• 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
  • 中文核心期刊中文科技核心期刊
  • Scopus RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
  • 美国EBSCO数据库 俄罗斯《文摘杂志》
  • 《日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(中国)》
二维码

隧道建设(中英文) ›› 2019, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (S2): 176-184.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2019.S2.023

• 研究与探索 • 上一篇    下一篇

软弱地层的大断面双连拱隧道设计与施工方案优化研究

杨学奇1, 2, 王明年1, 2, 陈树汪3, 刘大刚1, 2, ∗   

  1. (1. 西南交通大学土木工程学院, 四川 成都 610031; 2. 西南交通大学 交通隧道工程教育部重点实验室, 四川 成都 610031; 3. 云南省交通规划设计研究院有限公司, 云南 昆明 650011)
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-22 出版日期:2019-12-31 发布日期:2020-04-04
  • 作者简介:杨学奇(1991—), 男, 云南大理人, 西南交通大学隧道与地下工程专业在读硕士, 研究方向为隧道与地下工程结构设计方法与施工 力学。E-mail: yangxq12go@ 163. com。?通信作者: 刘大刚, E-mail: ldg980272@ 163. com。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(51878567, 51578458, 51878568)

Optimization of Design and Construction Scheme for Large Cross-section Double-arch Tunnel in Soft Ground

YANG Xueqi1, 2, WANG Mingnian1, 2, CHEN Shuwang3, LIU Dagang1, 2, ∗   

  1. (1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering, Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, China; 3. Broadvision Engineering Consultants Co., Ltd., Kunming 650011, Yunnan, China)
  • Received:2019-01-22 Online:2019-12-31 Published:2020-04-04

摘要:

为研究一种新的连拱隧道施工方法———无中墙单洞法在软弱围岩地层中的可行性和适用性,依托平文高速土基冲连拱隧道工程,采用数值模拟方法在施工力学性能方面对无中墙单洞法和传统的三导洞法进行比选分析,并通过现场监控量测结果验证工法的可行性和安全性。研究结果表明: 1)在支护结构受力性能方面,由于无中墙单洞法临时支护结构较少,结构处理圆顺,能更有效地减少应力集中现象; 2)在结构设计方面,由于无中墙单洞法取消了中隔墙结构,使得施工难度降低; 3)在施工工法方面,采用三台阶法分别对先行、后行隧道进行单洞施工,增加了作业空间,提高了施工组织效率; 4)综合考虑施工力学与工期进度的影响可知,无中墙单洞法适用性较好,可为类似地层条件下双连拱隧道的设计和施工提供参考。

关键词: 软弱地层, 连拱隧道, 三导洞法, 无中墙单洞法, 现场监测

Abstract:

In order to study the feasibility and applicability of a new tunneling method in soft surrounding rock,i. e. the single-hole method without mid-wall,the comparative analysis is made on construction mechanical properties of the single-tunnel method without mid-wall and the traditional three-pilot drift method by means of numerical simulation based on the Pingyuan-WenshanHigh-speed Tujichong double-arch tunnel. Meanwhile, the feasibility and safety of the construction method are verified by the statistical analysis of the field monitoring results. The results show that: (1) In terms of deformation control, the two method meet the requirements of safe construction both, but the three-pilot drift method is slightly superior to the single-tunnel method without mid-wall. (2)In terms of the bearing performance of the supporting structure, the stress concentration phenomenon can be effectively reduced by the single-tunnel method without mid-wall for its less temporary support structure adopted and smooth structure. (3) In terms of the structural design, the construction difficulty of the single-tunnel method without mid-wall is small than that of three-pilot drift method due to mid-wall cancel. (4) In terms of the construction method, the construction space is enlarged and the construction organization efficiency is improved by adopting three-bench method to construct two single tunnels. (5) Considering the influence of construction mechanics and construction schedule, the the single-tunnel method without mid-wall has a good applicability which can provide reference for the design and construction of double-arch tunnels under similar stratum conditions in the future.

Key words: soft ground, multi-arch tunnel, three-pilot drift method, single-tunnel method without mid-wall, field monitoring

中图分类号: