• 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
  • 中文核心期刊中文科技核心期刊
  • Scopus RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
  • 美国EBSCO数据库 俄罗斯《文摘杂志》
  • 《日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(中国)》
二维码

隧道建设(中英文) ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1): 163-171.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2024.01.015

• 施工技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

悬臂掘进机法在挤压性围岩隧道中的适应性研究——以木寨岭公路隧道为例

唐绍武1, 郭新新2, *, 于家武3, 龙文华3   

  1. (1. 中铁隧道局集团有限公司, 广东 广州 511458 2. 成都理工大学环境与土木工程学院, 四川 成都 610059 3. 中铁隧道集团二处有限公司, 河北 三河 065201)
  • 出版日期:2024-01-20 发布日期:2024-02-04
  • 作者简介:唐绍武(1976—),男,江西宜黄人,1999年毕业于华东交通大学,铁道工程专业,本科,高级工程师,主要从事隧道高地应力软岩施工方面工作。Email: 314589225@qq.com。*通信作者: 郭新新, Email: zj_gxinxin@163.com。

Adaptability of Cantilever Roadheader Construction Method in Squeezing Rock Tunnels: A Case Study of Muzhailing Highway Tunnel

TANG Shaowu1, GUO Xinxin2, *, YU Jiawu3, LONG Wenhua3   

  1. (1. China Railway Tunnel Group Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 511458, Guangdong, China; 2. College of Environment and Civil Engineering, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, Sichuan, China; 3. The 2nd Engineering Co., Ltd. of China Railway Tunnel Group, Sanhe 065201, Hebei, China)
  • Online:2024-01-20 Published:2024-02-04

摘要:

为探明悬臂掘进机法应用于挤压性围岩隧道的可行性与具体效果,以木寨岭公路隧道为依托,首先开展基于工程地质条件的悬臂掘进机法适用性分析;其次,结合工程实施条件,对悬臂掘进机进行选型,并设计2台阶悬臂掘进开挖方案;最后,依托工程试验段,重点从施工效能和实施效果2方面,开展2台阶悬臂掘进机法和3台阶钻爆法开挖的对比研究。研究结论如下: 1)综合对岩石强度、开挖断面和工效3个因素进行分析,悬臂掘进机选型应重点考虑切割面积和切割功率。2)木寨岭公路隧道围岩按能否较好适应于悬臂掘进机法开挖,可划分为26种。3)对比3台阶钻爆法开挖的施工效能,2台阶悬臂掘进机法的施工进度提高20%,平均超挖减少150 mm,用工量减少5~10人,喷混凝土超耗量减少57%4)对比3台阶钻爆法开挖的围岩位移、压力、拱架应力和锚索轴力,2台阶悬臂掘进机法中围岩压力减小0.010.11 MPa;围岩位移和拱架应力最终量值无明显变化,但分布更均匀、更快趋于恒值;锚索平均轴力增大39 kN。

关键词: 挤压性围岩隧道, 悬臂掘进机法, 钻爆法, 现场试验

Abstract: In this study, a case study is conducted on the Muzhailing highway tunnel to explore the feasibility and applicable effects of the cantilever roadheader construction method in squeezing rock tunnels based on engineering geological conditions. The types of cantilever roadheader are selected according to the project implementation conditions, and a twobench excavation scheme for the cantilever roadheader is designed and developed. Furthermore, a comparative analysis is conducted on twobench excavation by a cantilever roadheader and threebench excavation for drilling and blasting in a test section in terms of construction efficiency and effect. The main findings are summarized as follows: (1) The selection of the cantilever roadheader should focus on the cutting area and power according to rock strength, excavation crosssection, and work efficiency; (2) The surrounding rocks of the Muzhailing highway tunnel can be divided into two categories and six types based on the applicability of cantilever roadheader; (3) Compared with the construction efficiency of the threebench drilling and blasting method, the twobench cantilever roadheader construction method can increase construction advance by 20% and reduce average overexcavation, labor consumption, and shotcrete overconsumption by 150 mm, 510 persons, and 57%, respectively; (4) Compared with the threebench drilling and blasting method, the surrounding rock pressure is reduced by 0.010.11 MPa using the twobench cantilever roadheader construction method with a stable and evenlydistributed final surrounding rock displacement and arch frame stress. Moreover, the average stress of the anchor cable is increased by 39 kN.

Key words: squeezing rock tunnel, cantilever roadheader construction, drilling and blasting excavation, field test