ISSN 2096-4498

   CN 44-1745/U

二维码

Tunnel Construction ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7): 1106-1114.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2021.07.004

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Discussion on Route Schemes of a Seabed Vacuum Tube Transport in Taiwan Strait

ZHANG Yaoping   

  1. (Institute of Vacuum Tube Transport, Xijing University, Xi′an 710123, Shaanxi, China)
  • Online:2021-07-20 Published:2021-07-29

Abstract: Vacuum tube transport has advantages such as small crosssection size, lightweight, and integrated structure. When it is constructed on a seabed as a seacrossing channel, its cost is lower than a seacrossing bridge, submarine, immerged, or submerged floating tunnel. Therefore, it is one of the alternatives for Taiwan Strait passage. Herein, the route direction, longitudinal crosssection, structure form of intosea point, and landing point of the seabed vacuum tube in the Taiwan Strait are analyzed. Subsequently, according to the principle of the shortest distance, the development of cities on the both sides of the Taiwan Strait, existing traffic status and future development plan, distribution of islands, topography, and landform of the seafloor, and based on the structural characteristics of vacuum tube and elevation data of Google Earth, the isobath map is drawn, and the line plane and vertical section maps under different conditions are given and compared. The rational route is located in the range of the PingtanHsinchu channel, including the PingtanTaoyuan Xinwu and PingtanHsinchu North districts. The route of the seacrossing section is approximately 128 km in length, and the largest depth and longitudinal slope reaches 87 m and 10, respectively. The intosea section should adopt the maximum slope limit to reduce the length lashed by seawaves, or the tunnel scheme should be adopted between the land and vacuum tube.

Key words: Taiwan Strait, seabed vacuum tube, route scheme, submarine topography, isobath, intosea point

CLC Number: