ISSN 2096-4498

   CN 44-1745/U

二维码

Tunnel Construction ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5): 1096-1105.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2024.05.017

Previous Articles     Next Articles

FiveStep Single SideDrift Method for Fenghuangshan SuperLarge CrossSection Loess Tunnel

QIAO Minglei1, LI Sheng1 *, ZHANG Jiangong2, WANG Qicai1, 3, XUE Yanjin1, 3, CHEN Zhigang1   

  1. (1. College of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China;  2. China Seventeen Metallurgical Group Co., Ltd., Ma′anshan 243000, Anhui, China; 3. Lanzhou Jiaotong University Road and Bridge Engineering Disaster Prevention Technology National Local Joint Engineering Laboratory, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China)

  • Online:2024-05-20 Published:2024-06-22

Abstract:

 The double sidedrift method used in superlarge crosssection loess tunnels is slow in tunneling advance and costly. To address these challenges, a case study is conducted on the expansion and reconstruction project of the Fenghuangshan tunnel from Qingshuiyi to Zhonghe section of the G30 LianyungangKhorgos expressway, and a fivestep single sidedrift method is proposed. The surrounding rocks deformation and streel archs stress when employing the double sidedrift, fivestep single sidedrift, conventional single sidedrift, and bench methods are comparatively analyzed. Finally, the feasibility of the fivestep single sidedrift method for constructing the Fenghuangshan tunnel is validated through field monitoring data. The results reveal the following: (1) The crown settlement and horizontal convergence of the fivestep single sidedrift method are 3.59 cm and 1.31 cm lower than those of the conventional single sidedrift method and 1.4 cm and 0.59 cm higher than those of the double sidedrift method. The stress of the steel arch is less than that of the double sidedrift method except for the arch shoulder, with a maximum reduction of 70 MPa. The ratio of the maximum stress of the steel arch to the steel yield strength is 0.04 higher than that of the double sidedrift method and 0.08 lower than that of the single sidedrift method. (2) The traditional single sidedrift method is less safe than the fivestep single sidedrift method. The improved fivestep single sidedrift heading method, compared with the double sidedrift method, can accelerate construction progress and reduce construction costs while controlling surrounding rock deformation. (3) The optimal position of the partition wall in the fivestep single sidedrift method is 0.45 times the hole width in the Fenghuangshan tunnel and should be adjusted based on actual conditions for further application.

Key words: superlarge crosssection loess tunnel, fivestep single sidedrift method, numerical simulation, field monitoring