盾构直接切削ϕ25 mm主筋钢筋混凝土桩基可行性研究

doi:10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2020.12.016

中国科学引文数据库（CSCD）来源期刊
中文核心期刊中文科技核心期刊
Scopus RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
美国EBSCO数据库俄罗斯《文摘杂志》
《日本科学技术振兴机构数据库（中国）》

隧道建设（中英文） ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (12): 1808-1816.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2020.12.016

盾构直接切削ϕ25 mm主筋钢筋混凝土桩基可行性研究

李宏波^{1, 2}

（1. 盾构及掘进技术国家重点实验室，河南郑州 450001； 2. 中铁隧道局集团有限公司，广东广州 511458）

出版日期:2020-12-20 发布日期:2021-01-03
作者简介:李宏波(1986—), 男, 河南信阳人, 2012年毕业于北京科技大学, 机械工程专业, 硕士, 高级工程师, 主要从事盾构TBM技术研发相关工作。E-mail: lylihongbo@163.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（51805042，51478146）；国家863计划项目（2012AA041802）; 中国中铁股份有限公司科技开发计划（2019-重点-20）

Feasibility Study on Direct Cutting of Reinforced Concrete Pile Foundation with ϕ25 mm Main Reinforced Bar by Shield

LI Hongbo^1,2

(1. State Key Laboratory of Shield Machine and Boring Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, China; 2. China Railway Tunnel Group Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 511458, Guangdong, China)

Online:2020-12-20 Published:2021-01-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探索盾构直接切削ϕ25 mm主筋的钢筋混凝土桩基可行性,解决盾构切削桩基出现的刀盘卡死、刀具损坏及效率低等难题，依托TBM模态掘进试验平台模拟开展滚刀和撕裂刀切削桩基试验，通过对钢筋断裂形态、受力特性、切削参数、刀具损坏及刀盘振动特性综合分析，主要结论如下： 1）滚刀切削钢筋主要破坏形式为碾压破坏，钢筋有效断筋占比为90.6%，撕裂刀切削钢筋主要破坏形式为剪切破坏，钢筋有效断筋占比为85.4%； 2）全盘撕裂刀和全盘滚刀切削钢筋相比，撕裂刀切削参数波动较大，切削过程不平稳，振动冲击较大，且因承受较大侧向冲击力，撕裂刀合金崩裂崩脱损坏形式较多； 3）滚刀切削钢筋耐冲击效果优于撕裂刀，撕裂刀切削钢筋正向切割效果优于滚刀，可采用组合刀具布置充分发挥各自切削优势； 4）钢筋切削推进速度不宜过快，切削过程需重点关注转矩波动，建议撕裂刀切削桩基推进速度不大于3 mm/min，滚刀切削桩基推进速度不大于5 mm/min。试验成果成功应用于深圳地铁切桩工程，试验与实践共同表明盾构直接切削ϕ25 mm主筋的大直径钢筋混凝土桩基是可行的。

关键词: 盾构, 切削桩基, 滚刀, 撕裂刀, 受力特性, 切削参数, 断裂形态

Abstract:

When shield cuts the pile foundation directly, the cutterhead is jammed and the cutters are damaged often. As a result, it is urgent to explore the feasibility of directly cutting of reinforced concrete pile foundation with ϕ25 mm main reinforced bar by shield to improve the construction efficiency. The test on pile foundation cut by disc cutter and tearing cutter is carried out on TBM modal tunneling test platform, and the fracture morphology of reinforced bar, force characteristics, cutting parameters, cutter damage and cutterhead vibration characteristics are comprehensively analyzed. The analytical results show that: (1) The main failure mode of reinforced bar cut by disc cutter is rolling failure, and the effective reinforced bar breaking ratio is 90.6%; and that by tearing cutter is shear failure, and the effective reinforced bar breaking ratio is 85.4%. (2) Compared with full disc cutter, cutting parameters of the full tearing cutter fluctuate greatly, the cutting process is unstable, and the vibration impact is large; moreover, due to the large lateral impact force, the collapse form of tearing cutter alloy varies. (3) The impact resistance effect of the disc cutter is better than that of tearing cutter, and the forward cutting effect of the tearing cutter is better than that of the disc cutter, which indicates that the combination of disc cutter and tearing cutter can be adopted. (4) The advancing speed of reinforced bar cutting should not be too fast (less than 3 mm/min for tearing cutter and less than 5 mm/min for disc cutter), and the torque fluctuation should be paid more attention to during the cutting process. The test results have been successfully applied to Shenzhen Metro pile cutting project, and the test and practice results show that it is feasible to directly cut the large diameter reinforced concrete pile foundation with ϕ25 mm main reinforced bar.

Key words: shield, pile foundation cutting, disc cutter, tearing cutter, mechanical characteristics, cutting parameters, fracture morphology

中图分类号:

U 45

李宏波. 盾构直接切削ϕ25 mm主筋钢筋混凝土桩基可行性研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(12): 1808-1816.

LI Hongbo.

Feasibility Study on Direct Cutting of Reinforced Concrete Pile Foundation with ϕ25 mm Main Reinforced Bar by Shield [J]. Tunnel Construction, 2020, 40(12): 1808-1816.

[1]	陈亚南, 陈良武, 赵磊, 马琳. 盾构主驱动密封失效检测及原因分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(S1): 419-422.
[2]	杜宝义, 宋超业, 贺维国. 海底隧道盾构异常磨损开舱辅助工法应用分析——以厦门地铁过海区间隧道工程为例 [J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(S1): 374-381.
[3]	韩伟锋, 孙振川, 王雅文, 郑永光. 隧道掘进破岩试验机结构设计及仿真[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(S1): 413-418.
[4]	寇鼎涛, 孙健. 6 680 mm盾构在狭小暗挖隧道内解体技术研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(S1): 404-412.
[5]	李安云, 孙钰斌, 胡增绪, 张雷. 超大直径盾构负环精细化拼装工艺研究——以南京和燕路过江通道工程为例 [J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(S1): 350-357.
[6]	李海洋. 四线叠交小间距盾构隧道下穿桥梁沉降控制案例分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(S1): 343-349.
[7]	梁斯铭, 谢长岭, 蒋儿, 宋锐, 贾立翔, 张文轩. 分布式光纤技术在隧道变形监测中的应用[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(S1): 436-443.
[8]	刘凤洲, 谢雄耀, 王强, 周彪. 盾构施工沉降多源数据实时交互平台开发[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(S1): 82-89.
[9]	刘健美. 广州南沙深厚软基段盾构隧道长期沉降计算[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(S1): 138-144.
[10]	卢为杰. 地铁工程盾构接收渗漏险情的处理实践[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(S1): 364-368.
[11]	路开道. 水下圆砾地层盾构隧道施工期力学响应实测研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(S1): 152-159.
[12]	宋杰. 富水砂卵石地层盾构隧道长距离穿越机场飞行区技术研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(S1): 288-296.
[13]	吴忠仕, 贺祖浩, 刘文, 许超, 孔茜. 大直径泥水盾构始发钢套筒的防扭施工技术——以孟加拉卡纳普里河水下隧道为例[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(S1): 321-326.
[14]	徐敬贺. 南宁地铁5号线“泥水+土压”双模式盾构掘进模式快速转换关键技术 [J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(S1): 389-395.
[15]	姚印彬. 浅覆土强透水砂卵石地层大直径泥水盾构干接收施工技术[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(S1): 396-403.

盾构直接切削ϕ25 mm主筋钢筋混凝土桩基可行性研究

Feasibility Study on Direct Cutting of Reinforced Concrete Pile Foundation with ϕ25 mm Main Reinforced Bar by Shield

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价