉诚. 大断面山岭隧道机械化施工“面支护”结构力学性能试验[J]. 隧道建设, 2026, 46(4): 665-681.
[7]	赵晓勇, 李国良, 王新东, 高新强, 熊伟, 郭显所. 铁路隧道装配式仰拱结构施工过程力学性能[J]. 隧道建设, 2026, 46(4): 828-839.
[8]	张发, 彭轲, 蔡直言, 郭成超. 基于模型试验的隧道刚柔复合衬砌承载特征[J]. 隧道建设, 2026, 46(2): 301-309.
[9]	仉文岗, 严玉苗, 吴志昊, 何齐海, 孙伟鑫, 张煌, 齐如见, 陈真. Application of Transparent Soil Materials in Geotechnical Tunnel Model Tests（透明土材料在隧道岩土工程模型试验中的应用综述）[J]. 隧道建设, 2026, 46(1): 1-34.
[10]	黄大维, 施良晨, 罗文俊, 闫江, 樊潇宇, 曾小涛. 囊袋注浆法抬升盾构隧道试验[J]. 隧道建设, 2026, 46(1): 80-89.
[11]	冯冀蒙, 李艺飞, 姚仕钰, 王圣涛, 张俊儒, 孙宁. 洞桩法地铁车站先隧后站施工时序交互影响与变形控制[J]. 隧道建设, 2026, 46(1): 183-193.
[12]	陈俊伟. 基于模型试验和数值分析的盾构隧道管片受力响应研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2025, 45(S1): 80-87.
[13]	张朝, 高柯, 许有俊, 聂绪致, 王乐, 李鑫. 基床弱化条件下预制综合管廊接头破坏特征及抗剪刚度研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2025, 45(3): 539-548.
[14]	李大伟, 钟小春, 刘昶, 沈桂丽, 钟建玲, 黄思远. 盾尾刷多腔密封系统渗漏数值模型及验证[J]. 隧道建设, 2025, 45(2): 304-314.
[15]	赵洪波, 刘国庆, 张长亮, 钟辉虹, 宋神友, 范子武, 彭英俊, 金文良. 钢壳混凝土交界面脱空中子散射法识别技术应用[J]. 隧道建设, 2025, 45(12): 2266-2274.

盾构地中对接水泥改良粉质黏土地层冻结加固模型试验

Freezing Reinforcement of Cement-Improved Silty Clay for Underground Shield Docking Evaluated Using a Scale Model

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价