Research on Complexity Evaluation for Geological Conditions of Foundation Pit Based on Cloud Model

doi:10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2018.10.011

Tunnel Construction ›› 2018, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (10): 1674-1679.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2018.10.011

Previous Articles Next Articles

Research on Complexity Evaluation for Geological Conditions of Foundation Pit Based on Cloud Model

LI Ming^{1, 2}， WU Bo^{1, 3}， LI Chunfang⁴

(1. School of Civil Engineering, Fujian University of Technology, Fuzhou 350118, Fujian, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Underground Engineering， Fuzhou 350118， Fujian， China; 3. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, Guangxi, China;  4. CCCC First Highway Xiamen Engineering Co., Ltd., Xiamen 361021, Fujian, China)

Received:2018-01-19 Revised:2018-04-07 Online:2018-10-20 Published:2018-10-26

Abstract

Abstract:

The complexity evaluation for geological conditions of foundation pit is characterized by fuzzy and random. Hence, a method for determining the cloud model of complexity evaluation of geological conditions of foundation pit with quantitative index as interval number is established based on fuzziness and randomness of cloud model. The geological characteristics of Fujian area and possible risks during foundation pit construction are analyzed and summarized. The complexity evaluation system for geological conditions of foundation pit and quantitative standard of each index are established. The evaluation grades are divided into 4 kinds, i.e. simple, general, relatively complicated and complicated, which respectively correspond to intervals of ［0,2.5), ［2.5,5.0), ［5.0,7.5) and ［7.5,10.0］, and the numerical characteristics of corresponding cloud model is determined. The abovementioned theory and method are applied to a foundation pit of Fuzhou Metro Line No. 2, the treatment measures for groundwater and soft soil are put forward based on evaluation results, and the feasibility and effectiveness of abovementioned method are verified by engineering practice.

Key words: foundation pit engineering, geological condition, complexity evaluation, cloud model, analytic hierarchy process

CLC Number:

U 45

LI Ming， WU Bo， LI Chunfang. Research on Complexity Evaluation for Geological Conditions of Foundation Pit Based on Cloud Model[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2018, 38(10): 1674-1679.

[1]	FANG Youliang, LU Zhiren, WANG Jin, FU Qiao, ZI Xiaoyu, LIAN Zheng. Safety Support Technology for Ultra-deep Foundation Pit Based on Support Servo Combined System [J]. Tunnel Construction, 2019, 39(S2): 120-128.
[2]	ZHANG Miaolin, ZHANG Chengzhong. Model Building for Investment and Operation Mode Selection of Utility Tunnel [J]. Tunnel Construction, 2019, 39(8): 1319-1325.
[3]	YANG Huijun, KONG Heng. Basic Principles of a Design and Construction Method for Open Excavation Technology under Complex Conditions [J]. Tunnel Construction, 2019, 39(7): 1147-1151.
[4]	YE Fei， XU Changxin, WEI Yanchun, YING Kaichen, WANG Siyu. Aesthetic Analysis of Mountain Highway Tunnel Entrance [J]. Tunnel Construction, 2019, 39(4): 563-570.
[5]	TANG Yangyi, WU Xianguo, CHEN Hongyu, TAO Yanyan, WANG Hu, ZENG Tiemei, ZHANG Limao . Evaluation of Floating Risk of Shield Tunnel Segments Based on Cloud Model and D-S Evidence Theory [J]. Tunnel Construction, 2019, 39(12): 2011-.
[6]	WANG Jianbo, YOU Weibao, LIU Fangmeng, YANG Diying, ZHANG Wei. Study of Green Construction Evaluation of Urban Deep Foundation Pit Based on Improved Vague Similarity Summary Method [J]. Tunnel Construction, 2018, 38(S1): 7-14.
[7]	WANG Han, HE Weiguo, YUAN Yong. Lifecycle Risk Evaluation for Qiongzhou Strait Railway Tunnel [J]. Tunnel Construction, 2018, 38(9): 1513-1519.
[8]	ZHU Jihong, ZHANG Wenxin, ZHANG Lianghui. Study of Construction Technology for Diaphragm Wall under Complex Geological Conditions in Sea Cofferdam [J]. Tunnel Construction, 2018, 38(9): 1554-1559.
[9]	YANG Jihua, ZHU Shaobin, YAN Changbin, MIAO Dong, GUO Weixin. Study of Geological Influencing Factors on TBM Tunneling Efficiency Based on Extenics Theory [J]. Tunnel Construction, 2018, 38(5): 782-789.
[10]	QI Mengxue, ZHOU Yanling. Study and Application of Sustained, Proportional and Speedy (SPS) Construction Method for TBM Tunnel [J]. Tunnel Construction, 2018, 38(11): 1860-1867.
[11]	SONG Faliang, ZHAO Hailei. Study of Key Construction Technologies of Open TBM in Complex Geological Conditions: Case Study of Gaoligongshan Tunnel [J]. Tunnel Construction, 2017, 37(S1): 128-133.
[12]	LIN Naishan, CHEN Bin, YAO Yanming, ZHANG Chunjin. Practice and Suggestion on QuasiRectangular Shield Tunnel Engineering of Entrance/Exit Section on Ningbo Rail Transit Line No. 3 [J]. Tunnel Construction, 2017, 37(6): 722-729.
[13]	QIAN Qihu. Main Developments and Directions of Geological Prediction and Informatized Technology of Tunnel Construction [J]. Tunnel Construction, 2017, 37(3): 251-263.
[14]	CAI Bao， SHI Kunju， ZHU Wenhua. Study of Cutting Simulation of Shield Cutter Group Based on ABAQUS [J]. Tunnel Construction, 2017, 37(10): 1334-1340.
[15]	YUAN Zhu, CHEN Yong， WANG Zhu. Study on Influence Zoning of Singletrack Railway Tunnel Underpassing Expressway Tunnel at Mountainous Areas [J]. Tunnel Construction, 2016, 36(2): 164-169.

Research on Complexity Evaluation for Geological Conditions of Foundation Pit Based on Cloud Model

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments