复合式连拱隧道曲中墙施工力学行为时空演化规律

doi:10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2022.06.010

隧道建设（中英文） ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6): 1022-1032.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2022.06.010

复合式连拱隧道曲中墙施工力学行为时空演化规律

徐晴¹，张素磊^{1,
2， *}，刘昌³，张国栋¹，陈德刚²

(1. 青岛理工大学土木工程学院，山东青岛 266033； 2. 青建集团股份公司，山东青岛 266071；3. 北京交通大学城市与地下工程教育部重点实验室，北京 100044)

出版日期:2022-06-20 发布日期:2022-07-05
作者简介:徐晴(1996—)，男，山东枣庄人，青岛理工大学土木工程专业在读硕士，研究方向为隧道与地下工程。Email: 1207099434@qq.com。 *通信作者：张素磊, Email: zhangsulei@126.com。

Spatial and Temporal Evolution Characteristics of Mechanical Behavior of Curved Middle Wall of Composite DoubleArch Tunnel

XU Qing¹， ZHANG Sulei^{1, 2， *}， LIU Chang³， ZHANG Guodong¹， CHEN Degang²

(1. School of Civil Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266033, Shandong, China;
2. Qingjian Group Co., Ltd., Qingdao 266071, Shandong, China; 3. Key Laboratory for Urban Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

Online:2022-06-20 Published:2022-07-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为解决连拱隧道开挖过程中曲中墙安全承载问题，依托浙江省某在建复合式曲中墙连拱隧道，采用数值计算及现场监测手段对施工阶段曲中墙力学演化规律及偏压机制进行分析，并从设计、施工层面分别就曲中墙厚度及主洞施工步距对曲中墙应力及偏压影响规律进行研究。研究结果表明： 1）连拱隧道主洞上台阶开挖对曲中墙应力分布影响显著，此阶段应力增量约占应力终值的50%，曲中墙以承受竖向应力为主，横断面最小截面为受力最不利位置。2）连拱隧道非对称开挖造成曲中墙承受偏压荷载，导致曲中墙发生向先行洞一侧偏转，偏转现象在先行洞开挖过渡至后行洞开挖阶段尤为显著。3）曲中墙厚度对其应力分布、偏转效应影响显著，曲中墙厚度的减小降低了结构承载能力；当曲中墙厚度为1.3 m时，曲中墙墙身应力急剧增大，曲中墙可能发生压溃失稳。4）主洞施工步距对曲中墙应力分布影响较大，但不改变曲中墙应力终值；随着主洞施工步距增大，曲中墙偏压弯矩越大，偏转效应持续时间越长。

关键词: 复合式连拱隧道, 曲中墙, 现场监测, 力学特性, 偏压效应, 曲中墙厚度, 施工步距

Abstract: To solve the problem of safety bearing load for the curved middle wall during construction of the doublearch tunnel, the mechanical evolution law and bias mechanism of the curved middle wall during the construction of a composite doublearch tunnel in Zhejiang province, China, are analyzed using numerical calculation and field monitoring methods. Furthermore, the influence laws of the curved middle wall thickness and the main tunnel excavation distance on the stress and bias effect of the curved middle wall are investigated from the design and construction perspectives. The results reveal the following: (1) Excavation of the top heading of the main tunnel has a significant influence on the stress distribution of the curved middle wall. The stress increase accounts for roughly half of the total stress value. The curved middle wall bears the majority of the vertical stress, and the smallest crosssection is the least favorable position. (2) Unsymmetrical excavation of the multiarch tunnel causes the bias load on the curved middle wall, leading to deflection to the side of the first tunnel. The transition from the first tunnel excavation to the later tunnel excavation has a significant deflection effect. (3) Thickness of the curved middle wall has a significant influence on its stress distribution and deflection effect. The reduction in thickness of the middle wall reduces the structure′s bearing capacity. When the thickness is 1.3 m, the stress in the curved middle wall increases dramatically, potentially resulting in collapse instability. (4) The main tunnel excavation distance has a greater influence on the stress distribution of the curved middle wall, but has no effect on the final stress of the curved middle wall. The deflection moment of the curved middle wall increases as the excavation distance of the main tunnel increases, and the deflection effect lasts longer.

Key words: composite doublearch tunnel, curved middle wall, field monitoring, mechanical behavior, bias effect, curved middle wall thickness, excavation distance

徐晴, 张素磊, 刘昌, 张国栋, 陈德刚. 复合式连拱隧道曲中墙施工力学行为时空演化规律[J]. 隧道建设, 2022, 42(6): 1022-1032.

XU Qing, ZHANG Sulei, LIU Chang, ZHANG Guodong, CHEN Degang.

Spatial and Temporal Evolution Characteristics of Mechanical Behavior of Curved Middle Wall of Composite DoubleArch Tunnel [J]. Tunnel Construction, 2022, 42(6): 1022-1032.

[1]	郑波, 吴剑, 袁明, 郑金龙, 郭瑞. 川西高海拔隧道洞内气温特征及抗防冻理念探讨[J]. 隧道建设, 2024, 44(9): 1771-1782.
[2]	潘振华, 包卫星, 卢汉青, 车博文, 尹严. 特高海拔寒区隧道温度场演化规律——以黑恰隧道工程为例 [J]. 隧道建设, 2024, 44(9): 1799-1810.
[3]	包小华, 李浚弘, 陈湘生, 沈俊, 刘自明, 姚义. 水下盾构隧道管片拼装质量控制方法研究现状与展望[J]. 隧道建设, 2024, 44(4): 643-662.
[4]	张春瑜. 高地应力条件下隧道多力学特性锚杆模型及应用研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2024, 44(3): 506-514.
[5]	肖靖, 曾旭涛, 李嘉成, 陈培帅, 李德杰. 沉井侧摩阻力监测装置设计及应用研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2024, 44(3): 535-542.
[6]	孙睿泽, 廖少明, 刘孟波, 朱继文. 软土地层压入式沉井端阻力实测研究——以温州沉井式地下车库工程为例 [J]. 隧道建设, 2023, 43(S2): 310-320.
[7]	蒋雅君, 赵菊梅, 何雨帝, 刘基泰, 裴虎强. 双面黏结型隧道喷膜防水衬砌层间界面力学特性探讨[J]. 隧道建设, 2023, 43(6): 1003-1011.
[8]	陈松林, 王立川, 胡恒千, 王树英, 杨泽斌, 种攀攀, 卢闯, 陈宏伟. 北江引水工程新型敞开式TBM断层破碎带塌方整治技术研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2023, 43(12): 2122-2132.
[9]	林立华. 厦门第二东通道现浇隧道结构托换运营BRT桥桩受力体系转换研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2023, 43(11): 1896-1907.
[10]	韩旭, 张冰利, 洪小星, 朱先发, 王铭杰, 张冬梅. 砂土地层小曲率半径盾构隧道施工引起的地层变形规律——以南通地铁1号线为例 [J]. 隧道建设, 2022, 42(S2): 114-123.
[11]	王超, 石钰锋, 陈昭阳, 朱江伟, 荆永波, 张涛. 富水砂层水平旋喷拱棚力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2022, 42(S2): 242-250.
[12]	杨文涛, 刘夏冰, 贺少辉, 张晓华, 王建军. 浅埋超大跨四线高铁隧道施工方法及开挖响应——以杭台高铁下北山1号隧道为例 [J]. 隧道建设, 2022, 42(S2): 381-388.
[13]	周建军, 蔡光远, 孙飞祥, 彭正勇, 郭瑞, 曾帅, 石荣剑. 钢管冻土组合结构受弯力学特性数值模拟研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2022, 42(S1): 40-47.
[14]	许有俊, 韩志强, 张朝, 孟毅欣, 高胜雷. S型空间曲线圆形顶管管道应力分析——以宁波市电力隧道顶管工程为例 [J]. 隧道建设, 2022, 42(8): 1375-1385.
[15]	吴成刚, 罗杰俊, 林放. 装配式车站出入口环框预制结构沿车站纵向的受力分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2022, 42(3): 414-419.

复合式连拱隧道曲中墙施工力学行为时空演化规律

Spatial and Temporal Evolution Characteristics of Mechanical Behavior of Curved Middle Wall of Composite DoubleArch Tunnel

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价