ISSN 2096-4498

   CN 44-1745/U

二维码

Tunnel Construction ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (10): 2005-2015.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2024.10.009

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Resilience Assessment Method for Construction Safety of Urban Underground Engineering Close to Operating Metro

HAN Kaihang1, 2, 3, LI Yansong1, 2, 3, CHEN Xiangsheng1, 2, 3, *, BAO Xiaohua1, 2, 3, WANG Shuying1, 2, 3ZHANG Chengping4, WEI Gang5, ZHANG Zhiguo6, ZHAO Qian1, 2, 3   

  1. (1. State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Geotechnics and Tunnelling, Shenzhen 518060, Guangdong, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Coastal Urban Resilient Infrastructures (MOE), Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, Guangdong, China; 3. College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, Guangdong, China; 4. Key Laboratory of Urban Underground Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China; 5. Department of Civil Engineering, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou 310015, Zhejiang, China; 6. School of Environment and Architecture, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China)
  • Online:2024-10-20 Published:2024-11-12

Abstract: A resilience assessment approach is proposed for the construction safety of urban underground engineering adjacent to an operating metro. First, three key factors involved in close construction (existing underground structure, formation, and newly-built underground engineering) and two dimensions (technology and management) are analyzed, establishing a relatively complete resilience index system. Second, a weight combination analysis approach for the resilience index system is developed using the analytic hierarchy process, entropy weight approach, and game theory. Furthermore, a method for the continuous evaluation of the complex performance Q of the system is proposed based on the theory of set pair analysis. Finally, an evaluation formula for resilience is proposed from the aspects of maximum damage and cumulative damage, which is then applied to the analysis of a case study. The main findings include: (1) The newly proposed resilience assessment method can be mutually verified with traditional risk assessment method, and the new method considers more comprehensive factors. (2) The composite performance Qof the proposed system contains three dimensions, namely, existing underground structure (QA), formation (QB), and newly-built underground engineering (QC), showing more comprehensiveness than the conventional assessment theory. (3) As the limits of dynamic indices of existing underground structures become increasingly stringent, the evaluation results of the system's composite performance correspond to a decrease.

Key words: urban underground engineering, close construction, resilience assessment, set pair analysis, case study