ISSN 2096-4498
CN 44-1745/U
Tunnel Construction ›› 2014, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 356-361.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.1672-741X.2014.04.011
Previous Articles Next Articles
NIE Zhenyu
Received:
Revised:
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
In this article, the construction cycle time and construction model of Songshanhu tunnel on DongguanHuizhou intercity railway are analyzed, and comparison and contrast is made between national railway tunnels and intercity railway tunnel. It is believed that the requirements specified in Tiejianshe No. [2010]120 are not applicable to the construction of intercity railway tunnels. Proposals made are follows: 1) For intercity railway tunnels in Grade Ⅵ surrounding rock, the distance between the primary support and the working face should be optimized from 35 m to 50 m, and the distance between the secondary lining and the working face should be optimized form 70 m to 85 m; 2) For tunnels in Grade Ⅴ surrounding rock, the distance between the primary support and the working face should be optimized from 35 m to 55 m, and the distance between the secondary lining and the working face should be optimized form 70 m to 90 m; 3) For tunnel in Grade Ⅳ surrounding rock, the distance between the primary support and the working face should be optimized from 35 m to 65 m, and the distance between the secondary lining and the working face should be optimized from 90 m to 120 m.
Key words: intercity underground railway tunnel, grade of surrounding rock, distance between primary support/secondary lining and working face, tunnel crosssection
NIE Zhenyu. Comments on Distance between Primary Support/Secondary Lining and Working Face of Intercity Underground Railway Tunnels[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2014, 34(4): 356-361.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.suidaojs.com/EN/10.3973/j.issn.1672-741X.2014.04.011
http://www.suidaojs.com/EN/Y2014/V34/I4/356