ISSN 2096-4498

   CN 44-1745/U

二维码

Tunnel Construction ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (12): 2007-2017.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2023.12.003

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Rock Strength Prediction Model Based on Drilling Parameters of Rock Drilling Jumbo

ZHANG Shucai1, QIU Wenge2, 3, ZHANG Qifang4, ZHANG Yijiang5, JIANG Shuhua3, LUO Jie2, *   

  1. (1. Anhui-Jiangxi Railway Anhui Co., Ltd., Hefei 230011, Anhui, China; 2. Chengdu Tianyou Tunnel Key Company Ltd., Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering, the Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, China; 4. China Railway Shanghai Design Institute Group Corporation Limited, Shanghai 200070, China; 5. No.3 Construction Company of China Railway No.10 Engineering Group, Hefei 250101, Anhui, China)

  • Online:2023-12-20 Published:2024-01-04

Abstract: To timely, accurately, and comprehensively acquire the uniaxial saturated compressive strength of rocks at the tunnel face and provide an important prerequisite for promoting intelligent tunnel construction and achieving dynamic changes in rock mass classification, a case study is conducted on the Lingshangcun tunnel of the ChizhouHuangshan highspeed railway. Rockdrilling jumbo parameters from 41 sets of tunnel face and surrounding rock strength data from four sets of rocksimilar materials are obtained, respecrtively. After analyzing the rockbreaking process of the rockdrilling jumbo, four indicators, impact pressure, propulsion pressure, rotation pressure, and drilling rate, are selected as input parameters for the prediction model. Strength prediction models are established based on singlefactor regression, multiple nonlinear regression, and the least squares support vector machine (LSSVM) algorithm. The prediction results of the model are as follows: (1) The singlefactor prediction model, using drilling rate as the input parameter, achieves the highest prediction accuracy with a correlation coefficient of 0.945 8 between the predicted and actual values. (2) The multiplefactor prediction model improves the prediction accuracy further, with a correlation coefficient of 0.974 5. (3) The LSSVM algorithm models demonstrates a correlation coefficient of 0.983 8 between the predicted and actual values, with a prediction accuracy close to that of multiple nonlinear regression. This indicates that both models can be used for rock strength prediction in practical applications.

Key words: rock drilling jumbo, uniaxial saturated compressive strength of rock, drilling parameters, regression analysis, machine learning