• 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
  • 中文核心期刊中文科技核心期刊
  • Scopus RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
  • 美国EBSCO数据库 俄罗斯《文摘杂志》
  • 《日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(中国)》
二维码

隧道建设(中英文) ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (10): 1788-1794.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2023.10.015

• 施工机械 • 上一篇    下一篇

卵石地层土压平衡盾构撕裂刀布置模式对比研究

曹伍富1, 邵小康2, 刘哲2, 营升3, 董立朋4, 江玉生2, 杨志勇2, *   

  1. (1. 北京市轨道交通建设管理有限公司, 北京 100068; 2. 中国矿业大学(北京)力学与土木工程学院, 北京 100083; 3. 中铁十八局集团有限公司, 天津 300222; 4. 中铁隧道局集团有限公司, 广东 广州 511458)

  • 出版日期:2023-10-20 发布日期:2023-11-08
  • 作者简介:曹伍富(1972—),男,安徽黟县人,2004年毕业于中国矿业大学(北京),岩土工程专业,博士,教授级高级工程师,主要从事轨道交通建设管理工作。Email: Wfcao2272@163.com。*通信作者: 杨志勇, Email: yangzy1010@126.com。

Comparative Analysis of Arrangement Modes of Tearing Cutters for Earth Pressure Balance Shield Tunneling in Cobble Stratum

CAO Wufu1, SHAO Xiaokang2, LIU Zhe2, YING Sheng3, DONG Lipeng4, JIANG Yusheng2, YANG Zhiyong2, *   

  1. (1. Beijing MTR Construction Administration Corporation, Beijing 100068, China; 2. School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and TechnologyBeijing, Beijing 100083, China; 3. China Railway 18th Bureau Group Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300222, China; 4. China Railway Tunnel Group Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 511458, Guangdong, China)

  • Online:2023-10-20 Published:2023-11-08

摘要: 为研究卵石地层土压平衡盾构撕裂刀布置模式对刀具磨损的影响,结合北京地铁19号线平—积区间、牛—金区间基本相同地层条件下撕裂刀不同布置模式的盾构掘进工程案例,采用数学回归分析方法对比“大高差宽间距”和“小高差窄间距”2种撕裂刀布置模式下的刀具磨损系数。研究结果表明: 1)在地质情况、掘进参数、渣土改良等条件基本一致的情况下,[JP2]采取“小高差窄间距”撕裂刀布置模式的刀盘上刀具磨损量更大,其高撕裂刀、低撕裂刀、刮刀的磨损系数分别为“大高差宽间距”模式的1.53.22倍; 2)“大高差宽间距”撕裂刀布置模式下,高、低撕裂刀起到了良好的分层犁松作用,有效降低了撕裂刀的磨损; 3)“大高差”撕裂刀布置模式比“小高差”布置模式下的刮刀磨损系数减小了42.7%,“宽间距”布置模式比“窄间距”布置模式下的刮刀磨损系数减小了36.1%

关键词: 地铁, 卵石地层, 土压平衡盾构, 撕裂刀, 刀高差, 刀间距, 磨损系数

Abstract:  To investigate the influence of tearing cutter arrangement modes on the wear of tearing cutters during earth pressure balance shield tunneling in cobble strata, a case study is conducted on shield tunneling projects of the Ping′anliJishuitan and NiujieJinrongjie sections of Beijing metro line 19.  Using mathematical regression analysis, the wear coefficients of tearing cutters under two arrangement modes: large height difference and distance and small height difference and distance, are investigated and compared. The findings are as follows. (1) Under identical geological conditions, excavation parameters, and soil improvement techniques, the wear is significantly higher with the small height difference and spacing arrangement mode compared to the large height difference and spacing arrangement mode. Furthermore, the wear coefficients for high tearing cutters, low tearing cutters, and scrape cutters are 1.5, 3.2, and 2 times greater, respectively, under the small height difference and spacing arrangement mode. (2) The high and low tearing cutters, when placed with a large height difference and spacing, effectively contribute to layering and loosening, thus reducing tearing cutter wear. (3) Scrape wear coefficients under the large height difference and spacing arrangement modes are 42.7% and 36.1% lower compared to the small height difference and spacing arrangement modes, respectively.

Key words: metro, cobble stratum, earth pressure balance shield, tearing cutter, cutter height difference, cutter spacing, wear coefficient